In post 262, Skold wrote:Because Juls is scum.
Going to be honest I don't think that answer makes no sense whatsoever.
Then you don't understand mafia.
In post 262, Skold wrote:Because Juls is scum.
Going to be honest I don't think that answer makes no sense whatsoever.
In post 276, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Then you don't understand mafia.
In post 279, Albert B. Rampage wrote:BBT could also be scum.
I saw your question when you posted it the first time and I'm choosing not to answer it. We both know you're asking me things about clusk to skate around the point that you noticed his strange question earlier and didn't push it and I'm not interested in letting you do that.In post 273, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What have you liked about what Clusk has posted Scarab?
In post 271, Scarab wrote:"Wow, SNOT is angry. Scarab is kind of a dick. SNOT must be town because there's no scum reason to not want to be called SNOT."
In post 280, Skold wrote:ABR has shown no real reason for his vote on Juls. That doesn't sit right.
VOTE: Albert B. Rampage
pedit: Yes he could. Any particular reason for him to be scum?
Okay, that makes a ton more sense. When you started talking about how my "genuine" emotion had no "scum strategy" I was like wtf of course it didn't why would you be looking for that?? (My use of "scum reason" there was a misquote, but I did know you said "scum strategy", my bad.) Garmr almost certainly died from being bodyguard though because I highly doubt scum would kill the guy who hammered the day 1 lynch stupidly early into the day....unless he gave off some sort of PR tell, I guess? I dunno, even then I'm not sure they would and I'm not going to try to look for that because I suck at it.In post 284, Zoronos wrote:In post 271, Scarab wrote:"Wow, SNOT is angry. Scarab is kind of a dick. SNOT must be town because there's no scum reason to not want to be called SNOT."
That's not why I think you're town. That's pretty strawman, frankly. I didn't say 'scum reasons', I said 'scum strategy'. There's a difference.
You're likely town because killing the dude (thus confirming his alignment) who called you scum and that you got into a fight with (without responding to his allegation), and then posting that you were glad he's dead is not good scum strategy. It's completely unnecessary attention, especially reveling in the death of a PR (normally I see scum just ignore it or ham up 'oh that's terrible that they're dead'). I would hope I'm not the only person that reread the dead town to see what their perspectives were, and that fight is hard to miss in his ISO.
Unnecessarily painting a bullseye on yourself strikes me as unlikely.
After this terrible response, I'm not even going to consider answering your question. I answered the first one for sake of full honesty, but your new question is just trying to direct the conversation on clusk into irrelevant territory. No. AndIn post 286, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:283 - No, you should answer my question. I suspect you haven't got a good answer and should Clusk flip scum, you should know that you're next to eat rope.
In post 286, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:282 - ABR, you have provided no reasoning for why Juls is scum. I believe Juls to be town, ergo, you're scum.
In post 277, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:ABR could be scum.
In post 278, Skold wrote:In post 276, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Then you don't understand mafia.
I was more saying that it has nothing to do with the question BBT asked.
BRB ISO ABR.