mini 1662: Paint the village red
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Why in the hell would you want to policy slandaar?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 31, Unvotable wrote:SKOT is in this game aswell? Town has no chance
That one I can laugh at because I have had my run ins with skot in the past.
On a another subject I do have a town read on radiantcowbells through. If she does turn out town I can start investigating a possible town tell in future games.
@radiant
What gender pronoun should I use for you he/she/it/they-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 35, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 24, RadiantCowbells wrote:
There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
Serious vote.
Can I ask why you think radiant is scum since it's serious?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 37, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Vote parking.
I don't really agree with that assessment.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 39, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 24, RadiantCowbells wrote:
There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.
I'm just going to quote this again for you so you can read it.
My vote doesn't change today = vote parking.
I have said the same things as town before sometimes I carry through sometimes I don't. Also if Radiant is showing awareness of his/her/it surroundings and commenting on them and showing that radiant is trying to work out things I'm fine with keeping them around.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 41, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:That makes it sound like as long as someone is putting in *effort* they earn a town read from you.
That's pretty weak if that's the case.
Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.
Also scum slip up there's a difference between working things out and trying to look town. Also with lynchs and night kills information is provided player who have provided information are easier to read.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 44, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 42, Garmr wrote:
Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.
This is weird because you both attacked and defended my action in the same sentence.
Not really weird since I just disagree with your reasoning. I'm not really to sure your motives behind it at the moment I'm trying to figure out if your thinking on a simple level or being opportunistic.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 46, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Yeah, I wouldn't look too deep into the reasoning for voting somebody on p2.
It's still a legitimate vote though. It's easy for scum to vote park early in a game, watch the game from the sidelines to see what direction it starts to flow in and then make their decision for how they want to proceed from there.
Why would scum announce it through they wouldn't want the heat on them. You voting them is a perfect example as why it's also negative for scum. Radiant cowbells optimal as scum would not to announce it and just vote park till latter on in the game. that way you can avoid a lot of this suspicion.
In post 47, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:The 'opportunistic' comment also seems like a buzzword you have just thrown out.
Can you explain how it's opportunistic?
It's a easy thoughtless vote that normally people wouldn't question you on.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 50, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 48, Garmr wrote:
Why would scum announce it through they wouldn't want the heat on them. You voting them is a perfect example as why it's also negative for scum. Radiant cowbells optimal as scum would not to announce it and just vote park till latter on in the game. that way you can avoid a lot of this suspicion.
To preemptively counter any attack for their vote parking?
I think it looks much more suspicious to vote park quietly.
This is just entering wifom zone but anyway you put it they are drawing negative attention to themselves.
In post 48, Garmr wrote:
It's a easy thoughtless vote that normally people wouldn't question you on.
And the opportunity I have created for myself is...
Would of been a excuse to lay a easy vote for a while.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 52, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 51, Garmr wrote:
This is just entering wifom zone but anyway you put it they are drawing negative attention to themselves.
No, they're not. It's not WIFOM, we simply have different opinions. WIFOM is an easy way to stop this discussion though.
Oh, you mean like RadiantCowbells did...
It's wifom because we could keep going on forever about as it's basicly scum wouldn't do that because A,scum would do that because you wouldn't expect A, But scum knows that your thinking that way so scum would do this, but scum knows that scum knows. See my point about how you were going to draw that into wifom territory. I'm starting to feel like you have the simple thought process and are trying to sound smarter than you are.
Radiant seemed genuine with radiant's vote. You can easily read that and it flows well.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 60, massive wrote:In post 48, Garmr wrote:Why would scum announce it through they wouldn't want the heat on them. You voting them is a perfect example as why it's also negative for scum. Radiant cowbells optimal as scum would not to announce it and just vote park till latter on in the game. that way you can avoid a lot of this suspicion.
Do you have experience with RC that would suggest optimal scum play?
Also, VOTE: Garmr, Lynch All Liars and I'm pretty sure his first post contains a lie.
