Open 573: C9++
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 66, wgeurts wrote:Guys what the heck, if we go for a random lynch we could end up killing a special. I suggest we go for a.no lynch to give the specials one night (if they are there) to start their work. Also if we all just bandwagon the Scum could just hide and join it. What do we learn with a town death?
Little.
VOTE: No Lynch
Oh man if deathstare flips mafia you are in for it-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 149, sthar8 wrote:I don't care if you think I'm town.
But as an intellectual exercise: why would I refuse to explain my reasoning as scum?
I'm not scum explain it to me.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 154, sthar8 wrote:@nero- i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious.
This doesn't slide with me. Serious vote, but later you give reasons that could be applied to ANYONE. Looks more like a lotto-pick vote. Your last line admits that you don't really have a scum read on Nero, and you are waiting to see if he drops one.
VOTE: Sthar8-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 166, sthar8 wrote:Also wtf fox? what part of "here's why i'm not giving reasons" did you translate to "here are my reasons?"
In post 154, sthar8 wrote:@nero- i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious.
Can someone else give me an opinion on this.
"I wont tell you why I seriously voted you"
"I voted you for reactions"
"Wait I still haven't given any reasons!"
Actually, if your post 154 wasn't providing reasons what was the point of it ? I literally cant see anything other than vague reasons for a serious vote.
You say you wont tell scum why you voted.
Are you calling me scum by not giving your "real" reasons?-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 191, sthar8 wrote:In post 180, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 166, sthar8 wrote:Also wtf fox? what part of "here's why i'm not giving reasons" did you translate to "here are my reasons?"
In post 154, sthar8 wrote:@nero- i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious.
Can someone else give me an opinion on this.
"I wont tell you why I seriously voted you"
"I voted you for reactions"
"Wait I still haven't given any reasons!"
Actually, if your post 154 wasn't providing reasons what was the point of it ? I literally cant see anything other than vague reasons for a serious vote.
You say you wont tell scum why you voted.
Are you calling me scum by not giving your "real" reasons?
reading comprehension is tech.
Just explain yourself itsn't that hard if you're town.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 211, sthar8 wrote:
Not hard.
Irksome.
Having to read the thread to you isso annoying.
And I can't be bothered right now. But I'll have some free time later, so sit on your hands and be patient.
Ok I guess it is hard for you.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 224, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 222, sthar8 wrote:In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Ok I guess it is hard for you.
What do you do professionally?
star how is this in any way shape or form relevant?
I think he is trying to line me up for a joke that takes my intelligence into question.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 229, sthar8 wrote:In post 224, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 222, sthar8 wrote:In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Ok I guess it is hard for you.
What do you do professionally?
star how is this in any way shape or form relevant?
I need to know whether I'm addressing a spoiled child or an entitled prick.
Textbook strawman.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 235, sthar8 wrote:
Yes, including the candyland nursery-school handholding for fox. Assuming he doesn't justexplodefrom not getting his way RIGHT NOW DAMMIT.
Im actually about to explode as I'm typing this. Pls rspnd.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 243, davesaz wrote:
Noted for future reference. I won't spoil your interaction by interjecting my thoughts just yet.
I would love to hear them, but it's your call.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 248, sthar8 wrote:OK fox, let's do this. Have you exploded yet?In post 162, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Your last line admits that you don't really have a scum read on Nero, and you are waiting to see if he drops one.
I don't think you and I are reading the same thread. I don't see anything in that post that implies this, no matter how you twist it.
Look here-@nero- i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious.
yes
"I voted you for reactions"
No. I never said or implied that.
Look here-@nero- i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious.
Sure, but you're implying a contradiction that doesn't exist. I had to point out that I hadn't given any reasons still because"Wait I still haven't given any reasons!"youwere having trouble following the conversation.
read better. the word of the day is context. c-o-n-t-e-x-t. context.Actually, if your post 154 wasn't providing reasons what was the point of it ? I literally cant see anything other than vague reasons for a serious vote.
I asked nero why i would refuse to explain as scum, he answered. Then he asked why I might refuse to explain as town, and I answered with five reasons Imightdo so. Not, you will notice, reasons to vote him in the first place. Not, obviously, the actual reasons I was withholding reasoning.
wtf is this. It sounds so odd. "Here is why I might have voted you" Sounds like a scum throwing darts trying to get something to stick.
You say you wont tell scum why you voted.
I didn't, actually. Please fact check yourself before you spout fiction.
