NY 171: An Education in Telling Jokes (Game Over!)

pisskop · Post Post #1875 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:45 am

Then Who did you target, when, why?

Malakittens · Post Post #1876 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:47 am

In post 1875, pisskop wrote:Then Who did you target, when, why?

I used one shot and I used it on Mollie n1. She didn't go anywhere.

I haven't used my other yet. I was hoping we'd have a second scum flip so it make getting tells easier from there so I can use it like a cop-guilty.

pisskop · Post Post #1877 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:47 am

Mollie?

T/F?

pisskop · Post Post #1878 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:48 am

Also, we still need a hammerer.

Marquis · Post Post #1879 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:51 am

asdf zekrom had daytalk THE COACHING

want to hammer but the roleclaim is like. so into scummy it's towny? i think? but we just had a doctor rb and joat flip and like... so many prs

Malakittens · Post Post #1880 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:54 am

In post 1879, Marquis wrote:asdf zekrom had daytalk THE COACHING

want to hammer but the roleclaim is like. so into scummy it's towny? i think? but we just had a doctor rb and joat flip and like... so many prs

yeah I think the scum team could be a bit more experienced with the Zek thing.

Kinda why I'm looking a bit more at {UT, Nik, DN} as a deff scum member, but unsure which one, but I'm thinking Nik.

pirate mollie · Post Post #1881 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:02 am

In post 1865, Malakittens wrote:You are buddying life.

Yes, you voted me after I voted you. DON'T EVEN YOU VOTED ME AFTER I VOTED YOU AND THEN ATTEMPTED TO SELFVOTE AFTER THAT.

erm, no.

In post 1145, Malakittens wrote:
In post 1130, pirate mollie wrote:I didn't even remember you were playing.

I would feel wonderful lynching you I think.

VOTE: mala
nu.

VOTE: Mollie

try again

pisskop · Post Post #1882 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:03 am

Good enuff for me.

vote: malakittens

Porochaz · Post Post #1883 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:08 am

Hey Mala,

Did you forget it was a normal game?

Must suck a bit.

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Normal

So yeah limited shot - normal, tracker - normal, Encryptor - erm... well Mafia Encryptor is defined as normal...
All 3 together... yeah no.

I would have claimed NK Immune Miller Vig, it would have been more believable.

Also there is the fact that you still have vote love for mollie despite seeing her actively not move, the fact that, that role would be insanely powerful, again in no way a normal role.

HAMMAH PLEASE.

Malakittens · Post Post #1884 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:11 am

Yet somehow I have it ;-;

pirate mollie · Post Post #1885 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:15 am

stating intent to hammer

notty if you wanna talk get in here

also if mala flips scum I might help ut in his marquis crusade.

Porochaz · Post Post #1886 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:15 am

I admire the fact that you are sticking to the story. Most would have done the "Im a pissed off cop routine" by now.

Marquis · Post Post #1887 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:17 am

"New/variant roles may be included in limited number (no more than 1 in a Mini, 2 in a Large), and should be based on the usual role mechanics: Killing, Protecting, Investigating, Blocking, Voting, Enabling and Communication."

pedit i might help ut lynch himself too. or something

pisskop · Post Post #1888 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:18 am

Good. You're like, the scummiest thing since dreg :p

Malakittens · Post Post #1889 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:18 am

Poro, Mollie - I'm not scum ;-;

Pls don't lynch me

Porochaz · Post Post #1890 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:19 am

In post 1887, Marquis wrote:"New/variant roles may be included in limited number (no more than 1 in a Mini, 2 in a Large), and should be based on the usual role mechanics: Killing, Protecting, Investigating, Blocking, Voting, Enabling and Communication."

pedit i might help ut lynch himself too. or something

Tell me what mechanic would you put that role under?

Porochaz · Post Post #1891 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:20 am

In post 1889, Malakittens wrote:Poro, Mollie - I'm not scum ;-;

Pls don't lynch me

Oh, ok

unvote

Marquis · Post Post #1892 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:20 am

ok so like I don't even know where I stand right now on mala.

on one hand she defended zekrom quite a bit and lurked even more than that

but she could have been wrong-town (it seems like there are a lot of them this game) and the fact that she claimed what she did when she only would have needed to claim tracker... well

pedit enabling of course. mafia encryptor is a thing, so i don't see why town encryptor as one of the alloted variants wouldn't be allowed.

Marquis · Post Post #1893 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:21 am

i just really don't see mala claiming encryptor as scum

in we the purple she claimed survivor which was also a roleclaim-that-will-not-draw-any-sympathy and iirc she was what she claimed, and was playing the way she did here most of that time

Marquis · Post Post #1894 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:22 am

but then again i could see her claiming it because sthar's roleblocker claim didn't do him any favors either????

Marquis · Post Post #1895 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:23 am

and errrrrrrr

can we look back at who else wanted to lynch fish over zekrom because i kind of remember a few loud voices that aren't being called out for this now

Porochaz · Post Post #1896 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:24 am

You are now boring me with your extrapolation of the available data.

pirate mollie · Post Post #1897 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:25 am

In post 1889, Malakittens wrote:Poro, Mollie - I'm not scum ;-;

Pls don't lynch me

you had me as scum like 5 minutes ago and now you are treating me as town? lol

prozack wtf are you doing

Porochaz · Post Post #1898 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:26 am

vote mala

Just having a bit of fun.

Malakittens · Post Post #1899 (ISO) » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:27 am

I don't think you're town. Just trying to tell you to not lynch me.