Signs and Void (Game Over) [TM2015]
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2364, singersigner wrote:Shadoweh scum read is based on a few things:
1.Her interactions with our slot:From "agreeing" with Tammy in Post 391, to the tone of mentioning Zar in Post 486 (Empire touched on that a bit). The way she voted Bulb in Post 658 and then called our slot town when Empire replaced in seemed unnatural because if she was really switching her vote due to a town read on Empire, it should've come at the same time or before she bothered changing her vote.
2.Stance on Boon not being outed:Post 1173 and Post 1192. Not specifically a scum-tell, but noting because it feels like it's only optimal play for her, which could go either way.
3.Connection to TTH:Because we're scumreading both of them, this point really only makes a difference if either flip scum, but Post 1466 and Post 1653 look like she's specifically avoiding bussing. Her comments about not having a say about the first lynch but jumping onto the second one in Post 1653 is not coming from a town-mindset. I also already brought this up, but asking why there are no votes on my slot suggests that she wants votes to fall on us, which directly contradicts her aforementioned apathy with the first lynch. It really reads as trying to get people to focus on our suspicion rather than TTH's (who was the largest wagon at the time), supporting our scum read of both of them. (adding in that this mindset of not pushing any reads doesn't make sense coming from a team with GI and basically looks like coasting)
Was this post prompted by my post?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2483, Gammagooey wrote:Oversoul wrote:
Also why was Vezok booned. That seemed not very good play and very odd coming from Fferylt from what I remember
vezok was booned because he's obvtown and making ABSOLUTELY sure we didn't give the boon to scum was a very high priority.
By that logic, fferylt should have gotten the boon.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2479, fferyllt wrote:In post 2477, Oversoul wrote:No one ever answered my question of why Espeonage is leading wagon
Also why was Vezok booned. That seemed not very good play and very odd coming from Fferylt from what I remember
going to vote me for it?
uh... no?
I just thought it was odd coming from you given your intelligence/team.
(indirectly calling it a bad move)-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Gamma/ffery or whoever asked, I am starting from my own reads
I have finals today through next week which is why I am being very absent
I do think Singer is town and wonder why so many people think otherwise given Empire and Singer's posts.
Still haven't read Espeonage but feel less inclined to go there over my initial gut scum reads-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2625, mastin2 wrote:
Odd choices given that Thor probably has only some snarky comment in regards to me that boiled down means "I have nothing" and I don't think I've ever played with Llmarble so I'd be pretty dang surprised if he gave some valuable insight on his first go-around.In post 2620, Oversoul wrote:Fferylt, now that Thor and Llmarble are dead could you have them give their opinions on this game? Specifically, CDB, UT, TellTale, and Mastin?
Are you saying that only people who are familiar with your playstyle can analyze your posts?
Fferylt, why is it a weird place to have an existential crisis? I don't think people "plan" on having crises.
Also, get your teammates to comment on the people I singled out in this quoted post?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
You're speaking to my soul Llamarble.
What does he think about Mastin? Also literally the entire Gestalt team is gonna be dead after this day is over.
That's kinda sad.
I have been having conflict thoughts about Singer. I really though that slot was town but it is creeping into "desperate to stay alive" category.
Wagon compositions across all 3 lynch candidates tend to be the same in my mind.-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2969, singersigner wrote:* Concerned about Oversoul/Tammy because why would Tammy replace out over Esp but not Zar? And why is Oversoul trying to start out with completely fresh reads instead of taking into account Tammy's?
Going to nip this in the bud right here, but no.
I don't have time right now because of finals. But just stop while you're ahead, Westeros.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3019, vezokpiraka wrote:In post 3015, Aronis wrote:In post 3013, vezokpiraka wrote:Cab we get back to the espe wagon? It's the only wagon I kinda like right now and this game is fucking dragging. We need to do two lynches in 5 days and we don't even have wagons.
How about we compromise? You vote AD and we lynch him, then immediately after that we can lynch esp.
How about a flash aronis wagon?
Everyone wants this dead.
