In post 439, TellTaleHeart wrote:You two have a history (which allows you to read each other well)?
Yes, and notably she's one of the players I'm most accurate at reading.
In post 439, TellTaleHeart wrote:You two have a history (which allows you to read each other well)?
In post 446, Malakittens wrote:Wisdom explain why I should be townreading you?
In post 446, Malakittens wrote:Anyways townreads in no order {Mathdino, Finnlaw, TTH, BWMS} leaning town {N_M & Wge}
In post 439, TellTaleHeart wrote:
I'm reading post 360 by acryon and I'm very confused. For one, the last post he links (247) is not to a Silver Wolf post at all, it's to a Newbie post. Overall, this seems to be an echo of Mathdino's case, which is that Silver Wolf is a sheep (ironic, a Wolf in a sheep's clothes, I know).
In post 446, Malakittens wrote:Wge would have to be really ballsy scum and be confident that his partners are good at playing scum to intentionally mason fish in thread.
In post 446, Malakittens wrote:Wge would have to be really ballsy scum and be confident that his partners are good at playing scum to intentionally mason fish in thread.
Wisdom and wge will not be scum together. I could see Silver scum.
Is it really bad that I keep confusing TTH & BWMS' posts as one player.
Anyways townreads in no order {Mathdino, Finnlaw, TTH, BWMS} leaning town {N_M & Wge}
Wisdom explain why I should be townreading you?
In post 450, Wisdom wrote:In post 439, TellTaleHeart wrote:You two have a history (which allows you to read each other well)?
Yes, and notably she's one of the players I'm most accurate at reading.
In post 456, TellTaleHeart wrote:I don't care for a few things this post. The mason fishing argument is bunk and Malakittens has wgeurts as a townread anyway so I'm not sure where these hypothetical associative tells come into play or why it's worth mentioning. Also, I've notice that multiple people (not just Malakittens) say the phrase "I could see X as scum." This is a completely meaningless buzz-phrase, in my opinion. If I thought long enough I could imagineanyonebeing scum but that doesn't make the line of thought any more valid or worth pursuing.
In post 456, TellTaleHeart wrote:(As an aside, you're probably confusing me and blind because we both have black and white avatars. I'll try to find a color one when I have time.)
In post 457, acryon wrote:In post 456, TellTaleHeart wrote:(As an aside, you're probably confusing me and blind because we both have black and white avatars. I'll try to find a color one when I have time.)
Done.
In post 463, TellTaleHeart wrote:You made it too high, acryon. It doesn't fit.
In post 469, Wisdom wrote:hai
All of them?
Ok, I'll make a detailed post on them later. You're null/scum and I'm going to have to reanalyse your posts.
In post 466, Newbie wrote:Hey. Checking in. I'll read back on what I missed later after I'm finished studying.
In post 471, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:
All of them?
Ok, I'll make a detailed post on them later. You're null/scum and I'm going to have to reanalyse your posts.
Speak English, there is no such word as "ok". Okay I say, kay? You are Oncorporeal. There was nothing stopping you from posting in the last hour.
Enlighten us dutchman?
In post 472, acryon wrote:
Who are you talking to, because how do you know whether there was something stopping them from posting? That's fine if you want to post in this ridiculous way, as long as you make your content and direction clear.
In post 473, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:In post 472, acryon wrote:
Who are you talking to, because how do you know whether there was something stopping them from posting? That's fine if you want to post in this ridiculous way, as long as you make your content and direction clear.
Child, you test my patience and sanity. With my patience goes my stability. With my sanity goes my judgement.
Do you think me a madman? Lord sojourn our victory, for this man be an utter fool! A fool's fool!
Grace us with the highlights of the game fool.