[4]
[3]
[2]
[1]
[1]
[2]
Deadline is in (expired on 2014-02-18 14:00:00).
Titus is V/LA Thursday through Saturday.
What attitude is that?mastin2 wrote:He's someone who quite easily could be town, and has an aura that overall feels town, but could easily be scum because of his attitude.
@ObsessedWithCats how am i not scum hunting ?In post 172, ObsessedWithCats wrote:doesn’t seem to be scumhunting
You're just listing names that mention you as scum, and threaten to self hammer at L-5.In post 178, Zekrom25 wrote:@ObsessedWithCats how am i not scum hunting ?In post 172, ObsessedWithCats wrote:doesn’t seem to be scumhunting
False.In post 181, jklash12 wrote:RVS is just about the only time when votes for no reason said are accepted.
Did you think you would have been suspected for keeping your RVS vote on someone?In post 181, jklash12 wrote:I was explaining why I was unvoting. My vote was useless because there was no purpose for it to serve and I had no reason for voting them. One vote isn't going to put enough pressure on someone to make them crack. RVS is just about the only time when votes for no reason said are accepted. Because we were done with RVS and my vote did not have a solid reason, I was taking my vote off until I found a reason to vote for someone.
the wifom. ugh.In post 184, jklash12 wrote:Possibly but I know if I was scum I would probably keep my vote on and lie low for a bit while you guys talked.
Ugh, more wifom logic. That does not make you anything.In post 189, jklash12 wrote:Zek that only makes me town because if I was scum, why on earth would I vote you after you encouraged scum to lynch you? If I was scum I would surely not vote for you after the post you made. Also points made earlier by others saying that the scum want to keep you in. This shows I'm not scum because I am willing of lynch you.
Actually, we aren't active lurking. I normally dislike this reason, but it's the truth so I'm going to flat out say it. We are a hydra which means we have two active heads. We are trying our hardest to keep any hydra dissonance out of the thread and we are communicating in a private QT.In post 173, Gooner wrote:VOTE: Shadowcat
ISO him, he's active lurking. He's my first scumread based off of a player who has got a midrange activity level but isn't really being controversial or getting involved in the game and is kinda blending into the background.
I see the hydra excuse as a possibility. Having never played as a hydra I imagine it's quite tricky getting your reads aligned so I do have a bit more sympathy. Of course I still want to actually see some evidence of scumhunting and I will be keeping an eye on him to make sure he doesn't slip back into active lurking at any point.In post 193, Titus wrote:Gooner, why do you have sympathy? Mala said, I'm scumhunting but you can't see it. Something pinged, but don't mention it in thread (cannot be verified) or which alignment. Mala can then go back to a post whichever way see sees fit.
Actually.. I am scumhunting in the thread?..In post 193, Titus wrote:Gooner, why do you have sympathy? Mala said, I'm scumhunting but you can't see it. Something pinged, but don't mention it in thread (cannot be verified) or which alignment. Mala can then go back to a post whichever way see sees fit.
Pisskop, without answering who, can you get any town reads from this? I see people being logically inconstient or obfuscating?
Jmo, why can't jklash just be new?
It's actually very annoying to read a game where hydra dissonance is rampant throughout a game thread. In fact it's scummy as hell and is one of the many reasons why so many players hate hydras so much and they have a bad reputation.In post 194, Gooner wrote:I see the hydra excuse as a possibility. Having never played as a hydra I imagine it's quite tricky getting your reads aligned so I do have a bit more sympathy. Of course I still want to actually see some evidence of scumhunting and I will be keeping an eye on him to make sure he doesn't slip back into active lurking at any point.In post 193, Titus wrote:Gooner, why do you have sympathy? Mala said, I'm scumhunting but you can't see it. Something pinged, but don't mention it in thread (cannot be verified) or which alignment. Mala can then go back to a post whichever way see sees fit.
You're surprised that not everyone wants to go for the low-hanging fruit? He may make a good compromise lynch but we're nowhere near that point yet. Hopefully we'll be able to get a better read on him before the end of the Day.In post 126, Titus wrote:@All, I am surprised at all the wagons that aren't Zekrom. That means there must be value to keeping Z in the game. There is no way that everyone who has acknowledged the Z wagon but went elsewhere is scum so what gives?
In post 2405, Dragon Alliance wrote:This is the Hydra of Beast and Zekrom.