p-edit:
In post 223, Lying Cat wrote:the playerlist. Like, half my ideal micro is in three slots.
I KNOW, RIGHT?!??!
In post 223, Lying Cat wrote:the playerlist. Like, half my ideal micro is in three slots.
In post 221, T S O wrote:In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB?
Since you came in and attacked me straight after I had began to attack him.
In post 221, T S O wrote:Clearly, if you felt JB was a good vote, you would not have done this.You don't have an opinion on JB, or on anyone, but you're still trying to tell me it was a bad vote.That's absolutely disgusting logic.
In post 221, T S O wrote:Yeah, I'm not going to let you pull this either.
There is no proof that you would have done this, other than your word.
In post 221, T S O wrote:This is why, in my opinion, you either can't read or haven't done so yet. I explained this to you before but you managed to miss it. Let's try again.
I did not "feel the need to vote within those three choices." I already had a scumread on Josh. This is documented. This was not a "best of bad choices" pick. This was me, at the time, picking my #1 scumread, and voting him. I was not voting within a group of choices.I was voting a scumread.Do you understand this complicated statement?
In post 227, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You could have voted in 138 if you thought he was scum. But you did it in 140.
In post 231, T S O wrote:In post 227, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You could have voted in 138 if you thought he was scum. But you did it in 140.
So, is this really the great and magical conclusion?
In post 225, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:TSO - my intention was never to insult you but I am having a really hard time understanding what your confusion is and I don't know how else to explain it any better.
In post 235, T S O wrote:In post 225, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:TSO - my intention was never to insult you but I am having a really hard time understanding what your confusion is and I don't know how else to explain it any better.
My problem, to sum it up, is that I feel that even though you justified the statement with "inherently it looks scummy" I still feel you -also- thought it was a poor answer, regardless of the stupidity of the question.
I'll admit I could be wrong here, but that was just how I saw it.
In post 237, Lying Cat wrote:That banter is super cute and all, but can we do something productive?
BBT, not being a fan of vanity wagons does not equal scum by any stretch.
Tell me about your own scumread on josh, from inception to fall. And where you know AP from. And who your biggest townread is.
-sthar
In post 242, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I just did something productive. TSO is scum...you don't see it?
I'm not scum-reading Josh.
I know AP from an ongoing game.
Biggest town-read is ZZZX.
In post 243, Lying Cat wrote:@AP are you townreading BBT?
In post 243, Lying Cat wrote:
Josh was your second vote of the game, and looking at VCs you were on the wagon at it's largest point. Are you saying that was a second random vote? Why did you leave it on so long?
In post 221, T S O wrote:In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB?
Since you came in and attacked me straight after I had began to attack him.
Clearly, if you felt JB was a good vote, you would not have done this. You don't have an opinion on JB, or on anyone, but you're still trying to tell me it was a bad vote. That's absolutely disgusting logic.
In post 223, Lying Cat wrote:(am I allowed to call you 'kiddo' now that you know it's not a pejorative or attack on your credibility? It really is a term of endearment from me, but I won't use it if you don't like it)
In post 240, T S O wrote:Because I wanted to know why specifically you thought the answer was bad and it felt like you were kinda snaking out of it.