Micro 376: Chosen Mafia - Game Over = Perfect Town Win
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
I'd prob veto GG. Mainly because I think AP is considered to be quite a good player across the site so I would like to be able to NK him in confidence. Also because I don't know many of the other players either.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 51, awestfie wrote:
I'm really not liking your posts, so far; and I don't have to point at them; because I genuinely just don't like any of your posts, up to this point.
When and why did this read change?-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 131, awestfie wrote:But, since he pointed it out to me that most of his posts were drivel; I've changed my mind on it. (Read 55 and 110.)
BBT, I'm curious as to what reads you've, right now?
You couldn't determine for yourself that their posts were drivel? I'm struggling to believe that.
Don't have many reads yet, will accumulate them as I participate in the game more.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 138, T S O wrote:Aren't you still calling me scum?
I mean, I don't think a Flubber-TSO team is -at all- likely, but you seem to think it is.
Why is a TSO-Flubber scum-team so unlikely?
So because someone says 'Hey, scum is x,y or z' you feel the need to vote one of those three choices? You can't make your mind up for yourself? You don't think scum exists outside of those three people?-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 144, T S O wrote:
I obviously know I'm Town.
Aside from that, Flubber's entrance of calling me scum, wildly misinterpreting my posts and then backing down is so blatantly not-partner.
That's right. You 'know' you're town. I don't. You're also right with the Flubber thing, I mean, I've never seen newbscum badly try to bus their partner and then back off at the start of the game. Never.
That totally rules you two out of being a scum-team. /sarcasm
I thought you were implying there was some sort of associative tell you were using that says you and Flubber could not be scum. I'd just policy lynch your ass for using associative tells with next to no information. I wanted clarification.
In post 144, T S O wrote:I didn't like Josh.
GG didn't like Josh either.
I voted Josh, because he is really the only person I'm scumreading atm (excluding you).
What part of this do you feel is problematic?
In post 142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You don't think scum exists outside of those three people?
I specifically said I did not think the other two were scum - so yes, it seems fairly obvious I do.
Hmm. I feel like you know what I meant by my post. So either you're playing dumb, or your reading comprehension isn't very good.
The bold part is exactly what I was getting at. If you're scum-reading me, why are you happy to go with what seems to be other people's choices of a lynch as opposed to your own? You should try to think independently, otherwise, you look like scum. You're welcome.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 154, T S O wrote:I disliked your first post a lot.
I also disliked your second post a lot.
You seem to be chainsawing me for voting Josh.
Hence, a Josh-BBT scumteam is my best guess right now.
Do you have an issue with the logic I'm using?
How can you dislike a RVS post?
Second post was fluff, adding to all the previous fluff.
Nah, I haven't even decided if you're town or scum yet. I was questioning some of your posts; am I not allowed to this without being considered scum? Are you one of those really defensive type of people?
Other than that, your logic is good.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 156, T S O wrote:Of course not. I have no problem with being questioned; however, the manner in which you did it is the problem.
The 'manner in which I did it' would infer that you're referring to my playstyle as opposed to the content. Can you clarify?-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 158, T S O wrote:The manner in which you did it has nothing to do with your playstyle; rather, your alignment is what I'm calling into question.
I can clear this up for you. I'm town.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 179, Heartless wrote:
Personally, I somewhat dislike BlueBloodedToffee's random unvote in Post 153 (link) and his reactions to TSO's questioning seem very nervous.
Not so random when you see the votecount right above my unvote.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB? Please note the quotes below (in particular the bolded sections);
Spoiler: What BBT actually said
Note the use of plurals. This would imply that had TSO voted for JB, ZZZX or FN I would have asked the same question. I thought my stance on the situation and the direction my questioning was coming from was fairly obvious, my bad, it clearly wasn't.
I mean, at first I thought this was some sort of reaction test you were trying but I'm beginning to think you're purposefully trying to misrepresent my posts.
You still didn't answer this either.
In post 160, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Also, I'm not satisfied.
Why exactly did you feel the need to;
a) vote within those three choices
b) vote there and then
You're grasping here and you're misrepresenting me pretty badly.
VOTE: TSO-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 221, T S O wrote:In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB?
Since you came in and attacked me straight after I had began to attack him.
Since I came in and attacked you over making a bad vote. Fixed that for you.
In post 221, T S O wrote:Clearly, if you felt JB was a good vote, you would not have done this.You don't have an opinion on JB, or on anyone, but you're still trying to tell me it was a bad vote.That's absolutely disgusting logic.
