In post 589, Baezu wrote:I'm starting to see you point about jif scum, farside
jiffy is just arguing with people and calling it content.
edit, forgot to post this too.
In post 589, Baezu wrote:I'm starting to see you point about jif scum, farside
In post 596, Majiffy wrote:I'm not sure what your perspective on "scumhunting by logic" means. Please provide several examples.
While you're at it, please explain with your precious logic what the third option would be - given that you have already admitted you play in an alignment-obscure fashion - if not poor scum or gamethrowing town.
Soft-supporting a wagon is not something outside the realm of possibility for a scumbuddy. Especially one that is being voted by a charismatic player.
Considering I am trying to discern your alignment, I would argue it is very relevant to this game that you continue this line of discussion. Any further attempts to shut down discussion regarding your playstyle and the proper way to read you will be seen as a scumclaim.
If I am such a poor scumhunter, then why am I being scumread for the perception of not playing up to my standard? Again; you can't have it both ways.
In post 600, CooLDoG wrote:In post 589, Baezu wrote:I'm starting to see you point about jif scum, farside
jiffy is just arguing with people and calling it content.
edit, forgot to post this too.
In post 601, Anatole Kuragin wrote:
I'm not going to play the game for you - ISO me and find a post where I'm trying to use poor logic to mislead people, or my own comments are not logically consistent
In post 590, Anatole Kuragin wrote:
1) mafia inherently depend on logically inconsistent cases when scumhunting, or logically very weak, inconclusive cases because they are trying to paint a narrative that a player they know is town is actually scum - this is as opposed to scum hunting by behavioral tells, some of which can be useful but you can't reliably find scum with it, especially not later into a game. this includes things like finding a player unnecessarily nervous or defensive, or having sharp changes in tone
In post 590, Anatole Kuragin wrote:and my reads have been fairly transparent, I still think Marcrell & Messiah are scum like I've been saying.
In post 590, Anatole Kuragin wrote:
Ok. Would you like me to submit to the town the term papers I wrote that were reviewed in my ADHD testing and diagnosis?
In post 590, Anatole Kuragin wrote:
This kind of self-meta is useless banter to enforce an untenable position.
In post 606, Majiffy wrote:In light of the claim, I'm not moving my vote.
In post 612, farside22 wrote:In post 606, Majiffy wrote:In light of the claim, I'm not moving my vote.
Our you counter claiming? Yes I'm asking because if you say nothing day fucking 1 about and live to day 2 saying oh I wasn't cc'ing that claim I'd vote you till you were dead.
In post 608, Majiffy wrote:You can lynch me, but you'd better as hell sheep my reads when I flip town.
In post 214, Anatole Kuragin wrote:basically. don't see how rudeness is going to help us win the game
In post 618, Majiffy wrote:Am I a townread, Anatole?
In post 622, Anatole Kuragin wrote:In post 618, Majiffy wrote:Am I a townread, Anatole?
Compare for example how Majiffy and Messiah both respond to people "sheeping" their votes -
I vote for the same person as Majiffy (messiah) for reasons he sees as shit and he attacks me for it.
Farside completely agrees with Messiah's case against someone but don't immediately sheep the vote, and he practically begs her to.
one of these is much more likely a scum trait and one is more likely a town trait
In post 621, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Yeah, I'm sorry for being rude - but it's frustrating that you want to continue arguing in circles rather than winning the game and that got to me