You are right about this. I misread your ambiguous post 149
You need to understand that making petty demands based on your own failed understanding is goofy as shit. Following that with wildly inaccurate speculation that compounds your own errors is downright annoying. And when you start being annoying, pretty much everything else gets prioritized over you.[/spoiler]
I dont see how I have been demanding? You had enough time to come back and post how stupid my questioning is but you never answered. I bet I would be annoying to a scum. Are you saying you did have time to answer the question, but it was annoying? How is asking you to explain your odd posting annoying/demanding? Also alot of your arguement against me has been strawman. I just dont see town doing this so much.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
@Aneninen-
GrayFox, 239–245 – did you really think that Sthar8 will post sooner or faster if you urge him? 16 minutes passed between the two posts I liked. Why the hell did you suppose that he had been online at all?
I was being cheeky. Because sthar said-
Yes, including the candyland nursery-school handholding for fox. Assuming he doesn't just explode from not getting his way RIGHT NOW DAMMIT.
I wasn't rushing him at all so where is he getting this? More of him trying to throw shade on my character to take away from my arguements.
I decided some verbal Judo was the best way of handling that specific quote, instead of arguing about something that didn't matter anyway. Him trying to frame me in that light just makes me think he is scum even more.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 286, davesaz wrote:@GrayFoxxx
That posting style of imbedded replies makes it difficult for others to use the post. Not trying to bang on you, just making a public service type post, FWIW.
p-edit
Damn, I know it didn't take long to type one sentence. But activity is good.
Sorry, I like to do it when I am answering multiple points. Ill try not to do it so much but I cant make promises.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 252, MTD wrote:In post 249, Aneninen wrote:
MTD, 207 – did that mean that you were townreading Sthar8? Or did that mean that you were understanding Sthar8's gameplay?
It means His post wasn't that hard to understand. Nothing more.
Also I hate your reasons for your scumleans on massive and stavgorin (or whatever the name is).
He gives reasons for voting. Says they arent reasons. Yea that goes over my head a little.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
wgeurts wrote:Hmmm... Monkey man is playing differently this game a quick search of his posts shows. Though DeathState seemingly not caring and changing his vote to MonkeyMan when seemingly under fire is odd. No ones going for a no lynch so I'll go with VOTE: DeathStare.
I honestly can't see how the Sthar vote is logical though, sam for Aneninen vote. Could you clarify those votes possibly?
Also we shouldn't let stavrogin slip our view, he's been online plenty of times to post but only posted some "bed, post latet" stuff.
Very unnecessary ambiguity. Strawman arguements. Im still scumhunting outside of him, but he is my best vote right now.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 296, sthar8 wrote:
I did. It may surprise you, but I actually wrote that post as well. None of those words mean that I have no read on nero. I mean, I even tried reading every third word. It's just not there. (
No read on nero? Where is that coming from?
Yes, that is a post I made. No, I never said or implied that I voted Nero for reactions.
You literally said you are wagoning for reactions.
It's called a "conversation." Also a correction that I don't expect you to understand the nuance of: it was "here are some reasons I might not want you to know why I voted you" not "here are some reasons I might have voted you."
How does what you said there mean "i'm wagoning for your reactions, i wanna see who cares about a wagon on you, i'm looking for opportunistic vote-hoppers, i'm waiting to expound until you've dug yourself a sufficient hole, or i think my reasoning should be obvious."
More strawman, and backtracking.
Vocabulary assignment- define and use in a sentence the following words:
Hypothetical
Potential
Strawman
Cause
Ambiguous
No.
You are right about this. I misread your ambiguous post 149
What about that post is ambiguous?
You tell me a real answer to the question and I wont call it ambiguous.
I dont see how I have been demanding?
"Hey talk to me now even though i clearly misread your last post!"In post 156, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 149, sthar8 wrote:I don't care if you think I'm town.
But as an intellectual exercise: why would I refuse to explain my reasoning as scum?
I'm not scum explain it to me.
"sthar's ignoring me so he must be scum. Answer my questions, even though I obviously have no idea what we're talking about!"In post 180, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Actually, if your post 154 wasn't providing reasons what was the point of it ? I literally cant see anything other than vague reasons for a serious vote.
You say you wont tell scum why you voted.
Are you calling me scum by not giving your "real" reasons?
"IF YOU WERE TOWN you'd drop whatever you're doing to make sureIn post 204, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Just explain yourself itsn't that hard if you're town.Iunderstand what you're talking about!"
"the only reasonIwouldn't be your top priority is if you're scum!"
You had enough time to come back and post how stupid my questioning is but you never answered.
