Vote Count 0.4 |
---|
Grimgroove (1) : Scarlet YoshiXScorpion (3) : pieceofpecanpie, Taylor, GrimGrooveTaylor (3) : Paschendale, willwang123, XScorpionpieceofpecanpie (3) : phokdapolees, shos, BlueberryPaschendale (1) : ObscurityShos (1) : Helium-3Not Voting (1) : T S O |
With 13 alive it's 7 to lynch. | Deadline is in (expired on 2013-11-27 17:18:00) |
Willwang V/LA until 11/17 |
Open 536: Faith Plus One Game Over! Mafia Win!
-
-
bubbajack8 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: April 3, 2013
Arguing goes back and forth, but little changes, and the torches need to be re-lit.
Last edited by bubbajack8 on Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.ShowCome bet on the Copa del Rey!
MY GTKAS
Modded Games:
Open 558: Hope Plus One In Confirmation!
Crack the Code!
Open 536: Scum win.-
-
Obscurity Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 109
- Joined: December 3, 2011
Susan (may I call you Susan?), I think you're overreacting. Stahp.In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@everyoneI don't really see good things coming out of a hydra slot that doesn't want to reveal themselves (re: Taylor). No way of reading the players or taking their town/scum games into consideration. Best to just lynch early imo.
How doIn post 73, XScorpion wrote:Oh god can you imagine if the scumteam is all 3 hydras?youknow how many scum there are?
unvote: Paschendalebased on post 94. Thanks for joining us.
By the bottom of page 7 I'm ready to kill both XScorp and Taylor. KNOCK IT OFFGlory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.~~ Napoleon Bonaparte-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Exactly what I was thinking.In post 76, pieceofpecanpie wrote:You put your vote down after my first post/vote, post 51, so you must be referring to my"Well this Day just got easy"line as being sucky reasoning... Is that even worthy of being called "reasoning"?
Did you just use a stock term to justify your vote?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Agreed.In post 94, Paschendale wrote:XScorpion has gone kind of bananas over this wagon, though. There's some suspicion from Taylor's actions, but not this much. XScorpion is unfocused. That could be scum trying to find a weakness to exploit, or town poking people for reactions. The speed with which XS hops off of a new wagon, and tends to hyperfocus on whoever they're voting for. It doesn't seem to be gathering too much information, just trying to push the ball rolling however they can. Plus the vote on Pecan is dumb. Pecan's vote wasn't particularly suspect, especially for a first post in what could still be the RVS phase.
But why then, do you think Taylor's vote on Xscorpion is bad?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Exactly what I was thinking.In post 99, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
You're kidding right?In post 98, shos wrote:read the game [...] can anyone explain to me if there's anything against Xscorp or are we just having fun?
Liking this pie dude!"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I see what you're doing here.In post 101, XScorpion wrote:Shos, you're learning. I'm so proud of you. GG should be ashamed.
Do not like."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I don't agree with this argument and I found the pecan-wagon more opportunistic looking than any other. Everyone on it is getting FOS'd.In post 102, Blueberry wrote:
The way I get it is that they decided not to disclose their identities before the game which, while could be useful if they were scum, is really not indicative of their alignment because they did not know their role at the time of making that decision. The fact that you suggest a quicklynch because them not disclosing their identities and preventing other players from metaing them is obviously scummy seems opportunistic and scummy to me.In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@everyoneI don't really see good things coming out of a hydra slot that doesn't want to reveal themselves (re: Taylor). No way of reading the players or taking their town/scum games into consideration. Best to just lynch early imo.