VOTE: aronis
Speak for yourself!-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3058, singersigner wrote:Like, no one on my team has actually called Gamma scum (except mildly from Mina but shhh), and the only reads list I actually provided put him definitively in the "don't know" pile which I then added a caveat to on my own saying that I only mildly agreed with the "don't know" because I had already very definitively stated I believed Gamma to be town, both at the beginning of my ISO and after our back and forth about his read on me.
I even skimmed my own ISO, to the best of my skimming abilities (gave it a good 30 seconds), just to see if anything stood out to me from your perspective (or what I imagine it would be), and came to that conclusion. Again, I can't figure out how exactly you got "team scum read that you might be disagreeing with at this point" and am totally baffled at what to do right now.
Please explain exactly how you came about this conclusion.
Sure. Part of how I like playing is to get specific reads from specific players, especially if I think that there could be some scum buddy interactions between those two players. As a way to try and get back into the game, I wanted a town read (you) help with reading someone who I can't really read at all (Gamma). I chose you specifically because I remember reading from when Tammy was in the game that Westeros had it out for Gamma. At the time when I read that, I thought the read was very odd since Gamma wasn't doing anything near as scummy as the weird was strong. Also, I felt that you could read Gamma the best since you're probably one of the only people who has had real life interaction with him.
I haphazardly skimmed your iso until I found this from Regfan
In post 1907, singersigner wrote:@Ffery...Regfan would like me to remind you to clarify your town read on Titus.
He would also like me to pass along his reads list...I'm not really sure how to do that without actually C/Ping it, so...
Let's just say that these reads more or less go in descending order of towniness:
Vezok ***
DV ***
Cheer ***
[Gap]
TSO ***
Tammy ***
[Gap]
Aronis
Bulb
GIF *
Marquis *
Esp.
Titus *
Mastin
UT *
CDB ***
Gamma *
AD
[Gap]
TTH
Shadoweh ***
[Gap] = a significant difference between the strength of those reads
bolded = conflicted/null reads of no particular order
* = how strongly I personally agree with both the read and the placement of the read
I thought this list was saying that Reg at least thinks Gamma is scummy. Is this not saying Gamma is fairly scummy? Maybe I am misinterpreting this list but this looks to me that Reg was at least considering Gamma to be the fourth most scummy person in the game at this time.
I think Crtl F'd the word Gamma in your iso and came up with several hits. The first of which was this gem...
In post 1594, singersigner wrote:With regards to Gamma...you're gunna have to be more specific at this point. Vezok was relevant with regards to the game state and information I'm working with, and as far as I can tell...Gamma sure is...a player...
You replied to Bulba asking about your read on Vezok and Gamma with this very non-committal answer about Gamma. I will admit this is probably why I said it was wishy washy, which isn't fair since it is only one instance. I just found it odd given Empire's 672 and how strong that read seemed to be when I first read it. In your defense, I should not have been as shortsighted and probably examined Empire's posts more to see that your team was diminishing that Gamma scum read.
In post 2084, singersigner wrote:I don't like that because I really don't think Gamma's scum despite not having a good reason to vote me.
@Titus...there's a difference between discrediting you and discrediting your argument which was wrong and hypocritical. I'm not sure why you've continued to overlook that. My predecessors don't really need to agree with my positions, nor I theirs and it's really weird that you're even calling on that as an issue. The only one you can even compare it to is Zar since he's still playing TM, but I won't/don't sheep my teammates unconditionally unless I have no choice.
Re: provoking me...can I make it easier for you to understand me? I'm not really sure how my communication has failed since I've been voted.
@GiF...that Gamma vote sucks only because you're using "proxy" as an excuse.
This is currently the 12th? or 11th? mention of Gamma in your iso and it is the only where you come close to having a read on him. Then you start to just get into a conversation with him that sounds like you're town reading him but you never explicitly state it.
Spoiler: quotes yo
This is the time that you give the hard read on him. I'm sorry for having missed this. The Crtl F skim didn't pick this up because well... Yeah, no mention of Gamma in these posts.
