Mini 1633 ~ Non-normal Mafias Mafia OVER!!!

Titus · Post Post #1050 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 6:33 am

Pasch and I are in thread Masons.

Eye, why are you acting entitled? 1026 is telling MTD "what he needs to do". It's not as if you're going to self vote if he does it. It reads of discrediting a case. If only he had done that, his scumread might be valid. Yet, you have been acting desperate not to be suspected all game.

Titus · Post Post #1051 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 6:35 am

In post 1046, eyestott wrote:Nope.
Gun Sensus.

Eyestott's case is shit. SK comes back as immune to investigation a lot. SK with gun flavor is not unheard of.

Randomnamechange · Post Post #1052 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 9:22 am

Eyestott is getting scummier than the post.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1053 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:51 am

I like that the thread is no longer pasch vs om but they've both pretty much dipped after the flamewar which is concerning.

eyestott · Post Post #1054 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:01 am

In post 1050, Titus wrote:Pasch and I are in thread Masons.

Eye, why are you acting entitled? 1026 is telling MTD "what he needs to do". It's not as if you're going to self vote if he does it. It reads of discrediting a case. If only he had done that, his scumread might be valid. Yet, you have been acting desperate not to be suspected all game.

No, but its not like people will consolidate if he doesnt. If a scumread on me has clear, thought out reasons that can be discussed, thats much better than a half-reasoned vote.

eyestott · Post Post #1055 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:02 am

In post 1051, Titus wrote:
In post 1046, eyestott wrote:Nope.
Gun Sensus.

Eyestott's case is shit. SK comes back as immune to investigation a lot. SK with gun flavor is not unheard of.

Why quote this post? Its correcting House about Ghostlins claim.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1056 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:56 am

In post 1053, Flubbernugget wrote:I like that the thread is no longer pasch vs om but they've both pretty much dipped after the flamewar which is concerning.

im literally just waiting for this day to fucking end

Randomnamechange · Post Post #1057 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 12:51 pm

Titus wrote:Pasch and I are in thread Masons.

Eye, why are you acting entitled? 1026 is telling MTD "what he needs to do". It's not as if you're going to self vote if he does it. It reads of discrediting a case. If only he had done that, his scumread might be valid. Yet, you have been acting desperate not to be suspected all game.

Please can you explain what inthread masons are?

House · Post Post #1058 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:13 pm

In post 1057, Randomnamechange wrote:
Titus wrote:Pasch and I are in thread Masons.

Eye, why are you acting entitled? 1026 is telling MTD "what he needs to do". It's not as if you're going to self vote if he does it. It reads of discrediting a case. If only he had done that, his scumread might be valid. Yet, you have been acting desperate not to be suspected all game.

Please can you explain what inthread masons are?

It means Titus is trying to align with Pasch by appearing to protect him.

VOTE: Titus

ika · Post Post #1059 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:15 pm

In post 1056, Om of the Nom wrote:im literally just waiting for this day to fucking end

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1060 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:16 pm

house for the love of heck there is no time for vanity wagons

House · Post Post #1061 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:19 pm

I totally agree.

CooLDoG · Post Post #1062 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:41 pm

VOTE COUNT 1.14

Om of the Nom (0) ~
tn5421 (0) ~
MTD (0) ~
ika (1) ~ , Paschendale
Ghostlin (1) ~ Flubbernugget,
randomidget (2) ~ , Mathdino, Ghostlin
Mathdino (0) ~ ,
Flubbernugget (1) ~ tn5421,
FourTrouble (0) ~
House (0) ~ ,

Paschendale (5) ~ FourTrouble, Om of the Nom, Flubbernugget, ika, eyestott, (L-2)

eyestott (3) ~ randomidget, titus, MTD,
titus (1) ~ House

It takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is: 17:00 (CST) Monday, January 19, 2015

Not Voting (0):

tn5421 · Post Post #1063 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:43 pm

Isn't titus supposed to be on autolynch day one status anyway? I seem to remember that being a big deal when we were playing in Open 569.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1064 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:46 pm

In post 1063, tn5421 wrote:Isn't titus supposed to be on autolynch day one status anyway? I seem to remember that being a big deal when we were playing in Open 569.

hey well the titus wagon was pushed the titus wagon has passed you missed your chance lets lynch her tomorrow

tn5421 · Post Post #1065 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:49 pm

Naw fuck that im dangerous lets go

VOTE: Titus

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1066 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:51 pm

VOTE: Titus
ok now its gaining traction then lets do this fucking shit

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1067 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 2:51 pm

if titus flips scum im reserving a big fat i told you so just for pasch <3

eyestott · Post Post #1068 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:01 pm

Well, everyone knows that I would definitely prefer this to Pasch, so
VOTE: Titus
I told MTD he would see, but he didnt know what I was talking about. This is what I'm talking about.

MTD · Post Post #1069 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:04 pm

Vote stays.

eyestott · Post Post #1070 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:04 pm

In post 836, MTD wrote:then switching to titus which seems like a wagon that isn't going to happen anyway

eyestott · Post Post #1071 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:05 pm

In post 1017, MTD wrote:Titus I don't like your townread on me.

eyestott · Post Post #1072 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:07 pm

I'm just trolling MTD at the moment, as we're both in a voice call XD

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1073 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:10 pm

In post 1069, MTD wrote:Vote stays.

if we no lynch im pushing your lynch hard just for this post

MTD · Post Post #1074 (ISO) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:11 pm

I will change vote if needed but rn no wagon has more than 4 votes.