Vote: Pecanpie"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
The setup is perfectly clear. This is an open game. What the hell is there to discuss?In post 110, XScorpion wrote:
I considered but decided that discussion of the setup is not helpful at this stage of the game and it is more productive to use this time scum hunting and not speculating.In post 106, shos wrote:eh, anyone has anything to say about the setup maybe?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Yup!In post 111, Paschendale wrote:
This looks awfully full of obvious misrep to me. Pecan is not calling for a quicklynch. He's calling for what might be a policy lynch, but "early" pretty obviously means early in the game, as in days, as in don't wait for day 4, rather than a quicklynch without much discussion. And Pecan is right, lack of meta information does make it more difficult to get a read on them and thus denies town information. I don't think it's a lot of information that we're missing, but the charge of opportunism comes completely out of left field. There's no convenient or low risk vote at this point. We're on page 5, and it was page 3 at the time. The fourth vote on a wagon that is currently under discussion is hardly opportunism.In post 102, Blueberry wrote:
The way I get it is that they decided not to disclose their identities before the game which, while could be useful if they were scum, is really not indicative of their alignment because they did not know their role at the time of making that decision. The fact that you suggest a quicklynch because them not disclosing their identities and preventing other players from metaing them is obviously scummy seems opportunistic and scummy to me.In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@everyoneI don't really see good things coming out of a hydra slot that doesn't want to reveal themselves (re: Taylor). No way of reading the players or taking their town/scum games into consideration. Best to just lynch early imo.
Never heard of traditional reading where you analyze a player's post/ask questions etc?In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote: No way of reading the players
Lastly, the "no way of reading" bit is clearly taken way out of context. Pecan is saying that there's no way to know who they are. Not unless someone is very familiar with various players' posting styles and can pick out who is who just from that. It would certainly be more difficult than with a hydra that signs each half's posts.
None of this should be construed as defense of Pecan (though votes on him are really bad at the moment), but I have to ask what's with all the misreps and bad assumptions? Why not make a case based on what Pecan actually said rather than obvious misreps? What do you have to hide?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
You cans ee how this is hilarious right?In post 117, Taylor wrote:I think you're missing the point.
I was correcting pasch, who seems to believe people find pecan scummy because he suggested that we be lynched quickly, and assumes that everyone voting pecan had the same misunderstanding - that "quickly" implied "quicklynch".
I don't believe that's the case at all, considering that no one said "quicklynch" or even insinuated it. For someone who accused others of "misreps", I find it hypocritical that he did the same thing.
Taylor is town though."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Whoops, no, maybe not. Back to null with Taylor.
In post 93, Taylor wrote:Apologies, but we will not, not at this time. We're town and if you're town also (I think you are), we'll be working well together. That's about all there is to say.
These things between brackets.In post 124, Taylor wrote:
We are town, Dale. Continuing to push us is about the worst possible thing you can do if you're also town. (Which we think you are.)In post 94, Paschendale wrote:I could see Taylor as scum based on the reaction. It's way overblown. Same problems voting Pecan. Taylor's posts just look empty and fluffy to me. Not the thoughts of someone who is trying to figure out what's going on. Vote on Taylor stays and is now serious. Looks like I poked the hornet's nest with my sharp stick.
PEedit: Yeah... Taylor voting for XS looks even worse. Pretty sold that one of them is scum. I think it's Taylor more than XS.
(buddying)
Myes."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Your insitance on this hydra-business is a nuisance and has got nothing to do with this game. I had to sift through several pages of this bullshit. Hydra's not disclosing their heads is very common, not alignment indicative and has no influence on the game on how you read people.In post 125, XScorpion wrote:
Can you at least sign your messages as Head A or Head B or something? Because I swear if this is just the beginning of more nonsense then I'll eat my own words and actually policy lynch you just for being a nuisance.In post 124, Taylor wrote:You are correct that the reaction of my partner was overblown.
That argument about hydra-dissonance is also inflated. The fact you use it before it occurred does sit well with me though. I think scum would wait until the inevitable occurs (hydra dissonance is close to inevitable) and only use it as an argument then.
Could you point me to a game where you used meta in your scumhunt? You're making a big deal out of something I suspect you don't even employ in your towngames."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
VOTE: BlueBerry
End of page 6 XScorpion is reading very town to me. His frustrations, though unwarranted, feel genuine.