Answered what? Your vast misinterpretation of everything I've said? Damn right! When you start writing me a paycheck that can pay my bills, you can start complaining about how I spend my time. Until then, content yourself with learning to count as well as learning to read. I came back and said "I don't have time to answer your stupid questions right now, I will do so later" and your response was "Why haven't you answered my questions yet, you must be scum."
Kindly fuck off. Also add 'job' to your vocab assignment.
No you fuck off. I could give a fuck about your real life. Paycheck? Get that shit out of here. Your a real Bitch for trying to put my posts in that light.
Back to the game.Why are you pushing that I am rushing you? What if I am? I think you are scum. Big deal. Should I put a please at the end of every post so your feelings dont get hurt, and you start calling names again?
I bet I would be annoying to a scum.
You know, I bet you wouldn't. If I were scum I could take solace in the fact that your poor reading comprehension means I could do all sorts of manipulative shit without you catching on. But I'm town, and this just means that in addition to catching scum I have to listen to you whine about how you might literally die from attention starvation. But then again, if I were scum it would be a priority to crack whatever language it is you're speaking and that seems like it might be frustrating. So you might be right.
Looks like everytime I question you it was "for attention". How convenient.
I'm saying that I had neither the time nor the inclination to deal with your massive misreading problem. And yes, repeated requests to respond to your wild theories based on a functional misunderstanding of the words I use is pretty damn annoying.
Again, how is explaining what you said your self so hard and time consuming? Like I said you had time to lay plenty of strawman.
Please stop using that term if you're not going to do so correctly.
But I am.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 369, Heartless wrote:ewwwwwwwwwwww
i'm reading grayfoxx's iso and it's like
bathing
in
tub
full of
diarreah
Thanks-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
One quick response to MTD. Did you even read 297? I wasn't reading wguerts, I was answering something he brought up regarding my vote. It's so obvious it's almost scummy that you scum read me on it. It's also so obvious I don't think I scum would try to flat out deceive the town like that.
I wasn't the only person to get caught up on wguerts no Lynch post. He explained his self and I left it alone.
The post explains your other point about my early game read on sthar as well. Why is it so hard to see me pushing sthar?
You are right that I have tunneled him, so I'm going to reread everything and try and get other reads.
It isn't scummy for me to hard push sthar if I think he might be scum. My willingness to prove my point isn't a good enough reason for you to vote me.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 402, Heartless wrote:In post 392, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Sorry for bad formatting and sentence structure still on phone. My third paragraph is reffering to post 297.
In post 395, Stavrogin wrote:Mod, I need to go on V/LA until Tuesday, life's a bit ridiculous at the moment.
(Haven't done this before, hope this is the right way to do it.)
Sorry everyone, everything's hectic at the moment. Will read and actually participate when I'm back.
well i don't know about anyone else but
IJUSTCAN'T FUCKING WAIT
for the cascade of catchups from some people
Why did you quote me?-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 404, MTD wrote:urgh.
@MOD: V/LA tomorrow through Wednesday.
I'll try to get something more done tonight, tho.
Please reply to me if you can before your absence.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 393, wgeurts wrote:Grayfoxx your trying so hard to look town it's almost scummy.
How do I reply to this? Should I act scummy so people don't think I'm scummy?
Makes no sense-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 413, Death Stare wrote:Ew I hate quote strips but I did it anyway bc I couldn't find a better way to post.
It's the only way.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 487, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 308, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Going to leave my vote where it is for now. Going to look at a few other players as I have tunneled Sthar enough for now.
i'm confused
I'm comfortable with my vote on him, but I need to stop tunneling him and see if I can find a stronger scum read.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
In post 527, Heartless wrote:In post 405, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 402, Heartless wrote:In post 392, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Sorry for bad formatting and sentence structure still on phone. My third paragraph is reffering to post 297.
well i don't know about anyone else but
IJUSTCAN'T FUCKING WAIT
for the cascade of catchups from some people
Why did you quote me?
because you have an outstanding catchup
LET'S HEAR IT
HEAR WHAT SPECIFICALLY? I DON'T MIND ANSWERING BUT THIS IS VAGUE.-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
-
-
GrayFoxxxx Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: July 28, 2014
- Location: Shadow Moses.
50 shades seems the most scummy right now. In risk of sounding OMGUS take a look at 50s original reads on me then look at the current reads on me. Has also pretty much tunnelled mtd all game after disagreeing with an early read MTD made. Also going after inactives to seem like he is still looking for more scum. I think he is picking low hanging fruit that anyone could grab.
MTD is just actively scum hunting in my eyes. The nature of his hunting is coming from a towny perspective.
Still on phone I'm going to give my strongest town read soon.
unvote
vote 50 shades
-another shitty phone post
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.