How is it? I have explained why it was a bad vote, it wasthe situation and the circumstancesin which you voted that I had a problem with. Not the person you voted for.
In post 221, T S O wrote:Yeah, I'm not going to let you pull this either.
There is no proof that you would have done this, other than your word.
I mean, I don't know how I can make this any more clear. Do you see the stuff I bolded? Do you see how it may be relevant to what you're saying here? Do you see how I can't go back in time (edit) my posts to make it look this way in light of what you're accusing me of?
The proof is right fucking there. Inbig, black bold letters.
In post 221, T S O wrote:This is why, in my opinion, you either can't read or haven't done so yet. I explained this to you before but you managed to miss it. Let's try again.
I did not "feel the need to vote within those three choices." I already had a scumread on Josh. This is documented. This was not a "best of bad choices" pick. This was me, at the time, picking my #1 scumread, and voting him. I was not voting within a group of choices.I was voting a scumread.Do you understand this complicated statement?
OK. So you were scum-reading me and JB and you just happened to vote within the lynch pool offered as opposed to somebody else outside of the pool. I guess if he was your '#1' scumread at the time that's a good reason.If.
Why did you not vote for JB before you were offered this lynch pool of players?-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
So yeah, I'm gonna go back and ask this question again which you seem to think you have answered but you actually haven't. Twice.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 231, T S O wrote:In post 227, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You could have voted in 138 if you thought he was scum. But you did it in 140.
So, is this really the great and magical conclusion?
Nah. Just a small slice of your scum pie.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 237, Lying Cat wrote:That banter is super cute and all, but can we do something productive?
BBT, not being a fan of vanity wagons does not equal scum by any stretch.
Tell me about your own scumread on josh, from inception to fall. And where you know AP from. And who your biggest townread is.
-sthar
I just did something productive. TSO is scum...you don't see it?
I'm not scum-reading Josh.
I know AP from an ongoing game.
Biggest town-read is ZZZX.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 243, Lying Cat wrote:
Josh was your second vote of the game, and looking at VCs you were on the wagon at it's largest point. Are you saying that was a second random vote? Why did you leave it on so long?
It was intended as something to try and get the game going. The quick-lynch comment was tongue-in-cheek.
I completely forgot I had voted for him. Hence the unvote after VC from Mod.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
So ZZZX and GG are town.
Leaning town on Josh.
Null on FN. Catch-up posts are so easy to make and pretty much always look pro-town so it gets ignored as far as being alignment indicative. Would like to see more.
Null on awestfie, I need to see some more, gut is telling me something is wrong here.
Need to ISO heartless/LC coz can't get a read on either for some reason.
TSO is scum. Surprised he is still alive.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 407, Flubbernugget wrote:Well yeah the catch up post is town looking, but theres nothing in there for you to springboard off of?
I don't like this. At all. The catch-up post is 'town looking'. I feel like that's a slip.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 303, Josh_B wrote:
TSO, if you are town, we are going to have to work together this game. How do you want to play that?
Why do you keep doing this?
---------------------------------
Heartless' 'meltdown' was weird. Didn't feel genuine at all and I'm really not sure why it was so OTT either.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 484, Wickedestjr wrote:Happy birthday BlueBloodedToffee! Everyone, wish him a happy birthday.
(Today's vote counts have been added.)
Thanks Mod!Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 504, Heartless wrote:
I'm sure Anti has something to say about this (none of it positive).
But are you going to say anything about why or are you going to leave it to everyone's imaginations?
-TTH
The fact it was so OTT made it feel not genuine. I mean, FN had one vote on him and you were going ballistic because somebody didn't agree with your read on a wagon that had barely got started. The whole situation just felt off.
I don't like this growing wagon on FN. Lynching the most inexperienced player; smells like scum looking for an easy lynch so they can get to their kill.
In post 506, Heartless wrote:
If you want to talk over the top bitterness, I see a lot coming from TSO for not much reason.
Not sure if this was addressed to me or not but will respond anyway. My vote is already on TSO, not sure how long it's going to stay there though.
It's more than asking people questions though isn't it. It looks like buddying, you're asking people for direction instead of trying to figure the game out for yourself. Three separate people as well, so it's not like you even care who it is, just so long as someone is helping you.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
I have to be honest and say I'm struggling with Heartless and it's kind of frustrating me now.
