In post 981, Formerfish wrote:I kinda agree with Fitz because the whole idea of Rando being town is predicated upon the idea that scum have a role blocker or some sort of protective role saved Viking. I am discounting the protect on Viking because why would anyone save him? So that leaves a rb or a lying Rando. If Rando was playing the game and helping us find scum in anyway shape or form then this would probably be a different discussion. However he's not. Barring scum slipping in some catastrophic way and outing themselves I think that Rando would be a good lynch for information and to save us from ourselves later in the game.
Think about it. Rando comes to lylo with us and we are stuck in the same situation with him. If there is a rb do you think he's going to allow Rando to get a shot off, and that is taking into account that Rando has any shots left. If Rando is lying then we are right back where we started.
You keep calling this a policy lynch when its really not.
Would you consider lynching one of two people who've claimed the same role as a policy lynch? No, you would not.
I agree that, if random is town, he was role blocked last night. However, I disagree that we should lynch random for information. It is day 3, one day before LyLo, we should NOT be information lynching right now. We need to be lynching the player that is most likely to flip scum.
Correct, if there is a role blocker, then random will not get a shot through tonight and he never would. That's not a reason to lynch him though. A role blocked shot is not a liability, it's just a lost benefit.
I have read this post several times and, I'm trying to understand, but I can't - what is the relevance of the bolded? Nobody cc'd vigilante.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr
