In post 6298, Shinobi wrote:That depends; are reflexive vigilantes a thing or no?
I honestly don't know the roles too well here on MS.
They're not. Reflexive as a modifier is rare.
Mass murderer is also not a thing.
In post 6298, Shinobi wrote:That depends; are reflexive vigilantes a thing or no?
I honestly don't know the roles too well here on MS.
In post 6299, Kitz wrote:
Yes, seriously. 3 attacks on first night and then either 1 or none. I was either thinking mass murderer (I couldn't find it on the wiki), so I thought it was the town role (off-site names) veteran / grandma / hateful. Everyone said no, one way or another.
In post 6305, goodmorning wrote:3weird5me
In post 6234, Marquis wrote:ika can you describe what tso's role specifically did? differences from normal sk?
In post 1889, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1886, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're not supposed to be informed when you're saved...that means you're lying.
Is that the standard here?
In post 1890, Nobody Special wrote:Pretty much, yeah.
In post 1891, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Not seeing a vote, NS.
In post 1892, Nobody Special wrote:Probably because I haven't voted yet.
In post 6309, ika wrote:Mass murder though is very much a real role.
In post 6306, Green Crayons wrote:Can someone explain to me what the reflexive modifier is, and how it relates to N1 and what Kitz said or didn't say?
In post 6310, Marquis wrote:oh ok
boon claimed mainly doc, but possibility of other PRs day 1
so pisskop had reason to roleblock boon, and tso had reason to kill boon
so piss died because he also visited boon?? i think
wow this solves things a lot more nicely
also this role is pretty far removed from normal role interactions so ugh tso got by only on the double kill there
In post 6310, Marquis wrote:oh ok
boon claimed mainly doc, but possibility of other PRs day 1
so pisskop had reason to roleblock boon, and tso had reason to kill boon
so piss died because he also visited boon?? i think
wow this solves things a lot more nicely
also this role is pretty far removed from normal role interactions so ugh tso got by only on the double kill there
In post 6314, Shinobi wrote:In post 6310, Marquis wrote:oh ok
boon claimed mainly doc, but possibility of other PRs day 1
so pisskop had reason to roleblock boon, and tso had reason to kill boon
so piss died because he also visited boon?? i think
wow this solves things a lot more nicely
also this role is pretty far removed from normal role interactions so ugh tso got by only on the double kill there
This just leaves one question:
How did mafia know there was a 3p role in the setup?
In post 6309, ika wrote:In post 6234, Marquis wrote:ika can you describe what tso's role specifically did? differences from normal sk?
I can. But the real question of "will I" is no.
Mass murder though is very much a real role.
All flavor should be public; flavor is not allowed in Role PMs.Role names should be standard, or non-flavored if original.
Flavor should have no bearing on the game -it should be possible for a player to read only the role reveals posted with the death scene and gain all information needed to play. This information should be formatted to stand out from the flavor.