Open 587 - Nightless Vengeful Mayhem [Game Over]


User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #750 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:18 am

Post by Wisdom »

Vote Count 2.7
theslimer3 (4)
-
pisskop, Green Crayons, Morgan, Titus
[L-1]

Titus (1)
-
BBMolla

Herodotus (1)
-
Sup-Zero

BBMolla (1)
-
theslimer3

Green Crayons (1)
-
texcat


Not Voting:
Herodotus


With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 2 ends in (expired on 2015-03-01 01:15:23).[/area]
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Sup-Zero
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Goon
Goon
Posts: 103
Joined: January 14, 2015

Post Post #751 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:42 am

Post by Sup-Zero »

I don't understand why slimer is L-1 aside from lurking.
User avatar
Titus
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
User avatar
User avatar
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
Moon Walker
Posts: 80307
Joined: May 3, 2013
Pronoun: She/her

Post Post #752 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:02 am

Post by Titus »

In post 751, Sup-Zero wrote:I don't understand why slimer is L-1 aside from lurking.


Read my last posts and say that again.

If you don't follow, ask a question.
Show
The scum had the misfortune of Titus being absurdly accurate on day one.Really quite impressed by that.~Drixx

You're letting Titus win the game by herself.Good luck now I guess.You have no chance to win.~Tywin

GTKTitus Part 2
Titus Academy

VLA Friday nights until Sunday morning.

All hail the Scum Empress!
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Sup-Zero
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Goon
Goon
Posts: 103
Joined: January 14, 2015

Post Post #753 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:05 am

Post by Sup-Zero »

Idk. I'll need to talk it over with Xay next time I can talk to him.

I've been kinda lazy lately so I wouldn't be surprised if I overlooked a ton of stuff.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #754 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:33 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I know I used the term "active lurking," but that's not really the idea I'm trying to get at with:

In post 693, Green Crayons wrote:2. Her posting frequently/format resembles that of scum. She'll go inactive, come back with a massive quote/respond post, have a smattering of smaller posts, and then go inactive again for a few days. The inactive - sudden activity flurry - then inactive again allows her to not be in the center of thread consciousness. Her massive quote/respond posts make her look active, but most folks will probably only skim, and therefore she evades real scrutiny.

Clarification That I Made In Another Game: (<-- the links still work if you follow that)

I'm not saying her V/LA is fabricated. I'm saying that going absent and then coming back with a serious of catch up posts -- and this is her habitual play this game, not a one-time event -- is aligned with scum play.

Oldie Mafia 2. The scum that was constantly doing catch up posts was porochaz. He had a legitimate excuse for his V/LA (funeral and other bad IRL experiences), but he kept doing posts like these: Post 444, Post 596, Post 676.

Also, I just got finished with a game where this happened again. Mini 1609. The scum that was constantly doing catch up posts was massive. Once again, a legitimate reason (no weeked access), but he kept doing posts like these: Post 2434, 2497, and Post 3336.

Once again, it's not so much that someone has V/LA, and then decides to make catch up posts. It's the heavy emphasis of using catch up posts, as it allows a person to look like they are providing the town with a lot of activity, but it isn't really all that substantive and useful for the town.

Of course, being V/LA was the predicate for farside relying heavily on her catch up posts, but it's the catch up posts and not her V/LA that is the suspicious part of her play for purposes of that line of suspicion. And as I pointed out when Riddle wanted me to do the work for farside, farside could have jumped in and made a (what would have been a pretty convincing) meta defense: that she has been doing similar catch up posts in all of her games.

For the record, farside was scum in that game, too.

It's an easy crutch to use if you're scum, and that's why I think it is more likely to come from scum than town. And while I don't think it's a sure fire tell, for me it helps solidify the good aspects of the case I've seen Hero make against slimer.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Sup-Zero
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Goon
Goon
Posts: 103
Joined: January 14, 2015

Post Post #755 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:36 am

Post by Sup-Zero »

Sure.

