(5)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3)
CarbonFiber is V/LA until the 9th. hp [leaves] is V/LA until the 11th. Nibelung is V/LA until the 12th.
Remilia has spent way too much time being concerned with things like nachomamma's point system, how to look at hydra's, etc. They've also spent a fuckton of time asking questions, and they have an artificial feel to them. Also the "I don't really like this," "I don't know about this," "I liked this for the most part except for this," etc. sticks out to me. They are not giving any solid opinions. They are making statements without the confidence to back them. Like playing a neutral party because they don't actually have any reads.In post 540, Syryana wrote:I like how he called you out on the blatant WIFOM in his #99. He also gives good reasons as to why you're a scumread in #363. His interactions with you also give me town vibes.In post 537, ² wrote:syryana, I find your having toastytoast in your town pile to be the oddest part of your sort there. based on his play so far, I am not seeing that at all. why do you think he's town?
Why do you think he's scum? Not including the WIFOM thing. Since that's pretty much been beaten into the ground at this point.
After going and reading his ISO though I am curious as to why he finds Remilia scummy.
@ToastyToast, why is Remilia scummy?
I so want to vote thisIn post 551, Remembrance wrote:I have not slept in 32 hours.
Finals.
I asked you that question because there were too many assumptions to make, to make conclusions. In particular, I thought it was scummy, but then the accusation as to why it was scummy to say what you said, involves too many assumptions, such as familiarity with the story enough to know that no town themed character would have that posting restriction. To me, role-fishing has a negative connotation attached, but I thought about the ambiguity in the circumstance and thought it best to ask you before, just throwing accusations with a load of inductive leaps thrown in.
I can't even write this post well. Too many commas.
About those players I don't have the time or the right frame of mind to write that particular wall. Which would inevitably follow from the questions I would ask of each of them.
If I were in my right mind right now I would:
Vote Gamma
Throw an accusation at Syrana (but for entirely different reasons)
And I wouldn't ask that ^2 question. Because...
Your ^2 read, I think I know what you think. But I don't share your level of confidence in that read. So I'm not going hyper defensive on it like you are. That said, it's awesome that you're defending what you see as obvious town picking on those that are on it for scum motivations. Or maybe I'm misinterpreting it. I don't know.
Revvin' up that spin cycle thereToastguywhatever wrote:Remilia has spent way too much time being concerned with things like nachomamma's point system, how to look at hydra's, etc. They've also spent a fuckton of time asking questions, and they have an artificial feel to them. Also the "I don't really like this," "I don't know about this," "I liked this for the most part except for this," etc. sticks out to me. They are not giving any solid opinions. They are making statements without the confidence to back them. Like playing a neutral party because they don't actually have any reads.
In post 558, borkjerfkin wrote:I don't understand what you're asking -- and you certainly weren't directing the question at me at the time. Although I don't know why you would possibly think it's unreasonable for one head to play differently than another.
Why should he?In post 556, Remilia Scarlet wrote: Why aren't you getting on the people who started that dumb as shit "scum mason" conversation that led from the hydra thing? Because that was bad; what I said was not.
Didn't you just say you didn't find any of the stuff he brought up in #552 compelling? How does meta on me make it more or less compelling? Wouldn't my alignment in those games matter? I feel like we're talking in circles.tne wrote:If I should change my read on you based on what toasty was pointing out.