Beacuse some of what she said was true. I'm sorry, by your logic, should town always rant and rave when under attack?In post 467, Broken Aquarium wrote:moz - why didn't you get your back up?
I did not say he used it in past. I said it was used here. In fact a skim over his posts shows no other obsessive use of the word.In post 442, JKLM wrote:No wait peace bringer has a point, if at one point that used to be a tell early on it still could be a more subtle tell today.
That's actually a good point and based on his join date he's been around enough to prob know what he's talking about there
What exactly is unhelpful about providing a name when asked for a nameclaim?In post 471, mozamis wrote:UNVOTE
Claim is ok, I guess. Jester is really reaching with his legalistic arguments. Guy was asked to claim, and he did. If he had just said "Rumblebiffin" it would not have been at all helpful. So to lynch the guy for actually being helpful seems wrong headed.
Ironically players still had to check Google because they had no fucking clue who Rumblebuffin was. Because, "I'm a Rumblebuffin giant!" isn't as helpful as you'd like to think it is. Maybe,In post 479, mozamis wrote:If he had just said "Rumblebiifin", I for one -and almost certainly everyone else - would have said "Right, who the hell is that then?"
For the record I think you are town, but I just think you're over analyising and reaching here.
To those quibbling with the wording choice, note that MD states not knowing who 'he' is, implying that his character is a specific individual. I don't like that he had to have his claim pulled out over more than one post, but the confusing wording looks more like a town mistake than a scum slip to me.In post 446, mnemonicdevice wrote:This game is getting interesting... I don't understand the whole reason why I was supposed to name claim initially but:
Alright, I am a Rumblebuffin giant.
Not sure who he is, haven't seen Narnia in quite a while.
Also, I like to say interesting. If you knew me in real life, I would say interesting a lot.
S
Mafia is all about looking at actions and analyzing the varying motivations that might lead to them. As it stands, I can't fathom any town motivation for including information that would not naturally accompany a nameclaim.In post 481, mozamis wrote:I'm simply saying that he he wasked for a nameclaim and he gave it. The fact that he gave a bit more information seems a nonsense reason for lynching him.
No.In post 485, mnemonicdevice wrote:Ugh.... I misread my pm. I haven't seen narnia in a while, so I thought that there was a group of people called "rumblebuffin giants" and that I was one of them. I am a vanilla townie though.
That is pretty bad.In post 485, mnemonicdevice wrote:Ugh.... I misread my pm. I haven't seen narnia in a while, so I thought that there was a group of people called "rumblebuffin giants" and that I was one of them. I am a vanilla townie though.
Yeah, I buy that. Guess that's fair. What do you make of the wagin on him in general?In post 489, RachMarie wrote:I am not saying anything about other reasons peeps are voting for him I am just saying based on the claim I dont buy into KJs adamant avowal that it is clearly a scum fake claim because see how he messed it up. My esperience has been scum are less likely to fumble than town. As in the example I posted.
Sorry, just noticed this again (I was in a rush when I first saw it and didn't have time to post, and then forgot). So, he had some bad logic involving my use of the word honestly even though he later claimed that him saying interesting wasn't a scumtell when there was no difference, and that is pretty hypocritical and scummy. He refused and continues to refuse to explain his BA read and how he originally came to the conclusion that BA was the Ice Queen. His read on me changed without explanation, or he forgot about it, even though I was busy with life and just not posting, which shouldn't make him any less suspicious of me if it was genuine suspicion. And then he had that whole Named Townie claim, which came out poorly, so yes. That is why I'm voting for him still.In post 476, mozamis wrote:Skelda, give me YOUR case on MD.
Sure, there is a chance he is not scum and as claimed. Here is the deal, he claimed town. However his behavior is sketchy and only way anyone knows for sure is to get the flip. Oh, and as to who fumbles what, that is all WIFOM. Fumbling can be faked, or even a genuine misunderstanding of something twisted for the circumstance. Not going to know until the flip.In post 489, RachMarie wrote:I am not saying anything about other reasons peeps are voting for him I am just saying based on the claim I dont buy into KJs adamant avowal that it is clearly a scum fake claim because see how he messed it up. My esperience has been scum are less likely to fumble than town. As in the example I posted.
are you sure about that?In post 432, JKLM wrote:Nah he just says intersting all the time, it's his thing
when he says it without really meaning anything... it's weird.In post 441, Skelda wrote:How on earth is saying interesting a scumtell? I agree, I want MD to nameclaim and he deserves votes until he does, but is saying interesting really a great case against him? Does that seem like something scum would be more likely to say?
i remember linking to one game i played with him (he was town) and didn't use it.In post 444, Garmr wrote:Has anyone looked at MD past scum games to see if he actually used Interesting in them ............ guess that's going to fall on me
lol. now you are mocking, mneumonicIn post 446, mnemonicdevice wrote:This game is getting.. I don't understand the whole reason why I was supposed to name claim initially but:interesting.
Alright, I am a Rumblebuffin giant.
Not sure who he is, haven't seen Narnia in quite a while.
Also, I like to say interesting. If you knew me in real life, I would say interesting a lot.
S
ya but there's other stuff to 'convict' himIn post 460, JKLM wrote:Idk if it's big enough to convict him but he could have just picked one off he most obscure characters in the book to fakeclaim
don't be silly. it's not that i think you have to rant or rave.In post 475, mozamis wrote:Beacuse some of what she said was true. I'm sorry, by your logic, should town always rant and rave when under attack?In post 467, Broken Aquarium wrote:moz - why didn't you get your back up?
It's called trying to have a rational debate with someone.