In post 446, CooLDoG wrote:NOt to have multiple reads, but to have a read that you think is worth a lynch at this time and not vote him because you decided to vote a weaker read.
Oh, okay then - just point out where I called Majiffy a weaker read and I'll self vote. You got me - as long as you invent a stance and apply it to me.
In post 449, Dr Pants wrote:In post 440, Thor665 wrote:
Oh, snap, you're right. I didn't realize it was scummy to have more than one scum read, I should have hidden that thought from town to look townish - how foolish of me.
sooooo, do you plan on just telling me my questions are scummy due to timing or something, or do you plan on answering them?
I am planning to call your questions scummy - and since none of them were directed at me, no, I wasn't planning to answer any of them.