Well they do say being sexy is a crime and no experience with rc just concluding what I think is logical.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
My opinion about radiant hasn't changed.
Wanderers approach to the conversation makes me a bit suspicious. He took to the sidelines and there seems to be hesitance for the radiant vote.
In post 125, Wanderer-nl wrote:Thanks for taking away a legitimate vote on RC for me.
I'm not the kind of person to add a vote to every push.
I think this post is extremely scummy. This is like why did you ruin my moment to vote thing.
I would explain it in more but I'm extremely frustrated and being rushed to make dinner. So that's just the basic sum of it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 142, Wanderer-nl wrote:@Garmr: what is making you townread RC?
But I find Rc pretty town as Rc town telled before even arguing with bluey. Also I don't really see her/his actions as scummy I already have argued this with blue.
In post 141, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 139, Garmr wrote:My opinion about radiant hasn't changed.
Wanderers approach to the conversation makes me a bit suspicious. He took to the sidelines and there seems to be hesitance for the radiant vote.
In post 125, Wanderer-nl wrote:Thanks for taking away a legitimate vote on RC for me.
I'm not the kind of person to add a vote to every push.
I think this post is extremely scummy. This is like why did you ruin my moment to vote thing.
I would explain it in more but I'm extremely frustrated and being rushed to make dinner. So that's just the basic sum of it.
I understand you feel this way. I shouldn't have said this because it's referring to an ongoing game to be perfectly honest.
Now, if I had voted RC when BBT asked me to, would you not have questions about that?
I don't think I really could have made the right response here, other than to just do nothing. I can already read why BBT is voting so no need to ask that, and really, I'm still considering the possibility of scum establishing themselves as town early in the game. And I also don't follow unconfirmed players.
Your vote on me feels like a OMGUS-by-proxy. I look forward to your explanation.
And it feels really weird to read about myself as a male. But if you feel better calling me 'he', I'll get used to it.
I'm sorry wanderer about the gender thing.
Yeh but I don't understand why you wouldn't vote earlier as you didn't really show much indication of wanting to vote RC. Also why would you be worried about pressure on you if the belief is sincere?
I did semi explain it that it feels like you were waiting on the sidelines waiting for the right time to vote. In fact If I go through your iso the only time you actually show intention to vote Rc is when you think rc accuses you of being her number 1 vote if she wasn't here.
I read this as her saying blue is having you as the number 1 read. You haven't actually seemed to picked up on this and provided a omgus vote. Through misunderstanding I think you just slipped badly.
Also that was a bad attempt at prematurely trying to discredit my vote by calling it omgus by proxy pff.
PS dinner was delicious and so was the wine that followed :p.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 148, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 144, Garmr wrote:
But I find Rc pretty town as Rc town telled before even arguing with bluey. Also I don't really see her/his actions as scummy I already have argued this with blue.
What is the town tell?
Not saying this is a tell I keep close and it works like 80% of the time. Plus if I said it I would have change my scum game in future games.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 154, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 151, Garmr wrote:
Not saying this is a tell I keep close and it works like 80% of the time. Plus if I said it I would have change my scum game in future games.
I don't like this.
I have listed other reason why i think the slots town you can have those but I'm not giving up that town tell.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 156, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Your other reasons being RC put *effort* into game?
Is that it?
Radiant showing awareness of her surroundings and not being deterred in what others think. None of your points on radiant are actually good.That stuck up attitude that sneaks through and a strong will radiates town
You say her ego is through the roof when your ego is just as high and even more laughable.
None of what Radiant has said actually indicates scum at all yet radiant gets a lot of flak.
You can see how she would reach her conclusion as town.
Oh and happy birthday pisskop.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 162, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:My ego is high. I'm not going to deny that.
Most people who play this game have a high ego.
RC is not getting a lot of flak. Only I'm attacking her, and Wanderer has voted. That's not a lot of flak.
PEdit - Not at all. It's an early read but I feel good about it.
