New York 180 (Endgame)


User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #6275 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 6225, ika wrote:
kitz: goodmornign
ozgin: Cheetory6, kitz, dragon, T S O, ozgin
T S O: Marquis, green crayons [l-2]

9 alive, 5 lynch

(expired on 2015-04-21 21:00:00)

Who isn't voting in this VC?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #6276 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I count 8, but there's no "not voting" category.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #6277 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't think Marq is lynch worthy based off of yesterday's play.

There's probably a bit of "she and I did the same thing" involved, but her rapid-fire jumping back and forth between TSO-GC-Ozgin looks too un-calculated for scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #6278 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:16 am

Post by Green Crayons »

her / him ?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #6279 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:59 am

Post by dragonspawn »

Shinobi didn't vote.

I like good mornings invite. Marquises looked like sheeping.
User avatar
dragonspawn
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
dragonspawn
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3558
Joined: May 10, 2014

Post Post #6280 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:02 am

Post by dragonspawn »

Unvote rather. I don't think kits and marquis are both scum
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #6281 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:29 am

Post by goodmorning »

In post 6267, Marquis wrote:VOTE: shinobi

and gm we need to touch up on this. I let this read fall to the wayside with the TSO focus, but now that I'm feeling much much much more confident about my old reads around then I'm thinking this and/or kitz could be it.

I don't disagree, but I think there's more evidence for Kitz.

In post 6268, Shinobi wrote:
In post 6267, Marquis wrote:VOTE: shinobi

and gm we need to touch up on this. I let this read fall to the wayside with the TSO focus, but now that I'm feeling much much much more confident about my old reads around then I'm thinking this and/or kitz could be it.


I was the counterwagon to scum you imbecile.

Scum can also be the counterwagon to Scum.

In post 6273, Kitz wrote:I asked a million fucking times about 3P being something else than SK and all of you said SK is the only acceptable role. :facepalm:
This changes
everything
.

"The game should have at least one Mafia or Werewolf group (of at least two members). A second anti-town group can be given a separate Mafia family name, or can be a Werewolf group. There should be no more than two mafia/werewolf factions, and no more than one Serial Killer."
-Normal Game

Everyone denied the "Visit Kill Role" suggestion. :facepalm:

OH LOOK A SCUMCLAIM

Also, seriously? I have screamed all this fucking game that Meta is bullshit. You're associating me with Piss out of the blue as an early bus, I counter-logiced it with the circumstance that something's wrong with House and you should look there instead, and now you use House Meta against me? That's some meta bullshit right there.

Nobody's said anything about anyone's meta.

In post 6275, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 6225, ika wrote:
kitz: goodmornign
ozgin: Cheetory6, kitz, dragon, T S O, ozgin
T S O: Marquis, green crayons [l-2]

9 alive, 5 lynch

(expired on 2015-04-21 21:00:00)

Who isn't voting in this VC?

Shinobi.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6282 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:07 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 6281, goodmorning wrote:OH LOOK A SCUMCLAIM


How is that a scum claim? I think you're just tunneling me at this point.
If this was a scum claim, I'd be all like "Hey fucks, I'm the actual serial killer".

In post 6281, goodmorning wrote:I don't disagree, but I think there's more evidence for Kitz.
In post 6281, goodmorning wrote:Nobody's said anything about anyone's meta.


How about, shut up? Your tunneling is rather blatant and annoying now, with excuses and tunnel-slips everywhere.
If you want to get me, be more constructive and stop contradicting yourself. Here's the 2 most recent examples on meta on House.

In post 6245, goodmorning wrote:I should probably see if House claimed Scum with anyone other than Kitz.

Meta 1. This is Your piece of the meta. Otherwise, you wouldn't see it as a meta thing, it's a House related thing.
In post 6254, dragonspawn wrote:house busses his scum buddies like crazy when he is scum. I can see his sarcastic comments being truthful

Meta 2.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6283 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:11 am

Post by Kitz »

Honestly, if it wasn't for that unvote, I'd tunnel the hell out of you.
If you were scum, that was the most stupid move you could've done.

This troubles me :
If this is the town, unwilling to look at player's claims and just sheep/tunnel, Town will not get anywhere at all.
In that case, I might randomly vote myself and watch scum jump on, because I'm not going to cooperate if half the players are uncooperative and unproductive to the actual game.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6284 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:17 am

Post by Shinobi »

Kitz, you don't get to complain about being tunneled when you keep voting me for stupid reasons.

