Open 544: Tit for Tat (Game Over)

[Lincolm]

Vote : Ibarra

Yeah, I shot you at Ready, Aim, Fire! stage 2.

Statistics says that those who willingly vote in RVS are 75% likely to be scum than those who don't/are reluctant.

This make me want to vote you more.

[Lincolm]

Was that a RVS vote?

If what you mean by RVS vote I'm exactly random voting, no, I choose to vote you.

If what do you mean by RVS vote is random voting without information, yes, I am.

[Lincolm]

Nah, I concentrate with having fun in my life now. I wrote it like stupid person.

P-Edit : We just stuck at old meta, like threelane of DotA. /run

[Lincolm]

Oh anyway, I remembered something.

Unvote

Back to my game.

[Lincolm]

However, this statement does indeed break RVS. Let us generate discussion.

Probably the best comment because knowing what he intends to do, but I dislike this kind of comment.

What do you think about Ibarra?

[Lincolm]

Ok so this is me smashing a glass at my head for not realizing the way my statement doesn't make sense.

Which statement? I don't see any nonsense statement.

[Lincolm]

I like RVS, however, I don't like how you claimed "Statistics say" then you later admitted "Well guys, it's something I personally noticed"

So, you can't make your own statistic, heh? K K

Generally I find 2 ways to start a game

Someone just didn't even read.

Vote : Captain Picard

[Lincolm]

I do not like captain Picard. He is annoying. As such, I will place my vote on him.

vote captain Picard

How annoying = scummy?

BTW, anyone who attempts to RV now is definitely scummy, since there is already discussion and content. There should be no more reason to RV.

Vote : Ibarra

because I shot you. Yes, I was.

I just disagree about that.

MTD: Do you consider sheeping to be a scumtell?

Not necessarily but as town I would expect him to at least say that he is sheeping and not just come up with some poor reason

You read Flames as town?

=

Vote : Captain Picard

[Lincolm]

To answer Lincolms question, it seems that you are putting words into my mouth. In no where did I say that he was scummy, so the question was irrelevant. I put my vote on Picard because he was annoying.

Yes, I did put your own words into your mouth. You said to us "let's generate discussion", I assume you wanted us to out of RVS ofc, but basically doesn't have any questions. So I assume your vote at Picard is serious one.

Let's come from beginning. So, is that vote serious or just RVS?

Account is locked, so back for a minute. Not defensive, pointing out the fact I didn't sheep, and if they were actually looking for scum, I would think they would look at time stamps before coming up with some lol reasoning.

Seriously, no one said you're sheeping.

=

Eh sorry, I might be not paying attention now because I have my game now.

[Lincolm]

Just back from my game.

MTD: Do you consider sheeping to be a scumtell?

Not necessarily but as town I would expect him to at least say that he is sheeping and not just come up with some poor reason

You read Flames as town?

Forget it, I thought him was Flames. Dunno why.

Also, Tla didn't give reasoning for her vote, I did, anyhow

Doesn't mean we can't understand it.

Post 38 and 42, two different people, two people saying I look like scum for sheeping. Who isn't reading now? Lol, I need to quote people for next post but phone sucks for playing, so..

That's funny how I misinterpret "him" = I didn't read the thread. Cool story.

it feels like you're scared to admit you're wrong

I agree with this, but do you think this is alignment indicative or meta? (I think it is the latter btw)

[Lincolm]

No Stone Unturned (Varsoon + pieguyn hydra)

just saw this

damn that is one sexy hydra

Nope. It is terrible hydra. One of them should join with me to make that hydra.

@Lincolm I said if his statistics apply to him he should be 75% scum because he didn't rv. But he said RV = 75% scum.

I noticed it, but I thought that's an error at writing. I can see the logic behind that.

So, you can't make your own statistic, heh? K K

Sure you can, but in my post I explained why I didn't like it, he tried to pass it off as irrefutable evidence, then admitted lol-just my observations guyze!

Yeah, still, you can make your own observations as statistic. Never mind. Nothing important now, except you want to ask me.

So, that is 2 votes on me that look REALLY bad now, since your reasoning for them just got blown the fuck up.

This is bad, and if you're town, you should feel bad.

I'm undecided on both you and Ibarria yet, you are both leaning towards town, you moreso, but I just think in terms of town/scum, on a scale of 1 - 10, 1 being scum and 10 being town, you are probably a 7, Ib is a 5(null).

No one asked you for that also. And tbh, this is bad.

=

Vote : Celebloki

You guys should sheep me.

[Lincolm]

@Lincolm: Eh, where does that vote come from! As far as I see, nothing in your post hints at it, still you put an "=" before it as if it was the logical consequence...

Because I want lynch him ASAP?

Because he isn't doing anything. He only commented everything on general. Indeed, as town and as scum someone can do this, but I consider this as active lurking. Town or not, he deserve a wagon IMO because you know why.

@NSU

: ^

That's isn't logical consequence, I just use it as divider of my post. I use it because it is easy to read and use.

For NTU being a hydra,

I am seeing a serious fucking lack of participation here

What? I don't get this. I like you to elaborate this more, please? (Anyway, Singaporean?)

This is bad, and if you're town, you should feel bad.

care to explain why? while I agree it doesn't accomplish much it looks town motivated

I would agree that Flames's reason is "something" (though I consider because his newness), but discrediting vote with assumption and he think how his reason will be accepted by everyone are terrible. What I mean, scum can make a "reason" also.

The post that I quoted, at least it is sum everything I thought about him, he is opportunistic and survivalist as fuck. He is suspecting a person who vote him, seriously, which give me not-so-important scum ping at him. It can be a scum who scum-paint someone, but I don't think this is the scenario, probably.

Lincolm's stuff is a bit more, but it also looks more than it is contentwise, relevant statements are mostly, that some things from Picard are bad and a short conversation with Flames. And the there is that out-of-thin-air Cele Vote.

I don't like to explain when I'm not being asked (I thought Pieguy knows this? Nvm). Just saying.

how much experience do you have? you don't seem new 0.0

Is this relevant on my alignment? If not, why even ask?

Tbh, I'm hoping the cat out from his sack.

I'm thinking he is a VI, do you concur?

while I don't like calling people VIs I'm inclined to agree that although he looks scummy there's a good chance that can be attributed to him being new. so yeah

He is new.

=

it feels like you're scared to admit you're wrong

I agree with this, but do you think this is alignment indicative or meta? (I think it is the latter btw)

@Pieguy/NSU

: Answer please.

=

Dunno why, but both of you (NSU and Picard) are stuck in my head. Stop make noisy noise at my head. You guys are distractions for me.

Vote : Hopkirk

This guy is scum.