In post 630, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:^Sing us another jingle king of jesters.
You really are asking to be PL'd
, you know that, right?
Contradictions aren't an allignment tell.
I've said it before and will say it again.
In post 492, St Constantine the Hermit wrote: In post 489, wgeurts wrote:
I'm all up for PLing this guy though, he will be a nightmare to read and is therefore dangerous.
Thy Second Commandment in the Ten Commandments of Constantine's Apocrypha
-
That which is policy lynch, is scummy lynch
Hypocrisy and unfair discrediting. Also, I put this quote first because I want you to really remember what Constantine said in the underline.
In post 510, St Constantine the Hermit wrote: The lord has one requisite for this game,
DO NOT MENTION MASONS
I didn't even bold this one.
This is one of the rare game set-up's where
town has a huge advantage over a 2-3 man scum team
. Don't waste it.
In post 623, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:TTH, just to save you some breath,
the freemason alliance is pretty clear if it wasn't already
. Just stop talking about it.
Screw Freemasons, they're a shitty and absolutely worthless role
, but it is pretty much the only one town has.
In post 719, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:While the idea is obviously out of place, I do understand where he's coming from.
Masons aren't a very powerful role
, unless they are trying to confirm each other.
The whole act of confirming is only necessary when a mason is being targeted for lynching.
It's also not unlikely Wguert's is a mason by using "mason psychology" so many times.
Contradictions. See my post 225, which there still has not been a response to.
That isn't a scum tell. The only time a contradiction is scummy, is when something is said contrary to an action undertaken.
This is a fun part.
1. Constantine tells everyone the town has a huge advantage due to the masons, and then complains about how useless and shitty the mason role is.
2. Constantine commands everyone to stop talking about masons, then proceeds to outright analyse wgeurts for masonness and told Mala later on (I don't feel like finding the post) that the mason alliance is incredibly obvious. Of course, he gets a free pass because by this point, he's switched to thinking masons are useless, so who cares if they're outed, right?
In post 580, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Constantine and acryon, can you sincerely defend your Wisdom townread?
That isn't how mafia works, child. It is you who must prove he's scum.
The problem is that many egotistical souls think they know what scum look like, and what scum do.
Lord only knows this isn't the truth.
Mafia is a game of psychological analysis. Like any game where someone has something to veil, the only way to know someone is scum is to trust in your...
Game Theory and Social Theory
Is wisdom someone who conveys the traits of an exemplary soldier of god? No, he really doesn't, but nothing he's done has really been outside what I would expect from a human, who adhere's to basic principals in human nature.
Try to walk in wisdom's shoes. If you can imagine one possible scenario where he could of said something as a townie with nothing to hide, then you're really understanding how this game is played
.
I will submit, I haven't read wisdom's ISO
I bolded this part just to lol at it xD
, and as a patient servant of our lord, I have no trouble doing that. I just haven't found anything strikingly odd from what I have read.
In post 720, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Here are
actual scum tells
- Saying what "Scum" would do a lot
- When tunneled, responding back with questions and not statements
- Voting one way but reading another
- Compensating with Large Blocks of Text (This is called domination)
- Lurking
Okay, so Constantine starts off okayish, by saying a lot of arrogant people think that they know 'what scum do' (scumtells), and that you have to put yourself in the mind of the person you're analysing (in other words, look for motivations) in order to read them. Then, as shown above these quotes and in the last one, he proceeds to give authoritative judgments on what's a scumtell and what's not.
What?
The funny thing, is almost every scumtell he's said is wrong, but he appears to be tailoring what he calls a scumtell to both his scumspects and himself. Consider: he points out that contradictions aren't a scumtell right before he contradicts himself. His scumtell of 'domination' (which is really just activity) applies to me, as does responding back to Constantine's tunneling of me with questions and not statements (this also applies to Victor). What Constantine is doing is trying to be town leader (he literally said authority figures are how you catch scum) and pulling his apparent experience to set up mislynches and give himself a free pass.
In post 514, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:^Seriously,
none of this dodging the question bullshit? Everyone needs to confess their reads to the lord. Everyone.
Jesus and I are only interested in the read of the person you want to lynch.
I don't really think I need to explain this. He tries and fails to strongarm reads out of people at which point he absolutely refuses to give any reads of his own.
In post 565, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:I usually don't explain my reads or thoughts until many questions have been asked
. Most people on this site suck at playing mafia, or
let their ego's drive their decision making
Again, bolded just for lulz
.
Everyone's so sure that they know who scum is, that no one's willing to cooperate.
I would like to cooperate, and I would like to win this game. Please help me do that.
If you want my statement, you're going to need to give it some time. Lord know's we have plenty of it. I always like seeing what others think of my vote
before
I tell them why I chose it. It really defeats the purpose to feed reasoning scum can easily refute. Encouraging people to think for themselves goes a mile longer than me telling them why to follow my lead.
With that said,
why do you think I might be scum reading him
?
Didn't bold this.
God grace's to you, and hopefully you understand my position better.
And this quote is all kinds of scummy; he replaces into a game, votes someone, refuses to give reads, and asks everyone else to form his case for him when he's clearly read the least or near the least out of all players. Also, he complains about everyone thinking they know who scum is when he's been tunneling the same 3 players all game.
In post 576, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:I really want to smite you, so hell yeah I'm going to tunnel.
Tunneling a scum read is actually a
good
thing to do.
Please take a leap of faith with me here guy's. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about
VOTE: Mathdino
Ha. Ha ha ha. Complains about everyone tunneling while he tunnels one of the most active players in the game for
no. Goddamn. Reason.
Not ONCE did he explain why he thinks I'm scum past possible association with Victor, and he flat out admits that he just wants me out of the game. Gee, I wonder why.
And then he says that tunneling a scumread is a good thing after calling multiple people out on it in his ISO. I don't have the time nor the effort to go through it to point it out, but take a look if you're so inclined, TTH. I recall him pointing out people tunneling Wisdom and wgeurts multiple times.
In post 831, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:^This is the same reason wisdom just scum read riddleton.
Still think you, victor, and silverwolve's replacement are scum.
That hasn't changed at all since I started this joke of a game.
In post 657, St Constantine the Hermit wrote: In post 655, Mathdino wrote: In post 651, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:@Mala -
If it wasn't shockingly obvious who the freemason's are already
Bolded because this is the mason stuff I was talking about earlier.
.
Holy hell would you stop with this?
Secondly, I've been scumhunting the entire game. How is continuing to do exactly what I'm doing going to change your mind? Your entire case is based on association.
Actually my case on you and Victor is based off of intent, not association
. My read on silver was association, that I'll concede.
If I'm scum reading you and victor, and you're actually contributing on a regular basis, by policy I would prefer to lynch victor.
I'm just bewildered that he's been given a free pass on this for so long. I can't prove a negative with this case, but look through his ISO and show me ONE (1) reason he's had for voting me that doesn't have to do with association. Constantine has consistently dodged questions on his baseless tunneling, while complaining about the town to put himself on a pedestal. At this point I honestly think he replaced into the game, read the thread, and decided to try to lynch who he thought was the towniest person in order to get a reaction of some kind.
I want to see this coming from a town perspective. I really do. But the fact that he's provided ZERO (0) reasoning for the majority of his claims even when asked makes them look like they came out of thin air. This isn't something arrogant town does, TTH. Arrogant town at least explains their reads and proceeds to shit on everyone for not seeing things the same way they do. Constantine just dodged questions long enough for people to accept that his reads came from somewhere.