In post 924, Flames of Disaster wrote:Your psychology class has taught you well.
Except that you've been sleeping in it quite frequently.
jester?
In post 924, Flames of Disaster wrote:Your psychology class has taught you well.
Except that you've been sleeping in it quite frequently.
In post 925, OkaPoka wrote:In post 924, Flames of Disaster wrote:Your psychology class has taught you well.
Except that you've been sleeping in it quite frequently.
jester?
In post 923, Sakura Hana wrote:Actually you have a point notty, he's attacking the people not their playstyle...
Unvote
Vote: Flames
In post 933, Flames of Disaster wrote:You've never had a cute puppy in your avatar, like ever.
Fake puppy lover.
But, I cannot resist.
VOTE: Flames of Disaster
In post 930, Antihero wrote:VOTE: pisskop
I'VE EXPRESSED THIS SUSPICION FOR A WHILE NOW PISSKOP THIS ISN'T OPPORTUNISTIC
In post 943, pisskop wrote:In post 930, Antihero wrote:VOTE: pisskop
I'VE EXPRESSED THIS SUSPICION FOR A WHILE NOW PISSKOP THIS ISN'T OPPORTUNISTIC
Lul.
Your text screams emotionally charged missrep, which I find incredibly terrible and scummy in general.
. but this says town
what do . . . probably not mention how oppurtunistic this whole game is
In post 914, Flames of Disaster wrote:Notscience is a bad player and an even worse mod. I think that he will get banned from modding in no time.
In post 920, Flames of Disaster wrote:Do you want to respond to my point that you are the worst mod ever?
In post 931, Flames of Disaster wrote:And your poor modding.
In post 945, OkaPoka wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p6380986
proof that Flames of disaster likes to piss people off as scum.