In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Boonskiies.
There is 3 of us though and I'm not giving you the last one.
I would like to get Zeb to L-1 and force a claim. Do you object to this? If so, why?
maybe, alternatively, you should die
In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Boonskiies.
There is 3 of us though and I'm not giving you the last one.
I would like to get Zeb to L-1 and force a claim. Do you object to this? If so, why?
In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Boonskiies.
There is 3 of us though and I'm not giving you the last one.
I would like to get Zeb to L-1 and force a claim. Do you object to this? If so, why?
In post 52, ploben wrote:In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Boonskiies.
There is 3 of us though and I'm not giving you the last one.
I would like to get Zeb to L-1 and force a claim. Do you object to this? If so, why?
Sure. You start the vote.
In post 54, pisskop wrote:I'm from Bristol. That used to be something to brag about
In post 52, ploben wrote:In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Boonskiies.
There is 3 of us though and I'm not giving you the last one.
I would like to get Zeb to L-1 and force a claim. Do you object to this? If so, why?
Sure. You start the vote.
In post 49, tip wrote:In post 23, Luca Blight wrote:VOTE: Zebulin
I don't see why it is necessary for you to try and colour my view of another player this early into the game.
that fact that he's promulgating boonskiies' apparently general shitty play at this early a stage in the game is pretty townie actually as it suggests anti-townie play from aforesaid user may not be owing to the fact that they're mafia. there's no reason for a mafioso to provide preemptive excuses for other players early on in the game, especially one that can be easily pushed, unless they're partners which is also unlikely.
In post 60, Slandaar wrote:If you clowns really think it's a good idea to get someone to claim for no reason then lets just massclaim D1.
Blue starts.
In post 63, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Hammering this early is really a bad idea.
In post 60, Slandaar wrote:If you clowns really think it's a good idea to get someone to claim for no reason then lets just massclaim D1.
Blue starts.
In post 31, Ponystar17 wrote:VOTE: Zebulin
I don't like the fact that he's trying to bring up someone else's meta this early in the game. Possible reasons why:
a) He actually, genuinely wants to warn us that he thinks Boonskiies is completely insane as VT, and the town is better off if he's lynched, regardless of alignment. Possible but seems unlikely when Boonskiies hasn't done anything to warrant the meta-warning yet.
b) Zebulin is scum and wishes to encourage a lynch of Boonskiies, who he knows is town.
c) They're both scum and he was trying to provide an excuse for any later mistakes by Boon.
d) I'm overanalyzing random chatter from this stage of the game.
All of these are possible. Personally, I suspect Zebulin because he seems outright manipulative already - he's trying to affect how we look at Boonskiies when we've barely even started.
Also, a point to do with your post that confused me, Zeb: wouldn't tunneling him because you think he's anti-town produce the same negative result as it did in that previous game, since a town-flip by him would inevitably implicate you? If you're both town again, that's two mislynches.
In post 40, Boonskiies wrote:Right!! Let's blame Kilerjester!
And if anyone has any reason to find me untrusting or suspicious, it's BlueBloodedToffee.
Also, my hammer that game with Zebulin on day 1 did hit scum...I may be ridiculous, but village idiot isn't the right word. Most people find that out around day 3.
BlueBloodedToffee wrote:He stated intent.
I wouldn't put it past Boon to just hammer, but I don't think he will.