Just let me talk it over with Xay first since I'd rather not just do whatever while he isn't paying attention.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #756 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:37 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Well, that was partly responding to you, but also clarifying because one of slimer's big points was "oooh maybe I'm just inactive because IRL guys JEEZE."
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Sup-Zero
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sup-Zero
Goon
Goon
Posts: 103
Joined: January 14, 2015

Post Post #757 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:54 am

Post by Sup-Zero »

Excuses.


At any rate we'll have an answer either late tonight or tomorrow morning at the latest, whenever he gets on.
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #758 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:48 pm

Post by texcat »

In post 743, Titus wrote:
vettrock (4)
-
archaebob, Albert B. Rampage,
Sup-Zero, Teapot
Albert B. Rampage (4)
- droog, Zymf, Astinus,
vettrock


Not Voting: theslimer3,
TheCow,
Morgan

Before reading, I'm inclined not to lynch Sup-Zero or Teapot, now GC.

The problem here is that Teapot was pushing the ABR lynch, and then only momentarily switched over to Vettrock without a good explanation for the switch, and then switched back to ABR. It just looked too much like scum voting for the town cred, but switching back when it really mattered.

In post 748, Titus wrote:#189, Texcat should be lynched before Vettrock. Given Vettrock was not the dayvig, if Slimer flips scum, Texcat is almost certainly town. He also avoids giving direct comment on the ABR and Vettock wagons here.

So perhaps I should be hoping that Slimer is scum and throw my vote in, but I'm still thinking that Teapot/GC is a far better lynch. And it bothers me that GC seems to be pushing for a quick lynch on Slimer who was not on his original scum list. He's also deflecting blame already for the mislynch and lining up lynches for after the mislynch.
User avatar
BBmolla
BBmolla
Open Book
User avatar
User avatar
BBmolla
Open Book
Open Book
Posts: 24302
Joined: May 29, 2011

Post Post #759 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:29 pm

Post by BBmolla »

In post 745, Titus wrote:This is wrong. Slimer and Vettock had interactions, even if they weren't direct with each other.

Their interactions consisted of Vettrock always throwing him in as a possible lynch cause slimer is a lurker.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
User avatar
BBmolla
BBmolla
Open Book
User avatar
User avatar
BBmolla
Open Book
Open Book
Posts: 24302
Joined: May 29, 2011

Post Post #760 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:30 pm

Post by BBmolla »

In post 731, Green Crayons wrote:BBmolla. Hero. Sup. Seriously. 728.

I mean, I can't vote slimer any harder
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #761 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:34 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Then slimed is lynched and Wisdom missed your vote.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #762 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:36 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

lol @ anything in this game being "quick"
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #763 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:38 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

^^^ seriously, slimed suspicions were voiced and slimed responded to them at least twice.

If that isn't a sufficiently vetted wagon - regardless of whether you ultimately agree with the wagon - then the sky is green, grass is blue, etc etc.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BBmolla
BBmolla
Open Book
User avatar
User avatar
BBmolla
Open Book
Open Book
Posts: 24302
Joined: May 29, 2011

Post Post #764 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:47 pm

Post by BBmolla »

Oh what the fuck

Can I hammer?
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
User avatar
BBmolla
BBmolla
Open Book
User avatar
User avatar
BBmolla
Open Book
Open Book
Posts: 24302
Joined: May 29, 2011

Post Post #765 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:47 pm

Post by BBmolla »

Or do we want to let deadline run a bit more
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
User avatar
BBmolla
BBmolla
Open Book
User avatar
User avatar
BBmolla
Open Book
Open Book
Posts: 24302
Joined: May 29, 2011

Post Post #766 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:48 pm

Post by BBmolla »

Scum can you guys shoot Hero, that'd be great
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
User avatar
Herodotus
Herodotus
Black Ops
User avatar
User avatar
Herodotus
Black Ops
Black Ops
Posts: 2758
Joined: December 14, 2008

Post Post #767 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:32 pm

Post by Herodotus »

