Spoiler:
Private was at L-1 here on day 1 and Random goes out to advise against the wagon against Private.In post 142, Randomnamechange wrote:I don't think it is a good idea to have anyone at L-1 this early. Someone could quickhammer.
Gives a weird null on Private here. He says Private isn't scummy and he asks good questions. From that it sounds like he should be town but instead its a null. If someone is asking good questions, that would fall under the category of townie things.In post 145, Randomnamechange wrote:I'm getting a null read on Private. He has asked some good questions, but is laying fairly low. I just don't think he has done anything scummy, the read is more based on him not doing townie things.
This is a major one. He says we shouldn't lynch Private because he could be a town power role. Think about that for a second. Whenever you lynch anyone you run the risk of lynching a town power role because anyone could be a town power role. This is a terrible defense against a Private lynch but in his next post it gets even worse.In post 148, Randomnamechange wrote:Hang on a minute. We are lynching Private because he isn't very active. This is a terrible excuse. He could be innocent, or a town power role.
In his next post he takes the defense that Private could be a power role and uses it to defend why Private has been laying low/lurking and yet again say he hasn't done anything scummy.In post 151, Randomnamechange wrote:The reasoning for his lynch would also apply to a power role staying low. He hasn't done anything scummy.
Here he votes innocentvillager. As far as contributing you can't say Private contributed more than IV on day1. Then he takes back all the bad defensive stuff about Private because he was "tired".In post 157, Randomnamechange wrote:Vote IV
best vote we've got. Nothing contributed, and pretty survivalistic.
Dunno, why I said that stuff about Private, I was tired. Sorry about that.
Still defending Private when he didn't need to.In post 160, Randomnamechange wrote:Private has contributed slightly more by asking questions. Also, IV was oddly survivalistic.
(the rest of the quotes are day2. The ones before were all day 1)
Here is where on day2 Random goes to vote Private. Oddly he list no reasons of his own and just sheeps his ass on to dtd's reasons.In post 307, Randomnamechange wrote:Vote private
Same reasons as stated by dtd
Getting a strong town read on dtd, and a weak town on Jake.
In post 337, Randomnamechange wrote:GUYS PRIVATE IS AT LYNCH 1. DO NOT HAMMER YET.
These 2 quotes are trying to delay the Private lynch so that his scum partner has time to post and hopefully dig his way out.In post 352, Randomnamechange wrote:jklash, we still have a couple more days of discussion so don't hammer yet.
This is just 3 posts after his previous post. He has an uncalled change in mind to be satisfied with the Private lynch.In post 355, Randomnamechange wrote:I'm not sure, but I know DDD asked you questions that you didn't answer. I am satisfied to hammer Private now.
Then Jake questioned Random why he is asking for time for Private and this was his response where he says to hammer.In post 357, Randomnamechange wrote:He clearly isn't going to post. I have realized this and so have no problem with hammering. I have a decent idea of who is scum, but need to see the flip to see if I am correct. I think I am organized enough to proceed.
The main points of why Random is scum
-His defense of Private day1 with rather weak reasons and then takes it all back when questioned on it
-sheeps the Private wagon day2. Never says, himself, why Private is scummy.
-His trying to buy Private time to talk at the end of day2
-His weird change of mind between 352 and 355