I'd that more than half the thread so far has been about the subject. So I consider that a lot of flak.
So you say I haven't provided much reasoning why radiant is a town read yet I provided way more reasoning than your really bad wander town read and pretty much debunked most of your points on radiant while you haven't even acknowledged my points on wanderer.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 164, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What you consider reasoning for your town read, I consider null. RC could show awareness of her surroundings and not care what other people think as scum. How do you differentiate between town and scum here?
Wanderer seems cautious to me. The comment you found scummy (about me taking his vote away) I read as genuine frustration, most likely to come from town.
Town can be cautious but why would she of been cautious if she was town. You can tell wanderer only really reacted when she thought Radiant was accusing her of being scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 168, massive wrote:Part of me wants to vote for BBT. He and I have never been the same alignment, so that alone probably makes him scum, and I don't hate the idea of sheeping RC.
But then part of me just wants to stick it out on Garmr. Given the interaction between BBT and RC, given the opportunity to dig in and maybe figure out alignment on either of them, why go for the easy third-party vote on Wanderer? Do you think BBT and RC are both town? Or are you protecting one of them?
Just because I clash with Bbt with my ego and my read on a player doesn't mean I necessarily think his scum his nullish to me. Also I swear you haven't read a thing at all massive I am town reading RC are you saying that i should vote my town reads?
So the question to you massive is why should I vote a town read/null read over a scum read???????-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 179, massive wrote:In post 171, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:That's right. It's strange for you to come out the gate at me though, given you know how I feel about you. This feels different and I'm not sure what to make of it atm. I wish you posted more, it takes me so long to work you out.
I blanket-trusted you based on flavor in our neighborhood in GOTG2 and it didn't pay off. I'm not interested in how you feel about me, not right now anyways. And I think someone has already pointed out that there are plenty of egos / vocal players. I don't think the town needs me to lead them.
Not yet anyways.
In post 172, Garmr wrote:So the question to you massive is why should I vote a town read/null read over a scum read???????
You haven't said how you read BBT so why would I assume this is even true?
In post 45, Garmr wrote:In post 44, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 42, Garmr wrote:
Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.
This is weird because you both attacked and defended my action in the same sentence.
Not really weird since I just disagree with your reasoning.I'm not really to sure your motives behind it at the moment I'm trying to figure out if your thinking on a simple level or being opportunistic.
This implies a null read.
Unsure if you can't read or just reaching for a reason. I kinda expected more out of you massive.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 186, bji wrote:I think we've had a lot of personalities on display so far this game and lots of stuff that will help in later days but little to reveal alignments today. This stood out for me though:
In post 114, RadiantCowbells wrote:Unlynchable is a useless sack insofar but I don't like any of the people who followed me onto it, and given Slandaar's posting so far it's possible his meta has changed over two years.
It seems premature to have such strong opinions about players as to use the "don't like any of the people who followed me onto it" line. It just feels off to me to use that line so early. It's usually a line reserved for reasoning about why you wouldn't join a wagon, not a way to spread uncertainty about players who apparently agree with your lynch choice. Just weird.
Second, the people who "followed' you onto the wagon were me (not sure why you don't like me?) and more interestingly, Garmr. Garmr has agreed with you on almost everything: he questioned Unlynchable's reasoning for wanting to policy lynch Slandaar like you did, he did some soft defence of you in post 36 and 40, and he's been at odds with BBT just as much as you have.
I see zero reason for you to have made that statement about the wagon you "started" (in as much as an RVS vote can be considered to start anything).
Finally, at this point Slandaar had made a single post, with a smiley face and nothing else. The choice of words "Slandarr's posting so far" is strange, it would seem more accurate to say "Slandaar's lack of posting so far". Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but this sort of thing tends to be a red flag to me that RadiantCowBells may have had communication with Slandaar outside of the game thread, or alternately, knows
Also, post 34, Garmr asks you how to address you with a gender appropriate pronoun, when later he is so unaware of Wanderer's gender that he calls her a him repeatedly. That's incongruous. Why so interested in your gender when apparently gender awareness is not otherwise an issue that he pays attention to?