XScorpion, clarify this for me though: why are you giving Taylor such a hard time over this but are giving a pass to Scarlet Yoshi and Helium3?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Could you enumerate what arguments you are referring to here Taylor?In post 170, Taylor wrote:We're not looking for justification to accuse you of being scum. We're looking for signs of your alignment. And all signs point to you being scum who is ticked off that he's gotten caughtfor what he perceives to be bullshit."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
firstly, this is an open setup, lol.In post 226, Obscurity wrote:
Susan (may I call you Susan?), I think you're overreacting. Stahp.In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@everyoneI don't really see good things coming out of a hydra slot that doesn't want to reveal themselves (re: Taylor). No way of reading the players or taking their town/scum games into consideration. Best to just lynch early imo.
How doIn post 73, XScorpion wrote:Oh god can you imagine if the scumteam is all 3 hydras?youknow how many scum there are?
unvote: Paschendalebased on post 94. Thanks for joining us.
By the bottom of page 7 I'm ready to kill both XScorp and Taylor. KNOCK IT OFF
then, I thought you voted pasch on that post and did not understand wtf made you do it and wrote like 3 paragraphs but then I noticed it is an UNvote and not a vote...damn you.
what don't you agree with in it? I think that post is very, very townie and is a good thinking post. yes, the whole 'quicklynch' notation is wrong, but replace it with policy lynch and/or just a vote - and it is correct. as I've already said, there are plenty of reasons not to say who are your heads as a hydra, and that overexaggarated push by pecan is definitely voteworthy, imo. hence my vote as well.In post 231, Grimgroove wrote:
I don't agree with this argument and I found the pecan-wagon more opportunistic looking than any other. Everyone on it is getting FOS'd.In post 102, Blueberry wrote:
The way I get it is that they decided not to disclose their identities before the game which, while could be useful if they were scum, is really not indicative of their alignment because they did not know their role at the time of making that decision. The fact that you suggest a quicklynch because them not disclosing their identities and preventing other players from metaing them is obviously scummy seems opportunistic and scummy to me.In post 69, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@everyoneI don't really see good things coming out of a hydra slot that doesn't want to reveal themselves (re: Taylor). No way of reading the players or taking their town/scum games into consideration. Best to just lynch early imo.
Vote: Pecanpie
Well, how town should act. I dunno, last time I played the setup I was scum, so I didn't care much and kinda tried to sabotage stuff there, but we also go lucky to hit the cop N1 and that was a nice win. so I dunno, first time as town in this setup.In post 232, Grimgroove wrote:
The setup is perfectly clear. This is an open game. What the hell is there to discuss?In post 110, XScorpion wrote:
I considered but decided that discussion of the setup is not helpful at this stage of the game and it is more productive to use this time scum hunting and not speculating.In post 106, shos wrote:eh, anyone has anything to say about the setup maybe?
will read further soonIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Absence makes the heart grow fonder <3In post 217, helium-3 wrote:shos and grovvey kid are standing out the most to me.
I'm here for you now."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Again: enumerate them.In post 219, Taylor wrote: There were very clear issues that were discussed that no one seems to be addressing.
T
The only way I see is you being in the comfortable position of having to defend yourself against a stupid argument on hydra-play. You enjoy delving into that because it's so comfortable but it doesn't make you more town. As much as the hydra-argument is a null-tell, so is your defense against said argument. But that's the only thing I saw you do. What arguments against Scorpion are you referring to?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
MAN this is such an awesome question to ask. I hate to say it, GG, but you're town again.In post 236, Grimgroove wrote:Could you point me to a game where you used meta in your scumhunt?
*sigh*
I have to say that taylor's repeated townclaims look bad.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
why the blueberry vote?
In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
The BlueBerry vote, well, there's not much to go on, he only posted once in 102.
First of all, I disagree with the argument. pekanpie never called for a quicklynch. That alone is of course not my reason to vote Blueberry.