In post 728, theslimer3 wrote:1. Can you really say that's scummy at all? I don't normally say my opinion on anything for that matter. Just because I don't say something doesn't mean I have some ulterior motive of throwing the discussion off or trying to veer off it, so this speculation just seems pointless to me.
2. The deadline was coming up and I had already stated that I wouldn't want ABR lynched (which I was right about his non-gamble btw). Why on earth would I just vote on someone new when I wanted to keep ABR alive, which I've acknowledged as probably town.
3. Well I guess I didn't look hard enough for them to not see them, and unlike you all I don't vote someone for not answering a question (or being there to answer that question for that matter). In fact I'm pretty sparce with my votes if you haven't noticed.

1. I can say that scum have a
motive
to avoid talking about anyone. Notice how we're discussing what vettrock said about people.
2. For one thing, if Teapot was town and lynched, Albert would be dead now regardless. For another, the town can't get anywhere without voting and/or making cases against people who might be scum.
3. If you're scum, that might help your side. If you're town, it means there is less pressure on people and less information, and if you were to stay not voting, the scum would have more control over the lynch.

In post 728, theslimer3 wrote:
In post 664, texcat wrote:
Also still @Slimer, did you miss my questions? I saw your answer about Sup, but didn't see anything about Tea, nka GreenCrayons.

Neut on Tea, except that DayVig. It's possible that he was the one behind that, but there's no proof for that.
I don't like GC though. He voted for Pissop for pretty much a feeling and something that seems off. He also voted me because... Well I'm inactive. And dressed it up to make it seem like it's just a scummy motive behind it. Also It's been noted before that I'm scummy because I'm inactive. Quite possibly a piggyback.

Help me understand why Teapot was more likely to make that daykill than anyone else.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
User avatar
Herodotus
Herodotus
Black Ops
User avatar
User avatar
Herodotus
Black Ops
Black Ops
Posts: 2758
Joined: December 14, 2008

Post Post #768 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:43 pm

Post by Herodotus »

In post 748, Titus wrote:if Slimer flips scum, Texcat is almost certainly town
Agreed.

In post 748, Titus wrote:#555 implies that ABR's shot is something to be feared and a voter changed because they did not fear ABR's shot anymore. This implies town ABR. Someone who thought ABR was scum wouldn't fear a vengeshot on day 1.
I don't follow what you're saying this this paragraph. But it seems relevant that slimer stated a town read on Albert.

In post 749, Titus wrote:Texcat login is a null tell. The vig shot depends just as much on mod availability as submissions.
There was a votecount just a few hours before, so I don't think the delay between the request and the execution was very long. Though there are a lot of players whose online status was hidden, or who were logged in around that time, or who posted in the thread and therefore were logged in.

Titus's first few posts look slightly townish overall.

In post 758, texcat wrote:
The problem here is that Teapot was pushing the ABR lynch, and then only momentarily switched over to Vettrock without a good explanation for the switch, and then switched back to ABR. It just looked too much like scum voting for the town cred, but switching back when it really mattered.
Context matters. Teapot was not quick to jump off of vettrock. They were on vett for two days and were I think the last player off the vettrock wagon.
Why aren't you making the same accusation toward Morgan or Sup-zero?

In post 760, BBmolla wrote:I mean, I can't vote slimer any harder

:lol:
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
User avatar
Titus
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
User avatar
User avatar
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
Moon Walker
Posts: 80307
Joined: May 3, 2013
Pronoun: She/her

Post Post #769 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:39 pm

Post by Titus »

@Texcat, Can you elaborate more on a Teapot/GC team?
Show
The scum had the misfortune of Titus being absurdly accurate on day one.Really quite impressed by that.~Drixx

You're letting Titus win the game by herself.Good luck now I guess.You have no chance to win.~Tywin

GTKTitus Part 2
Titus Academy

VLA Friday nights until Sunday morning.