Not sure when Garmr is going to be starting V/LA so not sure if he's going to be able to respond to any of this, unfortunately.
Also, for what it's worth, RadiantCowBell changed her "decent chance that my vote doesn't change today" vote already, as expected. Still don't understand what the point of that statement was.
Because I couldn't see radiant cowbells gender and the people on this site who don't use he or she get really snarky if you use the wrong gender pronoun. Kinda surprised wanderer didn't cut off my for a honest mistake (her avi reminds me of privates skype avatar.)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 281, bji wrote:In post 280, Garmr wrote:
Because I couldn't see radiant cowbells gender and the people on this site who don't use he or she get really snarky if you use the wrong gender pronoun. Kinda surprised wanderer didn't cut off my for a honest mistake (her avi reminds me of privates skype avatar.)
A reasonable explanation. Do you agree with the rest of the post where I point out how strange it is for RC to be disliking you for being on her wagon?
People say it all the time so not that strange. I would like some reasoning through.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 282, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 280, Garmr wrote:(quote in quote removed)
Because I couldn't see radiant cowbells gender and the people on this site who don't use he or she get really snarky if you use the wrong gender pronoun. Kinda surprised wanderer didn't cut off my for a honest mistake (her avi reminds me of privates skype avatar.)
I don't follow 'cut off my' so I don't understand what you meant there.
(You have your privates on skype?)
Cut off my balls.
(Maybe i do but it cost 40 bucks a hour jokes jokes. Private is a scummer that's male and has a cat pic that looks like your profile pic)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 766, evilpacman18 wrote:Low hanging fruit.
Bji: ok. About Scripten's congruency, it was weird that he had a high level of certainty on BBT when his content at the time was on something Scripten viewed as "completely irrelevant." If anything, Scripten should have read BBT as scum for wasting time forcing an RC vote on something irrelevant.
Are you saying bji is low hanging fruit?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Bji your looking a bit sweaty there and I don't see the point in holding it in as I could be killed any night.
In post 813, bji wrote:Another problem with this guessing idea is that unless you refuse to reveal until every single player makes their guesses, then scum could easily just not participate. If you really want guesses, then I suggest you don't reveal until everyone has guessed.
Then it is easy to see who is hesitant problem solved. Besides I wasn't going to reveal till everyone guessed captain obvious-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 820, PeaceBringer wrote:lol, seriously? 1 guilty and a claim... :rollseyes:
You know me peacebringer. I always crave more information and I find this the most effective way.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 834, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not sure what Garmr is expecting to achieve with his guessing game.
Can you tell us who we should be voting please?
If you can't see what I'm trying to achieve with who they think I caught then maybe mafia isn't the game for you?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 837, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:For a start, if it's a fake claim you can set it up pretty well with seeing where everyone else stands first.
Secondly, you're relying on what exactly? Because pretty much everything that anyone says in your guessing game will boil down to WIFOM.
You know you can fuck yourself
Here people is someone who was unwilling to provide any information and should be lynched because he was scared to answer something in case he outs a scumbuddy.
(no it's not blue toffee I inspected)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 839, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Nice.
Please tell me how it would be even remotely possible for someone to out a scum buddy.
Please. I'm dying to hear it.
Oh fuck sake your new names blue waffle for just how much of a annoying fuck you are. Just humor me who do you think is scum I caught even through your not smart enough to get the general gist of it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I know I'm town and that's why when you flip scum I'm getting shot tonight.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I knew it I knew massive was actually a freaking mafia.
Also may as well defend myself.
What would be the point of faking day cop as scum when I was under the radar due to my vla and was being town read by quite a few people the day before. If i was mafia I would of had the means to kill wanderer in the night phase.
My town motivation for faking day cop was because I believed in my heart that she was scum as you could tell from day 1 that she was my strongest scum read.