So yeah, that's that-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2494, singersigner wrote:@Oversoul...can you clarify Tammy's mistake with her actions one more time?
1. What is this referring to? I can't find anything in my ISO where I said mistake?
In post 2969, singersigner wrote:* Concerned about Oversoul/Tammy because why would Tammy replace out over Esp but not Zar? And why is Oversoul trying to start out with completely fresh reads instead of taking into account Tammy's?
2. What? Why are you concerned about Tammy and I switching? Indulge me for a bit, because it is about to get super self-metay.
Tammy and Oversoul both hate playing scum.
Tammy and Oversoul both spent tokens trying to get town.
Tammy and Oversoul both like playing town.
They like playing town because there is less stress and more freedom.
Tammy and Oversoul would *never* willingly jump into a slot that they *know* is scum.
It was almost a trust tell back when I still played a lot that I would never take a role I knew was scum.
But those aren't the only reasons why this concern is poor form coming from your team, Singer.
Why would Tammy chose to replace out against Espeonage *rather* than Zar? Someone who actually knows her scum game? And someone who has played extensively with Tammy? That makes no sense. Tammy replaced out because Tammy felt that Espeonage had a weird fixation on her, to the point that he would comment on almost every single post that Tammy made. Tammy didn't want to derail the game with that nonsense, so she asked if she could switch. I agreed because I was the most caught up with this game (lol still 60 pages behind) and I thought it would be fun.
So far the fun aspect has yet to show.
Your entire team should *know* how Tammy operates seeing as how often they play with her.
Just look at the situation from Tammy's perspective
- Zar is a scum read
- Zar is not hounding Tammy every post
- Zar is not purposefully misinterpreting posts trying to goad Tammy into a fight
- Tammy was mad at Empire for comments he made, yet still didn't feel personal. Your question/concern is skeevy, but I'm willing to chalk it up to paranoia that always rears its ugly head.
ALL of these things are opposites with Espeonage.
Tammy also says that you should not compare your scum game to Tammy's scum game since she feels that you two play very differently. She says she wouldn't be "worried" about fucking up and that Mina/Zar/Regfan should know that.
And last but not least, why the hell would Tammy switch out of a game where she almost universally town read?
Should send you all to Qyburn to realign your scumdars.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3176, singersigner wrote:Shadoweh's on her vanity wagon, just let her run with it.
Also, I'm on my phone so I can't quote very well...but! My team DOES know Tammy's town meta, and DID have a strong town read of her. The only moments of doubt was your replacing in, which is why we wanted you to clarify those points. I understand you getting defensive, but it seems like you think I've been unclear in my assertions, which were only that the circumstances were a little fuzzy and wanted you to endulge us a little to ease our minds.
At this point, you've explained the second point to my satisfaction since we're obviously biased we didn't know what to read into it. The first...it wasn't in your ISO, it was in Tammy's. I'll have to find it when I'm not on my phone.
Was there anything specific you needed me to answer because a lot of that post was a defense/assertion that we should know better, so I'm not sure where the questions/pressure lies...
Nah, I just said pressure to entice you to stay. I'm a little manipulative like that.
My team and I think you are town. I thought you were town even when Tammy wanted Zar's blood.
In post 3175, ActionDan wrote:Can I get your opinion on Tso oversoul?
I was actually just about to place a vote down on TSO just to get this day over sooner rather than later, but I read through his ISO and I cannot in good faith place that vote. I don't find his play to be all that scummy. I don't see TSO placing fast and free like he did in the beginning of the game or like he did with the self-Boon talk. His reads seem to be developing organically and his posts all read to me as off the cuff without any ulterior motive/plan to fall back on. I think TSO is gonna flip town.
UT, what are your scum reads?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 2295, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 2290, Titus wrote:UT has been friendly but I need more. He's my weakest read though bc this doesn't really match Uncouth mafia.
uncouth is a terrible example of my scum game
Which is it? An accurate example of your play in general? Or not?
While we're at it. Who are you scum reading?