All hail the Scum Empress!
User avatar
Titus
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
User avatar
User avatar
Titus
She/her
Moon Walker
Moon Walker
Posts: 80307
Joined: May 3, 2013
Pronoun: She/her

Post Post #770 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:41 pm

Post by Titus »

@Hero, I think when I played this setup a couple years ago I was the scum dayvig and asked the mod to show the kills when I was not on...so...
Show
The scum had the misfortune of Titus being absurdly accurate on day one.Really quite impressed by that.~Drixx

You're letting Titus win the game by herself.Good luck now I guess.You have no chance to win.~Tywin

GTKTitus Part 2
Titus Academy

VLA Friday nights until Sunday morning.

All hail the Scum Empress!
User avatar
texcat
texcat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
texcat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2728
Joined: August 18, 2014

Post Post #771 (ISO) » Wed Feb 25, 2015 3:27 am

Post by texcat »

Herodotus wrote:Context matters. Teapot was not quick to jump off of vettrock. They were on vett for two days and were I think the last player off the vettrock wagon.
Why aren't you making the same accusation toward Morgan or Sup-zero?

They had better explanations for their jumps. Teapot's jump onto Vett never made much sense to me. And Teapot was away for a couple of days, but hopped off the Vett wagon pretty soon after her return.

Spoiler:
In post 179, Teapot wrote:VOTE: Vettrock
Morgan is town, unless he's scum with ABR and is panicking after a bus. I won't consider that right now though.
The ABR wagon went way too fast.

(I'm going away for a few days.)

In post 180, Morgan wrote:You wanted to pressure!wagon ABR, and now suddenly the wagon is "too fast"? Your wagon hopping is what's too fast.

Someone remind me why we're not lynching this.

In post 183, Albert B. Rampage wrote:We still can.

In post 185, Sup-Zero wrote:
Agreed.

I still don't know why Teapot wanted to vote ABR in the first place. He claimed that his play "wasn't town" but never bothered to follow up on that or explain it, either.


@Titus, I'm not sure what you're asking. And did you mean the Teapot/GC
slot
?
Morgan on Teapot
I do not like GC's push on Pisskop which was mostly based on his read of Droog. And which I disagree with. I had Droog firmly on the town side. But he seems more interested in lynching anyone.
Spoiler:
In post 674, Green Crayons wrote:slimer: only problem I see is what could be considered active lurking (maybe due to real life issues, so not really alignment indicative), with using a bunch of catchup posts that, uncharitably, could be said are being used to look more active than she actually is. But maybe that's just because I have only skimmed the most recent pages and so haven't really delved into her posts.

In post 695, Green Crayons wrote:That said, in ISOing vett I don't see anything he says about slimer that makes me think "yeah, buddies."

In post 732, Green Crayons wrote:Also, I want to see slimer's flip because pisskop, holy crap.

In post 737, Green Crayons wrote:If slimer flips scum, pisskop is likely town.

If pisskop is town, texcat is more likely to be scum.

Lynch slimer, let's see if this logic chain has teeth to it.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #772 (ISO) » Wed Feb 25, 2015 4:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Casually forgotten:
In post 708, texcat wrote:I agree that Pisskop's voting record has a lot to be desired, but I don't think it's actually as bad as Teapot's.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Herodotus
Herodotus
Black Ops
User avatar
User avatar
Herodotus
Black Ops
Black Ops
Posts: 2758
Joined: December 14, 2008

Post Post #773 (ISO) » Wed Feb 25, 2015 4:34 am

Post by Herodotus »

@texcat: But all those unvotes meant that Teapot was the only person voting vett. And being v/la doesn't negate the time with the vote on; vett could have been lynched during that time.

In post 771, texcat wrote:But he seems more interested in lynching anyone.
True. I don't know what to think of that.
Just because a majority of a group of people decide it's okay doesn't mean it's not murder. - Cobblerfone
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #774 (ISO) » Wed Feb 25, 2015 5:03 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Hero, don't believe lies.

Especially lies backed up by cherry-picked quotes.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Open Games”