Some of their posting strikes me as town but I can't shake this bad feeling and I think it's mainly from the attack on FN (which does actually include some good points). It just seems such an easy lynch to go after though and it's not sitting right. I'm gonna need some more time.
Town
GG
awestfie
ZZZX
FN
LC
Heartless
JB/TSO
ScumMeta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
@531 I'm sorry. So, because someone's reads don't align with mine that means they're scum? Damn, I need to learn how to play this game.
ZZZX stating intent to L-1? Wtf is that about?Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 560, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:That isn't what I said.
I said your suspicion of Heartless for pushing Flubber is ridiculous when you are strongly townreading the other 2 people who supported a Flubber push.
My reads on yourself and awestfie are not solely based on the FN wagon/suspicion. The only player I'm strongly town-reading is you, hence the gap before awestfie and ZZZX.
I am struggling to read Heartless. I am getting the majority of my read from their push on FN, which I think is a bad wagon.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 617, T S O wrote:You're so opportunistic.
You vote me and call me obvscum, my wagon dies, you white knight one wagon and then you immediately jump on the other?
This makes no sense.
How was my vote on you opportunistic? I believe I was second on your wagon; was it because I voted for you after ZZZX provided a very insightful, thoughtful and pretty solid case on you and I voted you whilst providing no reasoning whatsoever of my own? Because unless that happened, you're going to have to explain to me how that was opportunistic.
I think if there is one opportunistic (and easy) wagon to get on it is the FN wagon. So, yeah, you're going to have to explain this for me because what you just said is a flat out lie.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 620, Heartless wrote:>the criticism of the flubber wagon (even though precisely ZERO fuckingscumreads came from the wagon)
>the irritatingly long time it's taking to waffle on us
>the vote parking on TSO (a zero accountability vote) for the longest time
and now...
>the random jump onto lying cat with no reads progression following from recent posting
lying cat wasn't anywhere near the flubber wagon. if you want to sit here andswear up and fucking down that the flubber wagon was on scum, then your scumreads should follow from that,but they don't
it's flubber/bbt scumteam
gg
OK.
I'm leaning scum on you from your attack on FN. You can see that from the reads list I provided so I'm not sure why you don't think I got any scum-reads from that wagon.
I'm waffling on you? I don't even know what to say...
I don't usually like to move my vote around a lot. I guess I could have unvoted but meh. I'm not sure how leaving my vote on TSO if a wagon is going nowhere is a scum-tell though.
There has been no progression on my read on LC. They're null.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 628, Heartless wrote:
oh? so are you "leaning scum" on lying cat now or what? (also "leaning [anything]", is a completely meaningless term that justifies a soft push)
Nah, LC is null. Said that in my previous post I believe.
In post 632, Heartless wrote:>flubber's wagon is "easy" (even though it magically disintegrates) but bad boy lying cat wagon is all cool
>lying cat isn't even a scumread
>josh is a scumread and abunchof people talk about him being scum, buti'll never vote him
>flubber's wagon wassoooooooooooooscum driven, but maybe it's not because there's some good points, but heartless is "leaning" scum becauseblahablhblahlkdjsaf;jds;lkajf;lkdsajf;lkdsaj;lkfdsajfsalk; /farthe chose to go after an easy lynch.
seriously, BBT's "reads" are a big, tangled, fucked up web that doesn't connect to theactions(the vote patterns).
forget logic. the simple fact of the matter is that he's not pushing the lynch that follows from his reads (josh), he's pushingalynch.
Flubber was an easy target for a lynch, I don't even know why this is being debated. I also don't know why you keep saying it 'magically disintegrated' or language along those lines. Is that somehow relevant?
Correct. LC is not a scum-read.
Josh is a scum-readbut notfor the reasons you have decided it was for. More later.
I feel sure Flubber's wagon was scum-driven; scum can bring up valid points just as well as town can.
You're right, I'm not pushing a lynch on one of my scum-reads right now. Can't disagree with that.
In post 633, Heartless wrote:actually, i misspoke earlier.
joshwas the scumread that came from the flubber wagon.
so what is it? what's the reason?
Josh was a scum-read for his buddying and looking for direction in the game. I'm sure you already knew this though; but given it doesn't fit into your case, it can be disregarded right?
If I say the reason, it kind of defeats the object of my vote. Which I no longer care about, so...
I voted LC to try and run her up and see if I could get a better read from their reaction to a growing wagon on them.
I am a little tentative to take you on in this game because of the respect you get from the other players, but fuck it. I'm going with it now. I think I'm right and I'm gonna do it.