What is the difference between your town play and your scum play if you are so aware of what is a "bad" example of your scum game? (which is also by your own admission your town game)
VOTE: UT
Mastin is also a good vote.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3265, mastin2 wrote:I am a walking deadwoman.
I am town.
I will be dieing, and save for Tales level of incompetency, not by lynch.
This deathdate is going to be sooner rather than later.
Suspicion on me, therefore, just passes entirely over my head. I don't have reason to care. They'll be proven wrong without me needing to lift a finger.
Role related or ego related that you are have a deathdate?
This is actually very important.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3271, mastin2 wrote:
Sure is important!In post 3270, Oversoul wrote:Role related or ego related that you are have a deathdate?
This is actually very important.
But tell me.
Inwhatuniverse would itbe a good idea to answer this question?ever
1. It is role related and people will still marginalize you
2. It is ego related and people will still marginalize you
So, I guess, those universes?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3277, mastin2 wrote:In post 3274, Oversoul wrote:What is your opinion on TTH scum reading you, Mastin?
^In post 3265, mastin2 wrote:It means nothing. I'm both a bit surprised and disappointed that not only Anti but also ETL share that stance apparently, but it's irrelevant. TTH is town, period.
Why do you think they are scum reading you?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3027, ActionDan wrote:To made them fade you'll have to convince people to leave them.
Even myself. I will in the meantime look at Tso.
Breifly reading Oversouls iso, a gut acum read on espe turns into a hated wagon. Why?
Just saw this, what did you get from reading my ISO Dan? Why is the progression from gut scum to dislike necessarily bad?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3197, Gammagooey wrote:VOTE: Aronis
There is an enormous pile of people I would murder at this point though, especially if pointed at by ffery
Is Fferylt your keeper now?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
UT having me, Mastin, Titus, and Singer as scum reads is fine and dandy, but two of those people have viable wagons and you *still* arent voting. You're not thinking like a townie trying to actively suss out scum. And that is scummy as fuck.
More votes on the UT wagon please.
Why are you thinking I could be scum? Because I'm pushing you?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
I was constructing a longer post, but this will just have to do because I am out of time right now.
We are NOT going to waste our second lynch on another person like TSO. This means that Aronis is off the table for lynch today.
The only people that we should be discussing for lynch are ActionDan, Espeonage, Singersigner, Titus, and Untrod Tripod.This means that all vanity votes on individuals other than the ones listed above should be consolidated onto those lynch candidates. AD, Espeonage, and Singer all had substantial wagons on them during the course of the day. The way the TSO wagon formed makes me think that one of these people is scum given the quickness and ease compared to the resistance on these main three. Titus is on the list because she is currently the largest wagon and I think there is a healthy amount of discussion right now concerning her alignment. I personally have a town read on Titus, but I think her posts are approaching levels of negative utility. Plus, Titus has a certain quality of inscrutability that makes me feel that I can never accurately read her. UT is on this list because of selfish reasons. But seriously, UT is scum and everyone should be voting him.
---
In post 3379, Untrod Tripod wrote:bro I think I've more than proven that I'm willing to throw my vote around
your reasoning is bad and you should feel bad
whatevs though, time is short and etc.
vote singer
That is not what my post said. Did you ignore parts of my post? I do not understand how you came to this conclusion given what I actually said in the post. My scum read on you is not because at the time you were not voting. It is your passive, reactive play. You are not actively scumhunting or earnestly trying to figure out the game. When I called you out, you had scum reads on both Singer and Espeonage who had viable wagons, yet you were not voting either of them. You were not actually trying to get them lynched, you were talking and making reads for the sake of talking and having reads. There is a difference.
This post is a perfect example of your passive and reactive play. You did not actually vote a wagon on your scum read until I called you out.
Also, I think you are contradicting yourself.
In post 3292, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 3268, Oversoul wrote:Which is it? An accurate example of your play in general? Or not?
While we're at it. Who are you scum reading?
