With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.
Day 1 ends in (expired on 2014-06-17 09:00:00)
I'm gonna say I believe you, but I wanna yell SCUMFAKERY one more time anywayIn post 1353, SaintKerrigan wrote:After reading 30+ pages in one day and taking notes, you wouldn't want to see more spam posts either, right?
why?In post 1357, shos wrote:you guys would rather that I am killed right now instead of lynched.
who did I call scum apart from speedy?In post 1358, jasonT1981 wrote:VOTE: shos
Not been happy with him calling scum then not backing it up with anything
and how desperate can I be at L-5 when there's a larger wagon up there? lolIn post 1360, jasonT1981 wrote:why?In post 1357, shos wrote:you guys would rather that I am killed right now instead of lynched.
this seems like desperate attempt to stay alive with Appeal to emotion/WIFOM
1 who did you call scum without further backing it up... well we have exhibit AIn post 1361, shos wrote:who did I call scum apart from speedy?In post 1358, jasonT1981 wrote:VOTE: shos
Not been happy with him calling scum then not backing it up with anythingand how desperate can I be at L-5 when there's a larger wagon up there? lolIn post 1360, jasonT1981 wrote:why?In post 1357, shos wrote:you guys would rather that I am killed right now instead of lynched.
this seems like desperate attempt to stay alive with Appeal to emotion/WIFOM
how is this even AtE/wifom?
And Exhibit BIn post 1135, shos wrote:VOTE: JulsIn post 231, Juls wrote:My role PM doesn't specify when I can talk but I asked Zach and he said I can talk until he tells me otherwise.
The reason I claimed is because I knew the way I changed my mind looked bad from the outside. So I figured I would be lynched if I didn't explain my reasoning and I couldn't explain my reasoning without claiming. I guess I just didn't put as much faith in neighbors as I do masons. When I was suggesting giving up day talk I wasn't thinking about there being masons.
scum thought process found
>>>>right there<<<<
got it nailed it lets go dinner
As for how is it AtE/WIFOM
In post 1339, SleepyKrew wrote:Also I'm genuinely not sure if Not_Mafia should claim because idk if there's enough time and enough reasonable people for it to matter
In post 1342, Not_Mafia wrote:Okay, Skrew is probably right there, so because of my role and the chance of me being an NK is very low anyway, claim VT.
Apologetic about his play, acknowledges he was rubbish. Doesn't claim a good role. He clearly doesn't expect to live.In post 1342, Not_Mafia wrote:Okay, Skrew is probably right there, so because of my role and the chance of me being an NK is very low anyway, claim VT. Sorry for my rubbish/non-existent play this game, but a bulk of the thread has been egos butting heads and personal disputes and I've found it hard to generate any content in this
It's something I've been researching independent of this game, and this is the first opportunity I've had to share them.In post 1372, Sugoku Sugoi wrote:I do wonder though why Hoopla decided to look at the stats at this particular point. What was the thought process that led you decide "okay, N_M claimed VT, let me go find all the D1 claims and figure out how many are scum?"
This should not be forgotten in the event of a hoopla/not_mafia scum flip.In post 1372, Sugoku Sugoi wrote:I am not entriely sold on this and the paranoid part of me makes me think Hoopla told him to claim VT in their scum QT with daytalk.