In post 1548, borkjerfkin wrote:Considering you were willing to lynch him to save vic? Lol
Who? Because wguerts wasn't an option at that time. I wanted to lynch Constantine/Riddle over Vic, not wguerts.
In post 1548, borkjerfkin wrote:Considering you were willing to lynch him to save vic? Lol
In post 1547, Wisdom wrote:
Well I found it likely. I wasn't feeling good about Mala so it was time to start scrutinizing her anyway. But no, it has to be scum motivated
In post 1544, Wisdom wrote:In post 1538, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1531, Wisdom wrote:Yes, I saw this. Especially given this happened in twilight; why can't this be a VT drawing the NK? Why can't it be scum faking said vt (or faking a mason)?
Yeah that + the hard defending that mala & N_M have been doing to each other really points at this fake scenario
Just why would masons be so obvious?
Mala is not dumb nor newbie, if she's town it makes total sense for her to try and mislead scum with such a twilight comment.
People hard defending their townreads is nothing new.Constantinewas saying I am 100% town earlier. Are we masons too?
Translation: Victor is scum for tunneling. Your case sucks.
In post 752, Wisdom wrote:In post 749, Riddleton wrote:
Please read this for more information. Victor made a baseless vote against Wgeurts, he invented new reasoning to support his fallacious claim as he goes along, as he doesn't want to believe the wagon he's trying to push is incorrect.
Translation: Victor is scum for tunneling.
Because town never tunnel, huh?
Your case sucks.
In post 1551, Mathdino wrote:Yet you're basically unwilling to even consider the possibility that she's not town. I asked you who you'd want to lynch if Mala flips town for a reason, Wisdom (no it's not because I thought Mala was a mason, it's because this is stuff I can use later). You were unwilling to even consider that possibility. All of your D2 actions have hinged on Mala being the wagon.
In post 1551, Mathdino wrote:And honestly, Wisdom, the fact that she's the only one displaying that mason behaviour along with her buddy IN THIS GAME is kind of damning. The rest of us have either been attack dogs on everyone, or have explicitly or implicitly claimed VT.
In post 1559, Wisdom wrote:Consider the possibility Mala has been trying to fool scum while the real masons are people you think might be scum or even VTs. You're just going for the mostlikelyanswer.
In post 1551, Mathdino wrote:Edit: Wisdom. No one else in this game has been doing that. Except Constantine actually but he's obviously not a mason.
In post 1560, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1559, Wisdom wrote:Consider the possibility Mala has been trying to fool scum while the real masons are people you think might be scum or even VTs. You're just going for the mostlikelyanswer.
fixed
In post 1554, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1544, Wisdom wrote:In post 1538, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1531, Wisdom wrote:Yes, I saw this. Especially given this happened in twilight; why can't this be a VT drawing the NK? Why can't it be scum faking said vt (or faking a mason)?
Yeah that + the hard defending that mala & N_M have been doing to each other really points at this fake scenario
Just why would masons be so obvious?
Mala is not dumb nor newbie, if she's town it makes total sense for her to try and mislead scum with such a twilight comment.
People hard defending their townreads is nothing new.Constantinewas saying I am 100% town earlier. Are we masons too?
better?
In post 1564, Wisdom wrote:My point wasn't whether we're masons.
In post 1553, Mathdino wrote:She's hard defended her townreads, sure, but does she typically pick a townread from like page 3 and defend them for the rest of the game?
Doesanyone?
Or is it more likely that she'd be like "Hey, so I don't like this post, although I still think he's town"?
In post 1566, Wisdom wrote:She actually did this, she questioned N_M's buddying on her as she called it. Check again.
In post 1555, Mathdino wrote:When it comes to the Victor stuff, well, read this page. I find it hilarious that of the 2 people trying to stop the Victor wagon, one ran a counter case and logicked it out, while the other dismissed it through misrepping:
Translation: Victor is scum for tunneling. Your case sucks.
In post 1567, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1566, Wisdom wrote:She actually did this, she questioned N_M's buddying on her as she called it. Check again.
Obviously irrelevant considering you were willing to eliminate them as a team in 1287 because of all the cross-defending, sooooooo
In post 1563, borkjerfkin wrote:So this has been one giant exercise in moving the goalposts, as we've gone from "I never even considered they might be masons at all" to "it's not proof she's definitely a mason because X other WIFOMy things exist to invalidate its definitiveness and I'm just considering them all therefore it's ok that i'm pushing them as scum independently of each other"
In post 1287, Wisdom wrote:Don't think so. They voted me together, they defend each other.. it would beridiculousif a scumteam wasso obvious.
In post 1571, Wisdom wrote:In post 1563, borkjerfkin wrote:So this has been one giant exercise in moving the goalposts, as we've gone from "I never even considered they might be masons at all" to "it's not proof she's definitely a mason because X other WIFOMy things exist to invalidate its definitiveness and I'm just considering them all therefore it's ok that i'm pushing them as scum independently of each other"
Yeah, and it has moved to this because you are somehow 100% confident you have found the masons and use that as any decision making. Meanwhile, I still didn't think about such a thing at all when I made the post, and it still doesn't make sense for scum to do what I did. Which you're still failing at responding to, so