What is the difference between your town play and your scum play if you are so aware of what is a "bad" example of your scum game? (which is also by your own admission your town game)
a post-restriction game where I replaced into essentially a doomed scumslot late in the game is going to be pretty different from one where I actually got to shape the slot the way I ordinarily would?
is that not patently obvious to you?
You are saying "Uncouth is a bad example of my scumplay" and "I play every game the same way". This is contradictory. By your own admission, you play every game the same way, regardless of alignment. ANY example of ANY of your play would then reflect on play. Sure, you could say that this is null, but what you are saying right now appears to me that there IS a difference between 1) your scum play, or else why try to fight on this point and 2) your play across alignments, again, why else would you try to fight this point.
More votes on UT, please.
---
In post 2575, Oversoul wrote:Gamma/ffery or whoever asked, I am starting from my own reads
I have finals today through next week which is why I am being very absent
I do think Singer is town and wonder why so many people think otherwise given Empire and Singer's posts.
Still haven't read Espeonage but feel less inclined to go there over my initial gut scum reads
ActionDan, is this the comment you're referring to? This is the comment that you are asking "Why"?
I didn't answer your why question because I don't think I ever said I had a gut scum read on Espeonage, or at least I can't remember it now and I can't find it in my ISO either. What I am trying to communicate with that bolded comment is that I don't have a read on Espeonage and I would rather go with a wagon where I at least have some basis for a read (my initial gut scum reads). Espeonage has lived comfortably in null land in my perspective of this game. He is a blind spot that I still have not been able to properly address.
I asked in general (from a theoretical perspective) if the move from gut scum read to disliking the wagon would *necessarily* be bad a thing because I don't think I actually did what you think I did in that post. Clearly something about that transition is causing you concern - what is it?
---
I'm working on a bigger post analyzing the components of the TSO wagon, but it is going to take a substantial amount of work and I probably should have allotted myself more than 24 hours to complete it because I don't actually think I am going to be able to finish it in time.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3451, Titus wrote:@Oversoul, how am I approaching negative utlity?
The sheer quantity of your posts is enough to drown town driven thought. It creates confusion and a smokescreen that the scum are better able to hide in. I don't mean to be offensive, but the content quality of your posts is not enough to offset the benefits given to scum.
pedit:
People went after TSO because he was an easy lynch. He was not really connected with the game and that made him vulnerable and an easy target. Plus, I think he was in the out-group. No one wants to lynch their friends on the first day. It is a subconcious action that seems to generally hold true, at least across the games I have played/observed. I don't think TSO had many friends in this game.
Aronis is in a similar position. I think Aronis is also in the out-group. I think Aronis is also disconnected from the game and that makes him a vulnerable/easy target. The information gained based on Aronis's interactions is negligible, just like the information gained from TSO's interactions was negligible. They both did not have connections because they were disconnected from the game. I think both TSO and Aronis are students and a lot of people seem to be forgetting that right now is finals season for American education.
Fferylt also endorsed the TSO wagon with a lot of force, so Fferylt supporting this wagon is not exactly the biggest vote of confidence. I actually really disagree with Fferylt on a lot of her reads/positions this game. I also think that she is doing a poor job of leading this town. I fear we are headed into a dark tunnel with no escape as long as Fferylt is at the helm. I think this is a function of the fact that Fferylt is an IC right now, which tends to skew perceptions of not only the IC itself, but also the other people in the game. No one really is trying to critically discuss the game with Fferylt so when shitty ideas like the TSO wagon are proposed no one is around to say "No, that is actually a shitty idea".
I actually find it disconcerting that we do not have much more interaction from Fferylt's teammates about this game given the fact that they are ALL DEAD. I would expect they would want to funnel all of their thoughts into the game through her given her confirmed town status. But that is a topic for another time. I know I have been neglecting my own teammates' games.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Agreed 100%.
And don't sweat it, Fferyllt. Happens to everyone.
