![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
My actual intention was to see if any newbscum would actually sheep looking for an easy wagon. Didn't work out as intended but on the plus side we're past rvs and I got some good reads off it.
In post 97, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 96, Billi bilaði wrote:In post 92, VictorDeAngelo wrote:...
Because I think I said pretty clearly why I think you two are scum.
I'm pretty clear on why you think I am in the mafia (although I know you are barking up the wrong tree there), but it is equally unclear to me why you are putting T S O in the same category.
T S O votes for a player with the total of 1 post, who should be back from V/LA, and there isn't even a remote lynch danger from that vote.
Can you spell your reasons out for me?
You see the bolded. That's a pretty scummy thing to do.
In post 97, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 96, Billi bilaði wrote:In post 92, VictorDeAngelo wrote:...
Because I think I said pretty clearly why I think you two are scum.
I'm pretty clear on why you think I am in the mafia (although I know you are barking up the wrong tree there), but it is equally unclear to me why you are putting T S O in the same category.
T S O votes for a player with the total of 1 post, who should be back from V/LA, and there isn't even a remote lynch danger from that vote.
Can you spell your reasons out for me?
You see the bolded. That's a pretty scummy thing to do.
In post 101, RachMarie wrote:
Still working on getting back up to par but I still do not see a case for Doogal scum why are you pushing it so hard Vic? Are you even looking at other players? Do you have any town reads yet?
It is not enough to just complain about activity ask questions find out what people are thinking so you can figure out who is scum
In post 102, RachMarie wrote:Also vic gambits in newbie games usually fall flat and often just end up giving the player doing the gambit a nice big dollop of appearing to be scum
In post 104, T S O wrote:In post 97, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 96, Billi bilaði wrote:In post 92, VictorDeAngelo wrote:...
Because I think I said pretty clearly why I think you two are scum.
I'm pretty clear on why you think I am in the mafia (although I know you are barking up the wrong tree there), but it is equally unclear to me why you are putting T S O in the same category.
T S O votes for a player with the total of 1 post, who should be back from V/LA, and there isn't even a remote lynch danger from that vote.
Can you spell your reasons out for me?
You see the bolded. That's a pretty scummy thing to do.
no, it's not.
What exactly motivates me to do that as scum? How does it advance my win condition? It doesn't.
In post 97, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 96, Billi bilaði wrote:In post 92, VictorDeAngelo wrote:...
Because I think I said pretty clearly why I think you two are scum.
I'm pretty clear on why you think I am in the mafia (although I know you are barking up the wrong tree there), but it is equally unclear to me why you are putting T S O in the same category.
T S O votes for a player with the total of 1 post, who should be back from V/LA, and there isn't even a remote lynch danger from that vote.
Can you spell your reasons out for me?
You see the bolded. That's a pretty scummy thing to do.
In post 83, VictorDeAngelo wrote:...
Bill on the other hand is probably scum. He held off voting in 67 despite saying the post was suspicious, then right after Shadowez highlights what he didn't like about my post Bill eagerly rewrites it in 73 and only gets around to voting in 77.
...
Also SE advice; get more active. I know Rach is vla but the rest of you need to be doing stuff. Scum won't catch themselves. It also makes for a boring game (and if the game is boring players like myself will just replace out).
victor wrote:
My actual intention was to see if any newbscum would actually sheep looking for an easy wagon.
Doogal wrote:
FOS: Billi for running up the votecount on TSO to L-2 while knowing one of the votes was V/LA and can't get off.
In post 79, shaddowez wrote:TSO - Do you have any reads to give?You've thrown out random one-liners here and there, but nothing with any real meat to it...
In post 101, RachMarie wrote:...Who else are you looking at,both of us do agree on a town read on Doogal but what about the rest of the players are you so tunnel vision on me that you are missing the forest for the trees?
Still working on getting back up to par but I still do not see a case for Doogal scum why are you pushing it so hard Vic?Are you even looking at other players? Do you have any town reads yet?
It is not enough to just complain about activity ask questions find out what people are thinking so you can figure out who is scum
In post 123, Billi bilaði wrote:In post 79, shaddowez wrote:TSO - Do you have any reads to give?You've thrown out random one-liners here and there, but nothing with any real meat to it...
In post 101, RachMarie wrote:...Who else are you looking at,both of us do agree on a town read on Doogal but what about the rest of the players are you so tunnel vision on me that you are missing the forest for the trees?
Still working on getting back up to par but I still do not see a case for Doogal scum why are you pushing it so hard Vic?Are you even looking at other players? Do you have any town reads yet?
It is not enough to just complain about activity ask questions find out what people are thinking so you can figure out who is scum
I have seen a single read from each of you, and you're both pressing to get more reads from others.