In post 1033, Thor665 wrote:In post 1029, Muffin wrote:In post 1022, Thor665 wrote:Muffin - Not fond of hard Thor defense. Call it mildly mild on the scum side.
Don't misconstrue things please.
Attacking a really weak case on someone does not equate to "hard defending" that player.
You can consider yourself an ally of convenience if you like.
Nah. I'll agree Goodmorning's play is weaksauce, but you're attacking her logic here. There is nothing inherently scummy in having gut reads - town do it all the time, and you have not shown that Goodmorning wouldn't or doesn't do that.
You're thumping on her really aggressively for what is play that is easily either suck town or kinda weak scum, and it's your big push.
Now, maybe you're trying to read her, and that's your deal, but it does come off as weirdly defensive towards me, which makes me feel the potential of buddying and I think that leaves you deserving of a call out.
Heck, take me out of the equation and 'oddly aggressive attack on gut read' becomes your play and that's worth a narrowed set of eyes all by itself.
I do not disagree that Goodmorning is being bad - she assuredly is, and she's even playing it up like she has a plan (and well she might, but I bet it's pretty weaksauce once we see it and won't justify the lackluster play). That said - the level of your attack on it is not in proper relation to the level of her crime. So it's weird, and I find you scummy for it.
Explain this. He was pushing gm for a real reason for the scumread on you, remarking he didn't find gut/tone strong enough 35 pages in. That's not discrediting, nor is it buddying you. Explain how it is buddying.
This reeks of bullshit.
In post 1059, T S O wrote:If you want a way to alleviate my boredom, how about a nice QUICKWAGON on Aneninen!
I don't think he's scum tbh. He looks like a newb being genuinely annoyed. His reads and remarks are weird as fuck but not really scummy. looks like a designated mislynch.
In post 1063, Nero Cain wrote:I'm asking you a very simple question Thor. I see no reason why you are acting out.
hey I agree
In post 1069, Egg wrote:In post 739, davesaz wrote:Scum will have knowledge of all neighborhoods they have a member in. Town does not have general neighborhood knowledge, unless we reveal the neighborhoods before any of us are eliminated. The only knowledge that scum* gain from reveals is any neighborhoods they don't have members in. It doesn't seem to help scum.
Things which reduce the gap between what scum know and what town know is good for town.
(*) Scum and other factions <if any>
^this kind of looks like being too careful not to slip knowledge of how many factions there are.
agreed.
In post 1072, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1064, Thor665 wrote:And I told you I was buddying you - so you should react to that or not.
vote:Thor