He's basing his attack on a logical argument. The problem is the logical argument is actually a defensive one: the defense against the argument that mysterious hydras are scummy. It's easy to make an argument against this argument. But it's a bridge too far to use it as an attack as well.
Blueberry's post and vote don't look to me like the result of someone catching up with the topic, forming reads. It feels to me like scum looking for a logically sound reason to hop on a wagon. He didn't hunt for scum. He hunted for a pretense to vote someone and found it in Taylor's defense. He tried to spicen it up with a subtle misrep to boot."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
-
-
Blueberry Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: December 26, 2011
- Location: On a bush
Would you rather that I ignored that?In post 109, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@BlueberryWelcome to the party, or should I say welcome to two pages ago...
I'm neither voting nor pushing Taylor currently.
Taylor has been very confusing with her hydra stuff and I don't really like that she and scorp wasted like 5 pages bickering. It's not scummy though.In post 109, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@BlueberryI have heard of asking questions, thanks, you can start by giving me your opinion on Taylor? What, if anything, makes them town?
I really don't like the tone of Pecan's post though considering that I just misread some stuff.
Policy lynches are horrible though.In post 111, Paschendale wrote: This looks awfully full of obvious misrep to me. Pecan is not calling for a quicklynch. He's calling for what might be a policy lynch, but "early" pretty obviously means early in the game, as in days, as in don't wait for day 4, rather than a quicklynch without much discussion. And Pecan is right, lack of meta information does make it more difficult to get a read on them and thus denies town information. I don't think it's a lot of information that we're missing, but the charge of opportunism comes completely out of left field. There's no convenient or low risk vote at this point. We're on page 5, and it was page 3 at the time. The fourth vote on a wagon that is currently under discussion is hardly opportunism.-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
...seriously? Get in the game.In post 226, Obscurity wrote:In post 73, XScorpion wrote:
Oh god can you imagine if the scumteam is all 3 hydras?
How do you know how many scum there are?
Also can you like actually scumhunt instead of boo-hooing about having to read through the arguments? I don't like unvotes that aren't followed by new votes.
I could find an example if you are really really interested but trying to recall details of any game I played three years ago is a bit much to ask. That being said, I think you are mostly correct. Meta is something thatIn post 236, Grimgroove wrote:Could you point me to a game where you used meta in your scumhunt? You're making a big deal out of something I suspect you don't even employ in your towngames.
a) others are probably better at analyzing than I
b) I probably won't even bother using until lylo (when the whole game is behind us and everything can be looked at in perspective)
But that doesn't mean it's useless or that it shouldn't be an available tool.
Let me know if you want me to go dig through the old games and look.
Scarlet doesn't get as easy a pass as helium, butIn post 237, Grimgroove wrote:XScorpion, clarify this for me though: why are you giving Taylor such a hard time over this but are giving a pass to Scarlet Yoshi and Helium3?
1) I know exactly who helium is
2) I didn't have to harass Scarlet to do something as simple as sign posts with different names. I shouldn't have to.
Um, mysterious hydras ARE scummy. Mysterious ANYONE is scummy. I'm always suspicious of people who have something to hide, almost as much as people who dodge questions.In post 245, Grimgroove wrote:He's basing his attack on a logical argument. The problem is the logical argument is actually a defensive one: the defense against the argument that mysterious hydras are scummy. It's easy to make an argument against this argument. But it's a bridge too far to use it as an attack as well.
Speaking of which,
Try again?In post 247, Blueberry wrote:In post 109, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
@BlueberryI have heard of asking questions, thanks, you can start by giving me your opinion on Taylor? What, if anything, makes them town?
Taylor has been very confusing with her hydra stuff and I don't really like that she and scorp wasted like 5 pages bickering. It's not scummy though.-
-
XScorpion Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: August 15, 2009
If you want literally the first example I found,
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p2404091
where I identify Scott (correctly) as town based on meta.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.