"Scumpoints for not voting Ozgin in a scum v scum cross, even though he was the counterwagon to scum the day before."
Fucking seriously.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6285 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:21 am

Post by Kitz »

You backseat too much, you reserve the votes too much, you have objected the wrong players, you have scumread the wrong players, some of your reasoning didn't make sense at all, your reaction on my poking with you on a stick were a very big blast from you as if you thought I were a cop who found you guilty of scum.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6286 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:25 am

Post by Shinobi »

Except none of that is true.
:neutral:

What is this nonsense?
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6287 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:47 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 6286, Shinobi wrote:Except none of that is true.
:neutral:

What is this nonsense?


B PLZ

Spoiler:
In post 6285, Kitz wrote:you reserve the votes too much

Didn't vote at all since this vote, who mind you, were town, and it looked sheepishly.

In post 5628, Shinobi wrote:
In post 5624, Marquis wrote:my first thought was some sort of jailkeep

also this spec is ridiculous

VOTE: elusive

only thing i'm doing today

bye


I was literally about to post the same thing.

VOTE: elusive

Let's get this done.





In post 6285, Kitz wrote:you have objected the wrong players

In post 5906, Shinobi wrote:I know. I'm still waiting for Marquis to give his case because I don't like the Ozgin wagon and I'm having trouble finding alternatives.

In post 6100, Shinobi wrote:The Ozgin push reads as a bunch of garbage but so does the TSO push.





In post 6285, Kitz wrote:your reaction on my poking with you on a stick were a very big blast from you as if you thought I were a cop who found you guilty of scum.


In post 2204, Shinobi wrote:I've also got a bone to pick with Kitz but I accept the fact that I could be biased in that regard. I don't know where her townread on me from earlier came from and it seems like her scumread is based on me not talking to other people, so I don't really know how that could affect her read.


In post 2402, Kitz wrote:Shin's scummier too.

In post 3053, Shinobi wrote:And I'm taking kitz off of my townlean list for her #2402.


In post 3136, Shinobi wrote:Lmao no it doesn't. You've been listing me as scummy for stupid bullshit since the start of day 2, and kept putting me as scummier because of imaginary reasons afterwards.

That's when you don't have reason. "Stupid bullshit" is "he's scummier"? Couldn't you have said that? You did not even see the reasons.

In post 3137, Shinobi wrote:I want to kill Kitz.

In post 3698, Shinobi wrote:Kitz is annoying me again.


In post 3834, Shinobi wrote:Poking "Nobody Special", "Shinoby", "T S O" and "Aeronaut".

In post 3834, Shinobi wrote:Literally the worst scumlist of all time.


In post 4082, Shinobi wrote:I found it suspicious that Kitz kept coming up with 50 billion excuses to scumread me which gets tiring after a while. I have issues sorting newer players attacking me sometimes since it's hard for me to tell if them being wrong is a matter of newness or scumness.


In post 4600, Shinobi wrote:So if we don't lynch either of those two players, who do we lynch?

I propose Kitz. It will be fun, if nothing else.

In post 4601, Shinobi wrote:(I'm aware that feels don't make someone town but, with Kitz' life on the line, why not take a chance?)

In post 4603, Shinobi wrote:I'd be pressing the issue harder if I didn't have the opportunity to get people to lynch Kitz.


In post 4614, Shinobi wrote:I've also explained that killing Kitz would be grand because she keeps calling me mafia for little to nothing, and it seems like she keeps coming up with excuses to scumread me. She's been on about lynching me since day 1 and hasn't really ever gotten to it nor has she had any interest in questioning me.


And it suddenly evolved to "Since day 1".

In post 4617, Kitz wrote:The third, I didn't push a lynch on you.

In post 4617, Kitz wrote:Here's my read on you : You're not endangered. You have biased opinions. You have selective reading. You're defending lynchbaits and scummy players in a very oddly neutral way. Because of my poking and suspecting of you, you're now passive-aggressive and semi-tunnel on me, with just that as a basis and none else.

Because I'm conflicted about you, I'll leave this vote here. You say I've been meaning to lynch you, but here's the thing : I have never voted on you, until now.
VOTE: Shinobi

In post 4627, Shinobi wrote:Everything you post is stupid.


In post 4770, Shinobi wrote:
Nobody fucking cares what you think about the interactions or how they matter at all. Kitz is voting me for bullshit as of right now and she was on the exact same spot on your lynch list as I was, and it didn't seem to bother you at all.


In post 4839, Shinobi wrote:I can see these are words but I don't see how they coincide with actual things.