In post 3454, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 3450, Oversoul wrote:You are saying "Uncouth is a bad example of my scumplay" and "I play every game the same way". This is contradictory. By your own admission, you play every game the same way, regardless of alignment. ANY example of ANY of your play would then reflect on play. Sure, you could say that this is null, but what you are saying right now appears to me that there IS a difference between 1) your scum play, or else why try to fight on this point and 2) your play across alignments, again, why else would you try to fight this point.
it can still be shitty when you replace into a more-or-less confirmed scum slot late in the game. it cuts of a lot of your options. yeah my tone and approach are pretty much the same, but if you want to know how I would approach something you should pick a game where I am more able to manipulate the gamestate to my faction's advantage. take a look at MS Fantasy Camp 2 if you're into the whole meta thing (which it kind of seems like you are). I'm saying if you want to do some kind of tonal analysis or whatever it gives you a *really* narrow view of my approach as scum because my course was more or less set before I replaced in
I must not be properly explaining why I view this as a contradiction. I'm not interested in your meta, UT. I am interested in you saying X, then saying Y, (which have two completely different conclusions on the same subject) and trying to assert that both opposite conclusions are true.
That said, the contradiction aspect of my post was only one part of it. I completely disproved your defense about moving your vote, and yet you don't address that?
In post 3461, Untrod Tripod wrote:also calling for votes on someone else when you've stated that you want to look at a 1-in-3 group of people of different is pretty ineffective planning and just looks like you're trying to say things you think people want to hear and give yourself license to plop down a vote on one of the big wagons and make it look like some kind of principled stance
and no it's not the list of players, it's that you're putting on airs about it and trying to paint yourself as some kind of leader
you're not
you're just someone saying what literally everyone wants to hear. you've expressed an interest in voting for at least one of everyone's scumreads.
I'm not impressed
1. I am trying to consolidate votes so that a lynch can be properly achieved.
2. I am simultaneously trying to consolidate information about the popular wagons that peoplestillhave grumblings about (AD, Esp, Singer).
I've already stated that I think Singer is town and I think have made it abundantly clear that I want your lynch above all else UT. It is a principled stance. There is a massive amount of malaise in this game and so many people are trying to do their own thing, all unsuccessfully. Sure, some are trying to form a townbloc but they are doing it with the wrong players and for the wrong reasons.
There are too many low impact players in this game and the few high impact players are not doing what they should be doing in cultivating discussion or useful wagons. I'm trying to bring life back into this game because clearly, judging by the TSO wagon, everyone just wants to be rid of this day.
UT, tell me where I expressed an interest in voting "for at least one of everyone's scumreads". Me telling everyone that these specific people should be the ones voted is not saying I think these people are scum. It is trying to get shit done in the face of people like you who just want complain about the length of the day and vote anything that comes close to lynch.
In post 3463, TellTaleHeart wrote:In post 3450, Oversoul wrote:We are NOT going to waste our second lynch on another person like TSO. This means that Aronis is off the table for lynch today.
The only people that we should be discussing for lynch are ActionDan, Espeonage, Singersigner, Titus, and Untrod Tripod.
"We're only lynching between these people becauseI'mscumreading them."
Titus, and now you?
Excuse me, this goes out to everyone in this game: Who the fuck do you people think you are?
In post 3464, TellTaleHeart wrote:I think pretty much everyone is in need of some form of ego check here.
Again, that isn't what I am saying. I'm not scumreading all of those people. I literally called Singer town in one of my previous posts. Wagon analysis in the context of who votes for who, when, and against what sort competing counter wagons is one of the most useful pieces of information in Mafia.
And to answer your question, I am the hero this town needs.
What is your opinion of UT?
In post 3496, ActionDan wrote:Yes that was the post. I didn't catch the "s" in "reads" I guess since I interpreted that as distancing yourself from a gut scum read on him. If that wasn't the case then I would be concerned because changing reads on a player without explanation is convenient for scum since usually it's not questioned. That said, I still am not sure why you'd hate a wagon on a null player. Most people would feel "whatever" about it.
I hated Espeonage's wagon because of who was on it, not because it was on Espeonage specifically. If it had been Singer with those same people voting I would have hated it just the same. At the time of that post, both UT and CDB were on the wagon and they were my first two main scumreads in this game.
