Mini 1454 - GAME OVER

notscience · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:34 pm

You also said "were" which implies it is out of date. So, you're voting me thanks to your out of date abilities to read newbies, which may or may not be true. Good to know.

What's passive? How I want answers before a vote? You keep saying things, yet not backing them up.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:38 pm

Erm I never meant it to be out-of-date?
I blame my English for that.

Anyway you want proof?

What you just did is one of the proof.

You had no objection me voting you until amrun questioned my vote on you.

notscience · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:40 pm

In post 805, notscience wrote:Shocker, GIF is voting for me again.

GIF, care to vote any actual scum? Or are you just going to sit there on me this whole game without pursuing other people

Nice Misrep.

Rob14 · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:42 pm

Vote Count #3.1:

kthxbye:

Amrun, bubbajack8 (2)

bubbajack8:

kthxbye (1)

notscience:

GuyInFreezer (1)

Not Voting:

JuanJuan, marcmann2, notscience, Nobody Special, jon_h61

With 9 alive, it takes 5 players to reach a lynch.

V/LA:

None

Deadline:

(expired on 2013-06-25 21:00:00)

In post 814, Amrun wrote:The standard notation on this site is that kill flavors -- like actual announcements about who is dead and who is not -- are official, ie different factions sometimes but not always have different "flavors" (ie exploded, killed). This being a normal game, I assumed it was standard notation. Are you saying that the kill flavors don't indicate which party killed whom?

I'm saying that all flavor should be treated as entirely insignificant to the game. It's there for enjoyment purposes only. It is meant to give nothing in the way of hints or knowledge to anyone.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:43 pm

You never questioned my vote. All you did was "hey vote other ppl."

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:45 pm

So my point: you're not objecting. You're just passing it off.

notscience · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:49 pm

So, calling you out on your voteparking=passive. Good to know. If the calling out isn't objection, then I obviously need to be more clear.

Amrun · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:49 pm

In post 818, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 812, Amrun wrote:
In post 809, GuyInFreezer wrote:His terrible d1 play and he hasn't done any better.

I have an another suspect and now that my Internet is stable I wanna have a little chat with him.
Why does "terrible play" indicate scum?
Because of the tone. I use that a lot when I read newbs.

And you haven't re-evaluated at all? Which things indicated a tone you find scummy?

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:51 pm

What do you mean by "re-evaluate?"

notscience · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:51 pm

Amrun, he already said he "can't explain it"

AKA, I'm not going to explain it so I can park my vote here and look like I have a reason!

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:01 pm

I explained your "misrep" accusation so you explain mine now.
All I said was that I couldn't explain the tone. I don't remember saying that I can't explain my scumread on you.

Amrun · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:30 pm

I asked you to explain the scumread, and this is all you gave me.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:34 pm

In post 832, Amrun wrote:
In post 818, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 812, Amrun wrote:
In post 809, GuyInFreezer wrote:His terrible d1 play and he hasn't done any better.

I have an another suspect and now that my Internet is stable I wanna have a little chat with him.
Why does "terrible play" indicate scum?
Because of the tone. I use that a lot when I read newbs.
And you haven't re-evaluated at all? Which things indicated a tone you find scummy?

In post 833, GuyInFreezer wrote:What do you mean by "re-evaluate?"

Amrun · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:36 pm

Like, you're just totally happy to vote park for a completely insubstantial reason, without commenting on jack all else or incorporating later actions and flips into your read?

Your read on notscience hasn't evolved at all, and it troubles me.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:37 pm

ugh you're asking for a case on him, aren't you?

Amrun · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:46 pm

Not really. I was asking for an off-the-cuff answer that would indicate to me whether or not you were scum vote parking or town with a conviction.

Guess which prize you won?

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:53 pm

Candy!

Anyway case tomorrow.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:00 pm

Also you can't expect me to "evolve" my read on notscience when he's doing the same thing over and over.

bubbajack8 · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:11 pm

In post 801, Amrun wrote:
You're joking, right?

Scum DID kill. We had a doctor protect night 1, which was obviously successful. Scum kill flavor is obviously "exploded," which leaves the "kill" flavor for the Serial Killer (AJ).

Are we really taking these flavors to heart? Why didn't fuzzy save the SK kill, and maf killed Hoopla. You seem REALLY close-minded on this one.

In post 802, Kthxbye wrote:Bubba, why is your amrun read out the window exactly?

I thought it was fuzzy and Amrun, although it could be Amrun and you, or Amrun and notscience.

But I still think you are scum. And hell my 100% can't be that bad..

In post 803, GuyInFreezer wrote: Pushing kthx for "quick hammer" is terrible cos its clearly an accidental hammer.

>accidental when there are pre edits.

In post 806, Amrun wrote: And my vote for ktb has nothing to do with his hammer, btw. When it happened, I thought it might be faked, BUT -- it's unlikely as either alignment. It was most likely genuine. Accidents happen; doesn't mean he's not scum.

My vote isn't just BECAUSE of the hammer, I'm carrying it over.

In post 813, Rob14 wrote:
I believe I did not adequately make this clear. All flavor in the game is just that - flavor. It contains no hints, whatsoever. It just amuses me to write it (and hopefully amuses you to read it).

I thought that was a given.

Kthxbye · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:28 pm

In post 843, bubbajack8 wrote:I thought it was fuzzy and Amrun, although it could be Amrun and you, or Amrun and notscience.

But I still think you are scum. And hell my 100% can't be that bad..

And THIS is why I'm voting bubba....

We lynched a SK... That means scum were totally fine with killing him as they didn't know he wasn't town. That means bubba's reverse in his read of Amrun is completely out of left field

Kthxbye · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:30 pm

In post 796, Amrun wrote:KTB, please quote where you thought bubba alluded to being the doc.

Because of his p52 "lol. Lynching doc is a pretty terribad move (;"

Kthxbye · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:32 pm

In post 800, notscience wrote:However, why the sudden taking your vote off of NS, when you said you'd be on him until he was lynched?

NS isn't off the table. The fact that a wagon on him would have been easy for scum to jump on yet nobody really did jump on it makes him look more scum than town. That said, bubba reversing his top scum read from the lynch of an SK is much more scummy.

Amrun · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:35 pm

In post 845, Kthxbye wrote:
In post 796, Amrun wrote:KTB, please quote where you thought bubba alluded to being the doc.
Because of his p52 "lol. Lynching doc is a pretty terribad move (;"

page what?

Amrun · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:37 pm

Oh.

Hmm....

HMMMMMMMM

That's valid.

Bubba, why did you say that about lynching doc?

Kthxbye · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 8:03 pm

In post 821, Nobody Special wrote:Almost only counts in horseshoes and handgrenades.

^yet another reason NS is most certainly not off my scum list

on the flip side, if I was ever doubtful about Amrun, I'm not any longer.