VOTE: HeartlessMeta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 648, Heartless wrote:
...that's evenmorenonsensical...
so, now you're going to sit here, nitpick at me, and deny that him being on the flubberwagon was a factor at all, even though it should clearly be from your opinion of "flubberwagon was so scummy"
i'm done with you. your scummy colors have already shown.
I gave you my reasons for why I was scum-reading Josh. You tried to suggest it was for other reasons so that they fit into your now falling apart case. That is misrepresenting and misleading.
The flubber wagon was scum-driven.Scum-driven. Am I scum-reading GG? No. Am I scum-reading awestfie? No. A lot of my read on you came from that attack on FN and now this awful case you have tried to put together on me.
I'd be done with me as well if I realized I'd just made a pretty bad move.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 654, Heartless wrote:like, seriously
ask him why he didn't vote Josh.
the answer so far is "well I wasn't scumreading josh for [reason X you said], it's because of [reason Y you didn't say]."
that doesn't answer the question AND THAT'S NOT A TOWN RESPONSE
Are you serious? Are you actually being serious right now?
In post 639, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I voted LC to try and run her up and see if I could get a better read from their reaction to a growing wagon on them.
I was trying to develop a null read before progressing with the game. If I'd have said 'Hey LC, I don't think I'm looking to lynch you so don't worry about my vote; I'm just looking for your reaction to see if it helps me gain a read on you'. I'm not sure it would have had the desired effect.
The voting for Josh comments are in direct response to your bullshit case. It has nothing to do with my reasoning for voting/not voting. Again, you're being misleading.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 657, Heartless wrote:did i ask about lying cat?
did i mention lying cat?
am i now talking about lying cat?
am i talking about a pressure vote?
no.
why was your vote never (and continues to not be) on josh?
Yes.
Yes.
I don't know?
Umm, I don't know?
I thought TSO was scum. Further down, I also developed a scum-read on Josh. It's highly unlikely that both Josh and TSO are scum, one is town and one is scum is where I'm at right now. Before I switched my vote from a 'lead wagon' to Josh, I wanted to try and develop a read on LC. You present awful case on me after trying to push through an easy lynch accompanied with a meltdown. Combining these two aspects leads me to believe you're probably scum.
So now, my vote is on somebody I feel sure is scum.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 660, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:
Heartless - [1] - BlueBloodedToffee
No.
@BBT: Heartless is town. You're very clearly OMGUS-voting them. There's no other reason as far as I can tell. If you want to talk about "wagons that aren't going anywhere" - you're on one.
Scum know who the chosen townies are. I feel heartless' whole case is fabricated; I seriously doubt I was veto'd before the game.
This feels right. If other people read his case on me and my response to it and don't want to lynch him then I'll see where I want to go from there.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 662, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Yes, that's why he's pushing anything that has the faintest scent of scum. Because he's scum pushing (more than 2) chosen townies. /sarcasm
Your resistance to the Flubber wagon is suspicious whether you want to believe it or not. You jumping onto Heartless because they pointed this out is suspicious whether you want to believe it or not.
Do I agree with his suspicion of you? Not really. Do I think that makes him scum despite everything else they've done thus far? Absolutely not.
Your vote on Heartless is not only a bad vote in terms of who it's on, but it's not doing anything.
ETL
Aside from FN and myself, who do you think he has pushed?
If nobody else agrees with me and it looks like my vote is wasted, I will consider my other options. I'm not going to sit on him for the rest of D1 if nobody else is going to believe me.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 665, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:You're not evaluating their play as a whole. You're only reacting to Anti's vote on you.
I have already said I was struggling to read Heartless before the attack on FN. All I am using to base my read on them is their attack on FN and then their case on me.
In post 667, T S O wrote:"I developed scumreads on both Josh and TSO. I knew they couldn't be scum together, though, so Ibegan to talk to both of them and did my best to determine which one of them was scumvoteparked on TSO for ages, before Isorted TSO as town/scumvoted Joshsorted Josh as town/scumopportunistically voted some other person after they called me scum."
How are you not voting this guy, ETL?
Everything I do is opportunistic to you. Please tell me how my vote on Heartless is opportunistic. Please.
In post 668, Josh_B wrote:
I have been waiting for you to say this for a while.
I'm going to take your hesitation as a town tell. And I'm going to take anti calling you out on it as a town tell too.