In post 3474, Titus wrote:So yeah I don't care if I'm annoying Oversoul by posting. I'm going to try to make this a quality post to explain to you why Mastina is obvious town from my perspective.
More posts like 3474! That was awesome and it is the only thing I'm looking for really.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3497, ActionDan wrote:In post 3450, Oversoul wrote:given the quickness and ease compared to the resistance on these main three.
This isn't true for my wagon. I am absolutely sure I was realistically 1-off from a lynch before I started posting
Fair. This gives me an idea though...-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
I'm trying to get in good by shitting on their play? Ok.
I only want UT's lynch, Dan. When you put it that way, yeah it does look shitty and illogical.
i think I should clarify that I am only limiting the options because we are so close to deadline and this day has largely been inefficient. If a lynch does land on one of those five, at least that restores some efficiency to the game. Yes UT death makes the game less efficient but I think he is scum and don't want another "let's settle and vote some random dude" lynch. The list also forestalls that type of activity so in general I think it is pro-town to do at a time like this-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3504, Untrod Tripod wrote:1. you didn't disprove jack shit
2. I don't have to do anything you say
3. I answered the part that was wrong on an objective basis rather than just a misunderstanding of basic motivations and behaviors basis, since it seemed important to get that part cleared up for the rest of the audience
1. Yes. Yes, I did.
In post 3377, Oversoul wrote:UT having me, Mastin, Titus, and Singer as scum reads is fine and dandy, but two of those people have viable wagons and you *still* arent voting. You're not thinking like a townie trying to actively suss out scum. And that is scummy as fuck.
More votes on the UT wagon please.
Why are you thinking I could be scum? Because I'm pushing you?
In post 3379, Untrod Tripod wrote:bro I think I've more than proven that I'm willing to throw my vote around
your reasoning is bad and you should feel bad
whatevs though, time is short and etc.
vote singer
In post 3450, Oversoul wrote:That is not what my post said. Did you ignore parts of my post? I do not understand how you came to this conclusion given what I actually said in the post. My scum read on you is not because at the time you were not voting. It is your passive, reactive play. You are not actively scumhunting or earnestly trying to figure out the game. When I called you out, you had scum reads on both Singer and Espeonage who had viable wagons, yet you were not voting either of them. You were not actually trying to get them lynched, you were talking and making reads for the sake of talking and having reads. There is a difference.
This post is a perfect example of your passive and reactive play. You did not actually vote a wagon on your scum read until I called you out.
Read these three quotes and tell me that I didn't disprove what you were saying.
Your response to my suspicion on you was "Yes, I have been moving my vote around your point is wrong". I replied saying to you that your vote and your scum reads did not match up at all at a point in the game when they SHOULD have. You were complaining about this day dragging on so you voted TSO to end the day quicker. You have scumreads on not ONE but TWO viable wagons at a point that is now CLOSER TO DEADLINE and you still are not even voting LET ALONE the fact that you had scum reads.
2. Sure you don't. But that isn't what a townie thinks. A townie who wants to accomplish something and work with other towns people would at least be trying to engage me in discussion. You're just telling me wrong I am wrong, not going into ANY depth at all to explain that opinion.
3. I'm not following. What does this mean?
In post 3508, Untrod Tripod wrote:this is shitty and illogical and I am willing to admit that, but I'm gonna go ahead and do it anyway when we have actual options that aren't just a vanity wagon for me THAT I AM WILLING TO LYNCH is vote for a vanity wagon
I've explained this numerous times. I THINK YOU'RE SCUM. I think that of *all* the lynch candidates today that *you* are more scummy than any of them. I am going to fight for your lynch.
I gave everyone else parameters for a lynch because I knew it was going to be an uphill battle to get you lynched but I specifically DID NOT WANT a lynch on a person who was not already discussed today. I admitted you are an exception to the rule but the only reason is because *I* think you're scum. Yes, that is selfish and egotistical but no one else in this game has really given me any indication that they ACTUALLY CARE about who gets lynched today. Given that, I am MORE THAN OKAY to push people around/bruise some people to get you lynched or at least prevent another lurker lynch.
