(5)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(8)
Nibelung has requested replacement. Searching...
hp [leaves] wrote:A weak meta case based on you not being able to read MattP (who hasn't posted much at all) as town. What do you think about Sajin now? Why is AM prioritized over Sajin today? And "because 6" is an answer I won't accept.
In post 997, Remilia Scarlet wrote:@Magua: Is there any other reason why you think Angsty is scum except for that lol-matt-is-not-posting?
4nxi3ty's posting just leaves me feeling empty. It's like pushes and prods, but no filler. I can't say 4nxi3ty's not taking stances, because he is, they just feel flat, like the most basic, easiest stances around.Nachomamma wrote:Disinterested, but not a non-presence. That scum MattP was in thread posting shit plenty, whereas this MattP is completely leaving his partner out to dry with posting as scum. I also don't seem to recall him making promises that he'd get into the game constantly; that read more to me like he was trying to kick himself into gear and just not making it whereas he was consistently underwhelming in Gay Mafia II but really didn't talk about it at all. I've also been a pretty big fan on 4nxi3ty's posting lately. Have you found issue with it?
alright I'll play a bit more openIn post 984, Nachomamma8 wrote:Don't care if they're nulls, they should lean one way or the other. Give me some reads.
of course not, matt wasn't posting much in the QT at the time.Magua wrote:but there's no "Matt said he thinks this in the QT" from 4nxi3ty
^2, Rememberance, Gamma, Saijin, Toasty are all players i defended when momentum was already on them or shifting towards them.I can't say 4nxi3ty's not taking stances, because he is, they just feel flat, like the most basic, easiest stances around.
Saijin wrote:@AM- Where did Toasty wonder if he was wrong? Are you just refering this quote or was there something else?
In post 686, ToastyToast wrote: As much as I dislike ^2's game right now, I think I'm somewhat blinded by the fact that we have very different styles/views on mafia. i still think ^2 is scum, but there are better things to push.
Job issues.In post 1002, Magua wrote:Reallyinterested why Nibelung went from taking the time to reread Gamma's posts, taking time Sunday to reread the topic (as per 886), to replacing out.
so, what is the hypothetical scum motivation for Nibelung?magua wrote:Really interested why Nibelung went from taking the time to reread Gamma's posts, taking time Sunday to reread the topic (as per 886), to replacing out.
No vote from any of you 2?In post 960, Remilia Scarlet wrote:Just a note to myself about where I stand right now.
Town: Rem, MS, Nacho, Nielburg, Vi
L.Town: Sajin, implosion
Null: Syr, CF Riot
L.Scum: TNE, Toasty
Most of them I'm sheeping bork
-G
Hypothetical scum motivation would be losing D1 lynch followed up with not being able to secure a D2 mislynch.In post 1007, Maxous wrote:so, what is the hypothetical scum motivation for Nibelung?
It never did. Why are you assuming it did? Why are youIn post 995, ToastyToast wrote: So I don't think the Gamma scum flip in any way clears Metal Sonic.
Yes. The multiple confirmations that Gamma was not new was enough to confirm that Gamma was to be lynched.In post 995, ToastyToast wrote: @Metal: Were you aware that Gamma was at L-1 when you voted him?
Assume I'm town for a moment. It sounds perfectly plausible as town as is scum. Why are you prejudiced?In post 995, ToastyToast wrote:MetalSonic wrote:Don't judge till you see the flip !
yes that was a scummy post, but flips are always very fun and exciting, and I hope you agreeMetalSonic wrote:All I did was to lynch scum using my scumhunting methods. Is that wrong?The more he says things like this, the more convinced I am that he's scum. He keeps shoving it into our faces. "look at me! I got a scum right so I can't be scum!!!! You can't be mad at me for quick-lynching because I was right!!" And some of these were said BEFORE Gamma had even flipped.MetalSonic wrote:If it is not wrong to lynch scum, and if it is the right thing to do, then why in tarnation are you voting me???
If your evidence for why a person is scum only works if you assume the person is scum, the only person in a fallacy here is you.In post 995, ToastyToast wrote:
That makes me think he actually knew what the flip was going to be, and decided to distance himself from Gamma. Scum teams often use a teammate who is in trouble as a sacrifice to clear doubt from the other team members. And that is what I think is happening here.
This is horrible and I could pretty much lynch you happily based on this post alone.In post 1011, Magua wrote:Hypothetical scum motivation would be losing D1 lynch followed up with not being able to secure a D2 mislynch.In post 1007, Maxous wrote:so, what is the hypothetical scum motivation for Nibelung?
