New York 180 (Endgame)


User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5950 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:03 am

Post by dragonspawn »

In post 5947, Kitz wrote:
In post 5946, Kitz wrote:
In post 5945, dragonspawn wrote:Why would the shots be mandatory n2 & n3


Remember the ABR & Math incident?


Oh shit, I just said it loud.

Now they're going to claim having to shot Math. :facepalm:


not if there is really a serial killer. Which I highly doubt.

and neither tso nor GC claimed to attempt to kill our cop on n1. So someone is lying. And I doubt it's tso. Why? Because if he is a SK, then why would he target the cop?

did wolf show any signs of thinking pisscop was scum?
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5951 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:04 am

Post by dragonspawn »

Btw if there is a third shooter why is only one of the supposed hits the missed come forward saying there was an attempt on their life?
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5952 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:11 am

Post by dragonspawn »

Btw did you tell ozgin about you bring a 3 shot vig?
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5953 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:20 am

Post by dragonspawn »

Seems to me that of tso was a serial killer abr would have been killed night 1. A claimed cop is no threat to a SK. A claimed tracker is.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #5954 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:21 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 5953, dragonspawn wrote:Seems to me that of tso was a serial killer abr would have been killed night 1. A claimed cop is no threat to a SK. A claimed tracker is.


A claimed Tracker, who retracts into a VT after reading the PM wrongly from another game (which in itself is Bad Bad Bad to mention), then retracts into a Cop, who then retracted back into a Tracker.
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5955 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:28 am

Post by dragonspawn »

I say we flip GC.i do t believe the claim and the flip would give us crucial Information

good morning I highly recommend that if you are a neighborizer and GC flips scum you find a townie to neighborize.
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5956 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:28 am

Post by goodmorning »

Right, so it isn't 2 Vigs because if it was one of them would be claiming the Boon kill (I assume Scum tried to kill the Cop claim for reasons that should be obvious).

So one of them is an SK. And it's GC.

Also, 3-Shot? Really? In a setup full of fulls and non-consecutives?

That said, we should leash GC. Crosskills will help us.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5957 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:31 am

Post by dragonspawn »

He didn't retract the tracker claim until day 2. To believe GC we have to believe that tso is a serial killer and that he targeted the claimed cop instead of the claimed tracker. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #5958 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:35 am

Post by dragonspawn »

In post 5956, goodmorning wrote:Right, so it isn't 2 Vigs because if it was one of them would be claiming the Boon kill (I assume Scum tried to kill the Cop claim for reasons that should be obvious).

So one of them is an SK. And it's GC.

Also, 3-Shot? Really? In a setup full of fulls and non-consecutives?

That said, we should leash GC. Crosskills will help us.


sounds to me you don't want to see the flip. I do. Because I can't help but notice the only two people who verified your claim is aero who is scum and GC/wolf who is likely lying
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5959 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:06 am

Post by goodmorning »

Groupscum doesn't claim Vig, dragon.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5960 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:07 am

Post by Green Crayons »

elusive was N4

Figured that we wouldn't want the BP player to be revealed to be BP.

But whatever.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5961 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Hey tell me the strategy of SK revealing himself outside of LYLO.

Literally if TSO is not SK, then thread would turn on me and lynch me tomorrow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5962 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5960, Green Crayons wrote:elusive was N4

Figured that we wouldn't want the BP player to be revealed to be BP.

But whatever.

To be BP and having that BP used up.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5963 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:09 am

Post by goodmorning »

elusive got modkilled in the same decision that led to you replacing innnnnnnnn
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5964 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5952, dragonspawn wrote:Btw did you tell ozgin about you bring a 3 shot vig?

???
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5965 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5963, goodmorning wrote:elusive got modkilled in the same decision that led to you replacing innnnnnnnn

Oh.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5966 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:10 am

Post by goodmorning »

which ika needs to update in the OP!
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5967 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:10 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Well first post still has him listed as alive. So that's the mods' fault for not updating.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5968 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:11 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5964, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 5952, dragonspawn wrote:Btw did you tell ozgin about you bring a 3 shot vig?

???
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5969 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:12 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh, is it out that I'm neighbor with Ozgin?

Then yes, SW and Ozgin discussed the 3-shot vig.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5970 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:13 am

Post by goodmorning »

elusive was modkilled in 5764 and you replaced in in 5767 so idek.

p-edit: it's been semi-out since before I replaced in I think.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #5971 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:13 am

Post by goodmorning »

Anyway elusive was a commuter so...
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5972 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Well to make it abundantly clear.

I've been neighbors with House/Ozgin since the beginning of the game. They have a nice 18 page PT where they talk about things.

I was neighbors was goodmorning from March 23 until April 3. I am uncertain if those dates coincide with a night/day cycle or something, and if it was a one-time thing or if goodmonring and I are still neighbors.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5973 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:21 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 5953, dragonspawn wrote:Seems to me that of tso was a serial killer abr would have been killed night 1. A claimed cop is no threat to a SK. A claimed tracker is.

This doesn't make sense.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #5974 (ISO) » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:21 am

Post by Green Crayons »

But you people think that SK would put himself in a 1v1 position outside of LYLO, so I guess y'all love not making sense.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”