My parameters have LITERALLY NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU AS A SCUM READ OR MY BASIS FOR SCUM READING YOU. Yet here you are. Choosing to try and discredit me rather than talk about things.
In post 3509, ActionDan wrote:In post 3506, Oversoul wrote:I'm trying to get in good by shitting on their play? Ok.
I only want UT's lynch, Dan. When you put it that way, yeah it does look shitty and illogical.
i think I should clarify that I am only limiting the options because we are so close to deadline and this day has largely been inefficient. If a lynch does land on one of those five, at least that restores some efficiency to the game. Yes UT death makes the game less efficient but I think he is scum and don't want another "let's settle and vote some random dude" lynch. The list also forestalls that type of activity so in general I think it is pro-town to do at a time like this
I think a good thing to do would be at least take a look at Espe. (And also, like an opinion on me for completion)
Ok. I'll look into Espeonage later today.
I think you're town although I'm not entirely sure how strong I feel about that. I disliked your early game when I was reading it, but I never fancied your style of play even when I was more active. It always felt scummy to me. I didn't like your Espeonage case because it seemed more like "pay attention to me! I'm doing town things" rather than you wanting to analyze Espeonage's play.
That said, I thought your Singer analysis was a step in the right direction and that your conversations with me are fairly town. I do think that this is a bit of a recency issue though (recency is also why I think some people voted for TSO despite him having a fairly strong early town game).-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3518, Oversoul wrote:Your response to my suspicion on you was "Yes, I have been moving my vote around your point is wrong". I replied saying to you that your vote and your scum reads did not match up at all at a point in the game when they SHOULD have. You were complaining about this day dragging on so you voted TSO to end the day quicker. You have scumreads on not ONE but TWO viable wagons at a point that is now CLOSER TO DEADLINE and you still are not even voting LET ALONE the fact that you had scum reads.
Furthermore, UT, if you were truly uncaring about moving your vote around whichever way why were you ever not voting? Why did it take you 23 posts between your first post the day after TSO was lynched until you ACTUALLY placed your first vote for the second lynch on Singer?
That does not reconcile in my mind. If you say you don't care about where your vote is and that you move it around as much as you want (which you seem to be wanting to imply is townie?) why didn't you just vote anyone right out of the gate and move it around accordingly?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 3520, Untrod Tripod wrote:I hope for your sake that you're scum
because you should be embarrassed post-game if you aren't
Nope. Just stubborn.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Ok. I am tired of all this babble about wanting Singer or Titus lynched. I'm ending this now.
Sure, I can see the reasons why people think Singer is scum but I think there is more reason to think she is town given her play. She has a natural cadence/posting style that just seems suspicious on face value, but her actions look fairly town to me.
pedit:
Damn.
That slew of posts makes me feel really conflicted about you, UT.
UGH JUST ADMIT YOU ARE FUCKING SCUM IF YOU ARE
UT, but your teammates are reading and giving opinions on other games they are not in? They are just flat out ignoring this game?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
I agree that my expectations of your play might be too high, maybe even completely out of line given your personality. I have opinions of "this is how a reasonable townie would act/play" and it is partly based off how I play. That might be the issue.
You and I have such vastly different playstyles, that when I see you playing and not doing "reasonable townie" things my mind goes red alert. But damn though, your play has never felt like you had conviction or desire to even root out the scum.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Gut scum read CDB is about to get lynched?
I can't resist.
I read Espeonag'es iso before I got sick and the things that stuck out to me were 1) how often he changed his vote, specifically to leading wagons which did not feature heavily in his iso, 2) his Tammy interactions, 3) I do not buy his Detect story.
If he really was a VT, what is the point of detecting really? Trace seems to at least grant a partial roleblock or forestall potential scum power role use.
That said, the CDB wagon looks good.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
-
-
-