Open 586: Playing With Elements~ (D7)

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:37 am

I could lynch either.

Huntress · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:39 am

Official Vote Count

dodgy56

(4): VysePresident, kelbris, MathBlade, davesaz

davesaz

(4): wgeurts, Wax, House, guille2015

BlueBloodedToffee

(3): Alchemist21, Titus, SilverWolf

wgeurts

(1): dodgy56

Flames682

(1): insanity018

Wax

(1): BlueBloodedToffee

Not Voting

(2): Shinobi, Flames682

With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline

: (expired on 2015-01-24 20:00:00)

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:40 am

Shit.

VOTE: dodgy

SilverWolf · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:48 am

dodgy56 · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:49 am

In post 1077, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Shit.

VOTE: dodgy

again why?

you have been off my lynch most of the day yet jump on as soon as it looks like i may not be lynched?

thats just a little bit suss....

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:49 am

Self-preservation.

SilverWolf · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:51 am

In post 1079, dodgy56 wrote:
In post 1077, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Shit.

VOTE: dodgy

again why?

you have been off my lynch most of the day yet jump on as soon as it looks like i may not be lynched?

thats just a little bit suss....

I will not hold it against you if you OMGUS his ass.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:52 am

SW make use of your vote.

I'm not getting lynched toDay.

SilverWolf · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:53 am

In post 1082, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:SW make use of your vote.

I'm not getting lynched toDay.

If you think I'm lynching Dodgy, you are high.

SilverWolf · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:54 am

VOTE: davesaz

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:56 am

K.

VOTE: Dave

VysePresident · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:58 am

P-Edit - @BBT - Do you have any suspicion on Dodgy at all, or is this entirely self-preservation?
P-Edit 2 - RE: Dave.

In post 1050, SilverWolf wrote:First, I could not justify staying on that Dodgy wagon when his latest posts are so townie.

In post 1066, SilverWolf wrote:

Wax, Titus, House, Kelbris,
Dodgy
, Shinobi all look town. Shinobi I'm partially reading from Grib's play also.

And that's my updated view on the gamestate right now.

How did you get here? I've read over that exchange with Dodgy a couple times now, and it's not particularly Townish to me. I'm not getting any sense of him sorting through the game, and his suspicions don't flow naturally - I think he's grasping anything that'll keep him afloat.

I'll try to elaborate when I get home from work, but I don't get this sudden reversal.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:59 am

Self-preservation.

Dave and Dodgy are both null reads to me.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:03 am

For his next trick, BBT will build a meta case!

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:04 am

Something wrong Alchemist?

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:06 am

Just your mocking the other players this game. But I appreciate your semi-subtlety.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:06 am

Who have I mocked?

SilverWolf · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:07 am

In post 1086, VysePresident wrote:

In post 1050, SilverWolf wrote:First, I could not justify staying on that Dodgy wagon when his latest posts are so townie.

In post 1066, SilverWolf wrote:

Wax, Titus, House, Kelbris,
Dodgy
, Shinobi all look town. Shinobi I'm partially reading from Grib's play also.

And that's my updated view on the gamestate right now.

How did you get here? I've read over that exchange with Dodgy a couple times now, and it's not particularly Townish to me. I'm not getting any sense of him sorting through the game, and his suspicions don't flow naturally - I think he's grasping anything that'll keep him afloat.

I'll try to elaborate when I get home from work, but I don't get this sudden reversal.

His latest posts look a lot better to me than his earlier posts. I can give you better reasons if you'd like with post links but it'll have to wait until I have a bit more time. Feel free to elaborate on dodgy scum also when you can.

dodgy56 · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:09 am

So wguerts is going nowhere today
UNVOTE:
VOTE: BBT

i prefer a BBT lynch to a dave lynch at this point. i still think its likely dave is town. BBT lately has become more suspicious. i can to some extent understand his self-preservation point though.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:10 am

In post 1091, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Who have I mocked?

Wax and Dodgy.

First you vote them for a read reversal (the same reason they voted Dave) and now you keep saying your votes are for self preservation in obvious reference to Dodgy's posts.

You're mocking others by repeating their bad actions, and since you hate meta I just assumed your next trick will be a fake meta case.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:10 am

You have to Dodgy. Would be awfully suspect if you didn't.

I didn't realise you were pushing Wgeurts with me.

Also, why am I scum again?

dodgy56 · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:12 am

also we actually need someone to reach 9 votes today. otherwise we get a no lynch and thats not going to help us at all.

SilverWolf · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:13 am

In post 1096, dodgy56 wrote:also we actually need someone to reach 9 votes today. otherwise we get a no lynch and thats not going to help us at all.

I won't let that happen. I'll switch if I have to so we can avoid that.

VysePresident · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:14 am

Making this quick because I'm headed for work in a couple minutes.

At this point, out of our serious wagons, I'll lynch Dodgy with pleasure, and sheep a BBT or Dave lynch with reluctance. I want to gauge the latter two more - BBT is just hard for me to read, and Dave is mislynch bait for the exact reasons he was in this game. It doesn't clear him (I noted my suspicions somewhere.) but he's not my first choice at the moment.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:15 am

In post 1094, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1091, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Who have I mocked?

Wax and Dodgy.

First you vote them for a read reversal (the same reason they voted Dave) and now you keep saying your votes are for self preservation in obvious reference to Dodgy's posts.

You're mocking others by repeating their bad actions, and since you hate meta I just assumed your next trick will be a fake meta case.

I'm not mocking them.

My reason for voting Wax was legit.

And my votes on Dodgy/Dave are legit self-preservation.

I see no mocking.

PEdit - Vyse, I'm town. There ya go, problem solved.