If you ask do I regret my action? Nope not all I believe some positive came out of it. I believe some of the reactions people had slipped knowing wanderer was town before I did my fake scum read.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 904, Scripten wrote:You know what? If you're actually fucking town Garmr, I'm not going to put this game on my wiki, because I've never seen a game with more anti-town bullshit as this.
How about you spend the day telling us who your scumbuddies are, instead, since I really really doubt that post.
Also if you haven't seen a game with more anti town bs you haven't played much mafia. I seen fake cop reads the day before mylo and those ended up losing the game. If you want to argue I will have fun with that I like arguing when it isn't about personal stuff. But if you actually think I'm scum because of my behavior that's fine but if you think I'm scum because I have done a gambit (just not as big as this one) then you got another thing coming.
I don't feel comfortable doing a gambit like this as scum unless I had some insurance I wouldn't get lynched. (I don't)
peedit
Also scriptian if my game is absolute shit Tell me who hanged the TOWN DOCTOR also where was your right scum read (I had massive as scum)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I'm going to chuck two scum reads out there and I feel I'm right about these two
In post 817, Scripten wrote:
In post 809, Garmr wrote:I'm a officer of the law and one of you is under arrest.
(cop guilty)
Take a couple of guesses who's guilty
I'm guessing massive? He'd be the first out of your list of scumspects I'd check out.
All:From my experience, claiming immediately with a cop guilty is good play. I held off on claiming a guilty one game (my first) and lost it for the town. Granted, I got my guilty right before LyLo, but still...
Funny how massive flipped scum last night. A normal person would jump straight to wanderer as I had been pushing her all day and no one else would of voted her. This makes me think massive was your scum buddy as
In post 67, Scripten wrote:Hm. BBT is like 80-90% likely town this game. Garmr miiiight be town, but I don't have enough experience with him to read him clearly. Haven't seen anything else particularly notable. Radiant's "vote parking" thing is at best irrelevant to me right now.
Massive:Why do you seem to be trying to bring us back into RVS with 60?
In post 70, Scripten wrote:
In post 69, massive wrote:In post 67, Scripten wrote:
Massive:Why do you seem to be trying to bring us back into RVS with 60?
Look, I'm allowed my RVS vote, and I sincerely doubt I'm going to drag anyone back into RVS with me. Or are you feeling kinda random again now? Considering that's your second post in the game, do you consideryourselfout of RVS?
I'm certainly not going to tell you how to play the game, but I was surprised to see you doing RVS and also commenting on the game state. It seemed incongruous.
These two post together feel like your trying to coach massive here. what do you mean these two post aren't enough to prove coaching oh ok have another
In post 317, Scripten wrote:This game is really hard to get into. It's like this smelly porridge of vendettas and policy lynches.
Massive:Since Garmr is on V/LA, do you think you'll be using that time to hunt scum elsewhere? After all, you can't really get any more information out of him until he comes back.
Also if you were really angry at me I feel you would of said more choice words in your posts towards me I even tried to stir you up more. Seems fake as fuck
VOTE: Scriptian-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 910, Scripten wrote:I do love how you're pushing scumhunting as "coaching." That one's interesting. Still pretty shit, but interesting.
Don't get how it's shit if you can't deny it I caught you lol.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 909, Scripten wrote:
In post 907, Garmr wrote:
Also scriptian if my game is absolute shit Tell me who hanged the TOWN DOCTOR also where was your right scum read (I had massive as scum)
Wow, it's almost as if you know the alignments of other players or something! Also, pretty sure that I was talking about Pisskop's self-lynch being anti-town.
P-Edit: I really don't see how I should need to interact with you, but thanks for helping show I'm town. Am I next on the list of NKs?
The only thing that needs pointing out is I don't know the alignments of players otherwise I would of known wanderer was town. Also Massive is pretty easy to read as scum as he was completely different from his town self in frog mafia.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 913, PeaceBringer wrote:question is, is scripten putting out fake rage?
What do you think of my point showing where scriptian was trying to coach massive.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread