In post 341, Bulbazak wrote: In post 279, Tebow wrote:
Yup. IE, trying to actually ascertain her alignment, rather than just deciding to try to paint her as scummy. If I can't see a reason a
reasonable
person acting in good faith (ie, town) would interpret a post in a certain way, that usually leaves three options: you're unreasonable, you're pursuing a personal vendetta, and you're scum. I don't like calling people stupid when there are alternative hypotheses, and I don't have any meta suggesting personal animosity.
You're one of those players who try to see the good in every player, believes innocent until proven guilty, and ends up doing very little as a result, aren't you?
Since I'm attacking you, HARD, that seems like an odd thing to say.
In post 279, Tebow wrote:
Other players, please note Bulbazak baselessly asserting that his interpretation of her 'intent' is the same thing as her actual intent. Actually, I think they speak far more to the mindset that
I've
outlined.
Read back over her posts. The intent you outlined doesn't fit in with her actions.
Given that I read her posts, and that seemed the obvious interpretation of her intentions, I don't see why doing the exact same thing again would lead to me coming to the opposite conclusion. Also, people who are not bulbazak should note that this is another bare assertion on his part.
Never seen scum flail before?
Never seen accusations of being 'flailing scum' made toward town before? It's an incredibly common scumtactic to accuse people of 'flailing.'
In post 279, Tebow wrote:
She admits to wanting to shut down discussion on him. She says it's to protect her townread, but when pressed, she couldn't give an adequate answer why this should be the case, since she admitted to ignoring most of Garmr's posts. Then when she was called out on defending Garmr, she backtracks and said that she was defending herself by defending Garmr, which is BS. So go ahead and criticize my interpretation of that one sentence. It still doesn't change her actions, which happen to back up that interpretation.
This is a hugely uncharitable interpretation of what she said and did.
It's an accurate interpretation. Get out of your fluffy clouds of sunshine and rainbows and join us down here in reality.
It's a BULLSHIT interpretation. For it to be true, she'd have to be the stupidest scum who ever lived.
Bulbazak wrote:
She did say that! I can't help it if you want to sit there in your own little world and imagine there aren't people who kick kittens just for fun, but she did freaking say that!
LIAR! SHE DID NOT SAY THAT! YOU MISREPRESENTED HER AS SAYING THAT!