Micro 381 - 999 Mafia (Nonary Game Complete)

[Bins]

Yeah, 34, I want you to play!

[xRECKONERx]

Never make this kind of post. If Akane had anything to say she already would've, all this does is draw attention to a player without giving any good reason to. It's scummy as heck.

You're bad and you should feel bad.

34, holy fucking shit, it's a goddamn game, relax. Wow.

Akane real scum actually so we're gonna do this now.

VOTE: Akane

[Parama]

i'm sorry reck.
wait, no i'm not.
and honestly you're not making me want to be sorry either.

[xRECKONERx]

[Jackel98]

Never make this kind of post. If Akane had anything to say she already would've, all this does is draw attention to a player without giving any good reason to. It's scummy as heck.

Why didn't you point Quilford out on this in post 60?

---

Also, 34, please don't leave. I honestly thought you were town... mostly. Anyways, if you feel you need to replace out, then do, and don't detract on your experience of mafia or ours. But if you have even the smallest bit of wanting to stay in, then please do. If you

are

town, and you end up winning it for us, then that'll be a moment to remember, and a great turn-around. And if you're scum, then don't leave your buddy stranded with a new partner. I've been there before, and it sucks.

[Parama]

There's a difference between asking for reads (aka forcing a player to do some scumhunting, or fake it (usually badly)) and drawing someone's attention to a specific person without reason
hint: one of them is pro-town, the other is not

[Bins]

Man, your condescending tone is really bugging the heck out of me.

hint: seriously

---

Also, 34, please don't leave. I honestly thought you were town... mostly. Anyways, if you feel you need to replace out, then do, and don't detract on your experience of mafia or ours. But if you have even the smallest bit of wanting to stay in, then please do. If you

are

town, and you end up winning it for us, then that'll be a moment to remember, and a great turn-around.

And if you're scum, then don't leave your buddy stranded with a new partner. I've been there before, and it sucks.

WHY ARE YOU TELLING HIM TO PLAY PROSCUM

not sure if fair and nice or

[ThirtyFour]

Will be back tomorrow.

[Jackel98]

Would you rather me tell a possible scum to play against their wincon? I'm not entirely sure if 34 is town, but I do know that I have stronger scumreads.

[Bins]

It's not against their wincon, it's just playing poorly, hehe. Unfair, y'know?

And like who? You aren't voting anyone.

[Jackel98]

When I posted that, I was thinking Parama, but then I re-read the game, and his intentions seemed town, as well as 34's, and Flame's. Reckoner, on the other hand, started seeming more scummy. It's a mild gut read, but his posts just seem off. Also, I tend don't want to vote on people that I'm not sure that I want to vote for. I'd rather keep my vote on a strong read for a while than keep switching it between weak reads. That way my vote holds more meaning, both as a pressure tool and as a show of how much I'm suspicious of someone.

[xRECKONERx]

gut read, but his posts just seem of

Man it's a good thing we're not like way past the point where having "gut reads" and posts seeming "off" are acceptable justifications for reads, right

[Parama]

Man, your condescending tone is really bugging the heck out of me.

hint: seriously

ok

When I posted that, I was thinking Parama, but then I re-read the game, and his intentions seemed town, as well as 34's, and Flame's. Reckoner, on the other hand, started seeming more scummy. It's a mild gut read, but his posts just seem off. Also, I tend don't want to vote on people that I'm not sure that I want to vote for. I'd rather keep my vote on a strong read for a while than keep switching it between weak reads. That way my vote holds more meaning, both as a pressure tool and as a show of how much I'm suspicious of someone.

1. Which posts, why?
2. Keep your vote on your strongest scumread, always. If you're voting no one you're admitting to having no scumreads. We already went over why not using your vote is bad.

[Jackel98]

1. What do you mean which votes?
2. You went over why not voting because of derphammers is bad.

[Parama]

1. Posts. Not votes. You say some of Reck's posts are off, but don't point to any.
2. No, I didn't? We already went over this re: 34 not voting earlier. I don't think I specifically said it but I know someone did. Why you should be using your vote, that is. Always.

[Akane Kurashiki]

@Jackel: Have you played with Reck before? And can you elaborate on your reads please? (Flames, 34 = town, Reck = scum?)

[Zero the Ninth]

LYNCH VOTE

Bins (0) -
Akane Kurashiki (2) - Not_Mafia, xRECKONERx
Quilford (0) -
Flames682 (1) - Quilford
Parama (1) - ThirtyFour
Not_Mafia (1) - Bins
xRECKONERx (0) -
ThirtyFour (2) - Akane Kurashiki, Parama
Jackel98 (0) -

Not Voting - Jackel98, Flames682

DOOR VOTE

Bins -
Akane Kurashiki -
Quilford -
Flames682 -
Parama -
Not_Mafia -
xRECKONERx - [Akane Kurashiki, Flames682, ThirtyFour - 5], [Quilford, Parama, xRECKONERx - 6], [Bins, Not_Mafia, Jackel98 - 7]
ThirtyFour -
Jackel98 -

Current Plurality - [Akane Kurashiki, Flames682, ThirtyFour - 5], [Quilford, Parama, xRECKONERx - 6], [Bins, Not_Mafia, Jackel98 - 7]

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch (5 to No Lynch). Deadline will be Friday, August 29th at 4pm EST.

[Akane Kurashiki]

wait what

Bins, why are you still voting N_M? Is that still purely random or is there a reason to it now? And do you have any reads?

[Bins]

Nooooo reason.

I'll address my reads tomorrow. I've actually been restricted to mobile, so I plan to make a longer post when I get computer access to sum things up.

Which is kind of sad cause Flames is due for a prod.

Quilford, when you said you'll look into them later, what did you mean? I was expecting a follow up post.

[Parama]

MOD: I should be voting both Flames and ThirtyFour, no?

Also, Flames is posting elsewhere and not here, which is the only kind of lurking that actually matters. Which worries me.

[Not_Mafia]

gut read, but his posts just seem of

Man it's a good thing we're not like way past the point where having "gut reads" and posts seeming "off" are acceptable justifications for reads, right

Gut reads exist, what's the big issue with this?

[xRECKONERx]

Saying someone is scummy because of "gut" and "posts seem off" when it's your only evolving read is very bad

[ThirtyFour]

Sorry, coming back isn't working...

@ Mod: Replace me, please.

[Parama]

Apparently I have to revote to use my doublevote. Mildly annoying.
VOTE: Flames682
VOTE: ThirtyFour

[Bins]

Sorry, coming back isn't working...

@ Mod: Replace me, please.

I see you're replacing out of all of you games..