Umm, I said it here;
In post 514, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
It's more than asking people questions though isn't it. It looks like buddying, you're asking people for direction instead of trying to figure the game out for yourself. Three separate people as well, so it's not like you even care who it is, just so long as someone is helping you.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 746, T S O wrote:What's your stance on GG vs LC again, BBT?
GG is town. I don't really get LC's attack on them but I don't feel like it's coming from a scum perspective. I feel like LC genuinely believe what they're posting, especially in relation to ETL's reaction to them doing so. So I'm thinking it's town vs town.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 759, ZZZX wrote:can you guys take a look at shreddies mafia and compare it here and tell me the result. Is BBT's play here the same as there?
See sig for meta.
Last time you lurked you were scum ZZZX, what's up with that?Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
I am a reactive player, it seems a bad playstyle for this site from what I have seen so far but it's how I play. Keeps getting me into trouble.
I always intended to vote Josh. However, I was struggling to read LC and wanted to see if I could help get a wagon going and then gain a read from their reaction to it or even to the wagon itself.
I'm not convinced Flubber is town at all, I'm convinced that was the easiest wagon/lynch to push in the game, and I didn't like it. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 775, Heartless wrote:
Sorry, that's not good enough. Anti wouldn't take that for an answer and I won't either.
Are you even thinking about it much yourself? It doesn't look like it. It looks like you just want to dig your heels in and stick to your story. Is it because you're town who can't get past his own ego? Or is it because you're scum and you have to look decisive to avoid appearing weak?
Either way, it's fairly annoying and I wish you would just spit it out already.
-TTH
I haven't given much thought to Flubber no, paid more attention to the wagon on him.
Nah, I change my mind all the time. For example, I'm pretty sure you're town now and thus feel silly for voting you earlier.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 779, TellTaleHeart wrote:In post 777, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I haven't given much thought to Flubber no, paid more attention to the wagon on him.
You can't be serious. That read was the linchpin of your argument that we were scum, but now we're hearing that you haven't given much thought to Flubber himself?
Unbelievable
I'm deadly serious. I paid more attention to the growing wagon than the player himself. This was pretty obvious I thought...Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 799, Flubbernugget wrote:
Do I have to explicitly state every thing I didn't like about awestfie's or Josh_B's play is a scum tell?
Yes. Or are you expecting people to blindly believe what you say?Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 801, Josh_B wrote:
.. had a chance to vote a scum read,
...called the wagon too fast.
.... still scum reading the said person.
What are you talking about here?Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
VOTE: Lying Cat
GG is a bad lynch. Had a good town-read on them for pretty much the whole game but I don't like their recent posts so much. Seem paranoid of absolutely everyone. In saying that, I am absolutely not willing to lynch GG or awestfie today. Like, at all.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 841, Lying Cat wrote:Compromise time.
Of those discussed, I'd rather lynch BBT than flubber because I'm mad at him and his vote is atrocious.
But BBT doesn't have the votes right now.
I'll be on again before deadline if you guys decide you want a better lynch.
VOTE: flubber
I'd much rather lynch Josh than yourself but that doesn't look like happening. If Josh's wagon picks up somehow, I'll be on it in a flash.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Stating intent to hammer.
I'll be able to consistently check this before deadline. I want to give it about an hour just to see if the Josh wagon takes off (it's doubtful, but I'm really not happy with this wagon)Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Willing to lynch Josh or ZZZX today.
Your recent posts are awful ZZZX. Voting someone if they scum-read you and then retracting that vote if they town-read you...wtf?Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 960, Josh_B wrote:If you considered how much Flubber wanted to lynch me, I think you would reconsider your targets for today. And this...
I didn't see FN pushing you all that much. He did leave his last vote on you though so I'm not sure what that means.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 963, Josh_B wrote:
If you don't think he pushed me all that much than you need to re read the game. His vote means that he wanted to lynch me, that's what votes mean.
Ohhhhh, I see. So you're a conf. townie because he left his vote on you? I understand now. [/sarcasm]Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
In post 987, Josh_B wrote:
BBT kind of picked up exactly where he left off yesterday with out considering any of the game.
What is there to consider?
I don't think scum bussed D1. Yourself, ZZZX and awestfie were off the FN wagon. Given I am town-reading awestfie, that leaves me with yourself and ZZZX.
I would prefer to lynch you over ZZZX, but I'm not too fussed either way really.Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK
-
-
BlueBloodedToffee Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 23692
- Joined: April 10, 2014
- Location: Liverpool, UK