*Where is the lack of initiative?
*Where is the lack of direct discussion on "appropriate things" and where do you think my attention should be?
*Why does me "freaking out" about how many votes I have make me scum?
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6288 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:54 am

Post by Shinobi »

You didn't even fucking give me reasons. You've just been tunneling me all game over complete fucking nonsense like "he was wrong" or "he didn't vote the right people" even though it was a scum v scum cross and it didn't fucking matter who I voted anyway, and even then, I was the one pushing the Aeronaut wagon over almost everything else.

Read the fucking game you moron.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6289 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:58 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 6288, Shinobi wrote:Read the fucking game you moron.


VOTE: Kitz
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6290 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:59 am

Post by Shinobi »

Ugh. Don't do that.

Now I feel bad.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6291 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:29 am

Post by Shinobi »

Kitz, I'm sorry if I yelled at you but it feels like you're not listening to a word I say about anything and it's starting to get really frustrating considering we're two months into this. At some point some kind of reassessment needs to happen and I'm getting annoyed that you're just using whatever ammo you can against me.

Can we make this happen or no?
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #6292 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:33 am

Post by goodmorning »

In post 6282, Kitz wrote:
In post 6281, goodmorning wrote:OH LOOK A SCUMCLAIM


How is that a scum claim? I think you're just tunneling me at this point.
If this was a scum claim, I'd be all like "Hey fucks, I'm the actual serial killer".

I didn't even consider a reflexive element to the SK as being a possibility, though it does seem the logical conclusion now it's been brought up.

You
knew
there was one. So, looking back, did Ozgin.

In post 6281, goodmorning wrote:I don't disagree, but I think there's more evidence for Kitz.

How about, shut up? Your tunneling is rather blatant and annoying now, with excuses and tunnel-slips everywhere.
If you want to get me, be more constructive and stop contradicting yourself.

There's no need to be rude.
I know it sucks being caught by associative cases, but there's really no call for that.

In post 6245, goodmorning wrote:I should probably see if House claimed Scum with anyone other than Kitz.

Meta 1. This is Your piece of the meta. Otherwise, you wouldn't see it as a meta thing, it's a House related thing.

I was saying I should see if House claimed Scum with anyone other than you IN THIS GAME.
If he did it would dial down the likelihood of you being Scum.
That's not even close to meta. That's solely in-game actions.

In post 6254, dragonspawn wrote:house busses his scum buddies like crazy when he is scum. I can see his sarcastic comments being truthful

Meta 2.

That's not meta being used to say something new, it's just confirming that an existing point isn't impossible.

Nobody's saying "House always claims Scum with his buddies lol."

In post 6286, Shinobi wrote:Except none of that is true.

No, you do perhaps reserve your vote a tad too much.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6293 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:36 am

Post by Shinobi »

I don't see what I'm doing wrong with my vote tbh.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6294 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:41 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 6292, goodmorning wrote:I didn't even consider a reflexive element to the SK as being a possibility, though it does seem the logical conclusion now it's been brought up.

You knew there was one. So, looking back, did Ozgin.


It's the explanation of the first night, it's logical. Stop turning logic against me.
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #6295 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:42 am

Post by goodmorning »

In post 6294, Kitz wrote:Stop turning logic against me.

Seriously?
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6296 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:43 am

Post by Shinobi »

In post 6294, Kitz wrote:
In post 6292, goodmorning wrote:I didn't even consider a reflexive element to the SK as being a possibility, though it does seem the logical conclusion now it's been brought up.

You knew there was one. So, looking back, did Ozgin.


It's the explanation of the first night, it's logical. Stop turning logic against me.


lol
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #6297 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:44 am

Post by goodmorning »

So, Shinobi, what do you think? Scumslip or no?
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Shinobi
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Shinobi
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6138
Joined: February 12, 2014
Location: NC

Post Post #6298 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:47 am

Post by Shinobi »

That depends; are reflexive vigilantes a thing or no?

I honestly don't know the roles too well here on MS.
User avatar
Kitz
Kitz
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kitz
Goon
Goon
Posts: 633
Joined: October 3, 2014

Post Post #6299 (ISO) » Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:48 am

Post by Kitz »

In post 6295, goodmorning wrote:
In post 6294, Kitz wrote:Stop turning logic against me.

Seriously?


Yes, seriously. 3 attacks on first night and then either 1 or none. I was either thinking mass murderer (I couldn't find it on the wiki), so I thought it was the town role (off-site names) veteran / grandma / hateful. Everyone said no, one way or another.

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”