He defended the fuck out of Gamma in a way that was far scummier than AM's blatant, genuine defense.In post 1001, Amethyst Kitty wrote:Nacho can you explain the CF scum read please?
He notices me sheeping and adding pressure for my own reasons, never asks me my reasons but continues to resist the wagon.In post 281, CF Riot wrote:Vi gave his reason and I assume Nacho is sheeping or adding pressure for his own reasons. I didn't read your wall so I missed what you said about gamma but having read it now it's hella weak.
Vote: Sajin
@PMatt I think Chrome can translate most of those pages.
Attacking Sajin for a weak vote on Gamma is nothing more than a shitty chainsaw defense.In post 446, CF Riot wrote:For me it's this. This is Sajin's support for his vote on Gamma. I don't find this to be a particularly strong reason to think someone is scum, and Sajin's vote was placed shortly after 2 other votes on Gamma while Sajin had 2 votes himself, which makes the timing look opportunistic.
Agreeing with the Gamma counterwagon coming up, soft-defending Gamma but not being aggressive in making people to provide reasons, the "not liking a post by Kalimar in the last 5 pages" shit which just sucks.In post 799, CF Riot wrote:I agree with the TNE scumreads. I think Sonic is kind of suspect but not top of my list. I don't feel like Gamma's play should have gathered as many votes as it has. I still suspect Sajin. I feel like Vi sort of deflected my conversation with him about Sajin and I will be watching him closely. I think I remember not liking a post by Kalimar somewhere in the last 5ish pages but I'll look that up again. Still comfortable with my vote on Sajin.
This post is scummy as fuck considering Gamma was quickhammered and one of his "kind of suspects" was the culprit.In post 846, CF Riot wrote:lol, really Nacho? -1 for a prod dodge?
And yet you're not voting me, so.In post 1014, Nachomamma8 wrote:This is horrible and I could pretty much lynch you happily based on this post alone.
Actually, no. I'm rereading Sajin a bit, and I think that he's a false positive. I like my Magua and CF Riot and ToastyToast reads a whollle lot more.In post 1019, Kalimar wrote:@Nachomamma: on Sajin: Do you think ISO #8 and 9's Sajin commentary from Gamma was a bluff, then? It seems quite self-defeating to try and deflect attention onto another scum member like that at that early point of the game. It'd be early enough in the game to try something like that and distance from it - but it seems quite unambitious. In the Mafia in La La Land game his initial scumbuddy vote at the start was given a flimsy reason, was hopped off fairly fast and wasn't pushed anywhere near as much as the Sajin one was.
Or you were pushing for me to measure your town cred earned from yesterday. Or you put too much faith in a poor point system. I still have outgoing questions to you from my last post. Need me to relist them?In post 1020, Nachomamma8 wrote:Actually, no. I'm rereading Sajin a bit, and I think that he's a false positive. I like my Magua and CF Riot and ToastyToast reads a whollle lot more.In post 1019, Kalimar wrote:@Nachomamma: on Sajin: Do you think ISO #8 and 9's Sajin commentary from Gamma was a bluff, then? It seems quite self-defeating to try and deflect attention onto another scum member like that at that early point of the game. It'd be early enough in the game to try something like that and distance from it - but it seems quite unambitious. In the Mafia in La La Land game his initial scumbuddy vote at the start was given a flimsy reason, was hopped off fairly fast and wasn't pushed anywhere near as much as the Sajin one was.
fair enough. Thanks. Now I just want to wait for Matt and CF to become alive again.In post 1022, Nachomamma8 wrote:Metal Sonic bussing was a hypothetical and doesn't reflect my actual thoughts at all. Your other two questions were answered. One of them was answered in the post you quoted.
^2 accepted this proposal, so unless Nacho couldn't convince them to do otherwise and/or he is pure evil and would break a negotiation, he is town. Of course the initial thought for me is a lot like every other person that does such a, for a lack of a better word, "gambit." But, I probably buy it.In post 44, Nachomamma8 wrote: Buldey, can we make a truce until day 3? Best friends: neither of us suspects the other until day 3, we don't kill each other until day 3 if scum (or at least fight hard for an alternate kill if they really want to kill our slots that badly), we don't play dirty with power roles until day 3. I think it will be most to our benefit if we are both town, but if one of us is scum, I think it will work to the townie's benefit. Do you agree?