I'm going to skim. Deal with it.
In post 128, beastcharizard wrote:VOTE: Chettory
Anxiety is also scum.
I don't like any of their posts. Chettah tried ATE already which is horrible: "Woa is me, no one is paying attention to me." Like come on really?
Yea, I sort of agree with this. Cheetory's posts seemed a bit overfabricated for my taste, and seem a bit out of place.
no
In post 165, theamatuer wrote: In post 157, farside22 wrote: In post 118, theamatuer wrote:
hi
Also
Vote: The Critic
always try to lynch the mod in a bastard game.
Since the first 100 posts has contained nothing except random vote throwing, I'm just gonna wait till theres acutal content.
Though 4nx is probably scum just because he voted 4th
See, this is shit. You're going to wait until there's actual content? Guess what, there's a shit ton of content. What this translates to is "I'm going to justify lurking some more and watch you people lynch a random person"
Basically, anybody whose only posts are "Wow this is long how ever will I catch up" should die. Stop telling us how much trouble you're having keeping track, and post something useful.
Also, anyone whose going around saying it doesn't matter who we lynch. Yea, it does. Don't lynch someone just because it gets us to night faster.
In post 209, Cheetory6 wrote:Because it bugs me to not respond to things people ask me and I don't want to leave people hanging on answers to things especially when it's so easy in this case.
I don't mind answering questions about things I've done, but I have no interest in trying to sort the intentions of people in the game right now.
Why not?
In post 218, Gilgamesh King Of Heroes wrote:Greetings, mongrels. And as I said previously, hello again to mollie, farside and Peregrine. I hope this game shall be as enjoyable as the last.
The claim from Heartless in
13 seems town.
In post 28, PeregrineV wrote:Vote: Gilgamesh, King of Heroes
He suffered an untimley death last game.
So you think I should suffer a timely death this game? Cur!
Vote: PeregrineV
mastin's posting annoys me, and while I disagree with mollie on Heartless being scum, I like her vote on mastin (
45).
The mollie wagon seems aggressive, and I actually do not think she is scum despite her tunneling on Antihero.
I can see theamateur being scum for his voting-the-mod post. In the same fake-sounding vein, beastcharizard's
128 doesn't feel right to me. Neither does Psyche's claim with a lack of vote (
147).
Cheetory is town, Reina's post
193 is a nulltell.
Unvote
Vote: theamateur
This wild dog needs to be put out of his misery. Your king demands it.
This post is a town one. It also made me happy.
Also, for the record, I think the Heartless claim is a real one.
In post 220, Heartless wrote:
In post 20, Aeronaut wrote:Fisticuffs is my favorite word.
You're now leaning town because you said it
Pulling back the joking "read" to include the word "lean" is an unnecessary modifier that doesn't
really
belong here.
I mean, I feel like saying my favorite word isn't enough to conftown him... yet.
In post 113, Aeronaut wrote:
Then why even talk about his frequency at rolling scum in the past if it's not indicitave of anything?
This was the most alarming one for me. He's interjecting himself into mollie and Brian's conversation about Brian's comments about Anti and the claim. The comment here doesn't fit into the flow of the conversation and is a bit of a strawman because Brian wasn't saying that previous games were indicative of anything. His mention of what Anti's rolled in the past seemed to be more for the purpose of providing background. Aeronaut taking a shot at that one part of what Brian posted without giving an opinion on the overall situation regarding the claim is really out of place and awkward considering the context.
I don't agree. What I tend to look for the most earlygame is posts which are trying too hard to be content. Brian added that whole last paragraph about how Anti never getting town in his games, yada yada, and then just sort of says "but that doesn't really matter" at the end. Why even post it then, unless he was just trying to make the post look more analytical than it was?
In post 123, Aeronaut wrote: In post 118, theamatuer wrote:
hi
Also
Vote: The Critic
always try to lynch the mod in a bastard game.
Since the first 100 posts has contained nothing except random vote throwing, I'm just gonna wait till theres acutal content.
Though 4nx is probably scum just because he voted 4th
VOTE: theamatuer
This post wreaks of fake
Ironically, I think Aeronaut's post "reeks of fake" a lot more than amateur's. "Reeks of fake" doesn't
quite
fit and doesn't really work as an assessment of theamateur's post. As such, it feels forced and overstated and more likely to come from scum trying to sound assertive or authoritative. What I'm figuring is the problem of people voting theamateur is the vote for the moderator and the dismissal of activity up to that point. Personally, I think it's a relatively cosmetic issue and it doesn't bother me.
Well, you seem to be extremely concerned with cosmetic issues, actually. If you don't read that post as being fake as fuck, I don't know which post you're reading. He voted for the mod, makes a dryish theory joke, justifies himself not having and continuing to not read the thread, then throws in "4nx is probably scum" for no good reason, other then to look cute. If he actually thought that, then why vote for the mod over a scumread? If he was joking, that's an awkward-ass place for a joke intro post. All that post is is trying way to hard to fit into the conversation, and to look endearing.
Brian can defend me all he wants. He's goin places, I tell ya