With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
Day 2 ends in (expired on 2015-03-01 01:15:23).[/area]
In post 751, Sup-Zero wrote:I don't understand why slimer is L-1 aside from lurking.
In post 693, Green Crayons wrote:2. Her posting frequently/format resembles that of scum. She'll go inactive, come back with a massive quote/respond post, have a smattering of smaller posts, and then go inactive again for a few days. The inactive - sudden activity flurry - then inactive again allows her to not be in the center of thread consciousness. Her massive quote/respond posts make her look active, but most folks will probably only skim, and therefore she evades real scrutiny.
I'm not saying her V/LA is fabricated. I'm saying that going absent and then coming back with a serious of catch up posts -- and this is her habitual play this game, not a one-time event -- is aligned with scum play.
Oldie Mafia 2. The scum that was constantly doing catch up posts was porochaz. He had a legitimate excuse for his V/LA (funeral and other bad IRL experiences), but he kept doing posts like these: Post 444, Post 596, Post 676.
Also, I just got finished with a game where this happened again. Mini 1609. The scum that was constantly doing catch up posts was massive. Once again, a legitimate reason (no weeked access), but he kept doing posts like these: Post 2434, 2497, and Post 3336.
Once again, it's not so much that someone has V/LA, and then decides to make catch up posts. It's the heavy emphasis of using catch up posts, as it allows a person to look like they are providing the town with a lot of activity, but it isn't really all that substantive and useful for the town.
Of course, being V/LA was the predicate for farside relying heavily on her catch up posts, but it's the catch up posts and not her V/LA that is the suspicious part of her play for purposes of that line of suspicion. And as I pointed out when Riddle wanted me to do the work for farside, farside could have jumped in and made a (what would have been a pretty convincing) meta defense: that she has been doing similar catch up posts in all of her games.
In post 743, Titus wrote:vettrock (4)-archaebob, Albert B. Rampage,Sup-Zero, Teapot
Albert B. Rampage (4)- droog, Zymf, Astinus,vettrock
Not Voting: theslimer3,TheCow,Morgan
Before reading, I'm inclined not to lynch Sup-Zero or Teapot, now GC.
In post 748, Titus wrote:#189, Texcat should be lynched before Vettrock. Given Vettrock was not the dayvig, if Slimer flips scum, Texcat is almost certainly town. He also avoids giving direct comment on the ABR and Vettock wagons here.
In post 745, Titus wrote:This is wrong. Slimer and Vettock had interactions, even if they weren't direct with each other.
In post 731, Green Crayons wrote:BBmolla. Hero. Sup. Seriously. 728.
In post 728, theslimer3 wrote:1. Can you really say that's scummy at all? I don't normally say my opinion on anything for that matter. Just because I don't say something doesn't mean I have some ulterior motive of throwing the discussion off or trying to veer off it, so this speculation just seems pointless to me.
2. The deadline was coming up and I had already stated that I wouldn't want ABR lynched (which I was right about his non-gamble btw). Why on earth would I just vote on someone new when I wanted to keep ABR alive, which I've acknowledged as probably town.
3. Well I guess I didn't look hard enough for them to not see them, and unlike you all I don't vote someone for not answering a question (or being there to answer that question for that matter). In fact I'm pretty sparce with my votes if you haven't noticed.
In post 728, theslimer3 wrote:In post 664, texcat wrote:
Also still @Slimer, did you miss my questions? I saw your answer about Sup, but didn't see anything about Tea, nka GreenCrayons.
Neut on Tea, except that DayVig. It's possible that he was the one behind that, but there's no proof for that.
I don't like GC though. He voted for Pissop for pretty much a feeling and something that seems off. He also voted me because... Well I'm inactive. And dressed it up to make it seem like it's just a scummy motive behind it. Also It's been noted before that I'm scummy because I'm inactive. Quite possibly a piggyback.
Agreed.In post 748, Titus wrote:if Slimer flips scum, Texcat is almost certainly town
I don't follow what you're saying this this paragraph. But it seems relevant that slimer stated a town read on Albert.In post 748, Titus wrote:#555 implies that ABR's shot is something to be feared and a voter changed because they did not fear ABR's shot anymore. This implies town ABR. Someone who thought ABR was scum wouldn't fear a vengeshot on day 1.
There was a votecount just a few hours before, so I don't think the delay between the request and the execution was very long. Though there are a lot of players whose online status was hidden, or who were logged in around that time, or who posted in the thread and therefore were logged in.In post 749, Titus wrote:Texcat login is a null tell. The vig shot depends just as much on mod availability as submissions.
Context matters. Teapot was not quick to jump off of vettrock. They were on vett for two days and were I think the last player off the vettrock wagon.In post 758, texcat wrote:
The problem here is that Teapot was pushing the ABR lynch, and then only momentarily switched over to Vettrock without a good explanation for the switch, and then switched back to ABR. It just looked too much like scum voting for the town cred, but switching back when it really mattered.
In post 760, BBmolla wrote:I mean, I can't vote slimer any harder
Herodotus wrote:Context matters. Teapot was not quick to jump off of vettrock. They were on vett for two days and were I think the last player off the vettrock wagon.
Why aren't you making the same accusation toward Morgan or Sup-zero?
In post 708, texcat wrote:I agree that Pisskop's voting record has a lot to be desired, but I don't think it's actually as bad as Teapot's.
True. I don't know what to think of that.In post 771, texcat wrote:But he seems more interested in lynching anyone.