In post 323, Kagami wrote:Alright, I'm going to be very very clear here, which I think I've already done, but somehow that is being lost somewhere.
Here is post 195:
Spoiler: post 195
This post contains 5 "things"
1. It questions muffin's read, specifically his scumread on you
2. It addresses Mac's statement in some dialogue where he called your case rubbish and said to drop it
3. It attacks my agreement with muffin
4. It quotes GiF's sarcasm post and says "this must be sarcasm"
5. It addresses bork's agreement with muffin and his vote on you.
All of these things are directly related to you, such your push on mac or pushes on you from muffin, bork and a perceived push from myself. #4 isn't.
Bork says in the post you quoted that it looks like a post by post review of events, and it's not crazy to include a random post. My response was that it isn't really a post by post review, since a lot of posts are skipped in favor of farside-centric ones with the exception of GiF's. I thought that was odd and asked why you included it. That is what happened, are you're free to review my iso if you disagree.
You've also picked up on another thing that happened, which is that GiF interpreted my question as an attack of some sort, and used some pretty attack-y language to describe it. Sakura also apparently found my question distasteful, and now Grapes believes it's poor etiquette and vote-worthy, despite him scumreading you.
Now, what I asked you before was a real question. I've answered yours, so I'd appreciate if you answered mine.
You addressed a specific question at zmuffinman:In post 302, farside22 wrote:...
While I'm asking questions: What do you think of Kag being weirded out that I didn't have my post in order but said nothing about your long read that had a post out of order?
Firstly, you must believe this is something worth asking, and you've asked this as someone who is voting me. If you believe I'm scum, then you're asking muffin about a behavior that you find compellingly scummy. I find it very hard to believe that this is the case, thus I asked if there's anything more you should be asking. The answer I would expect is that you've poured over my iso trying to discern my alignment, and found other things that you believe are suspect which are also worth inquiring into.
That isn't the answer, and instead of something concrete, there's just blustering confusion that I find more than a little annoying. So I ask more directly: Does the question you've asked muffin represent much of the reasoning behind your scumread on me?
p-edit: lulz
First your lucky I'm on the computer to do this. It's harder on the phone to pull up stuff then you can imagine.
this is page 6
I see nothing of value on this page. Most of it is fluff and votes flying by here and there.
here is where you see I last left off
From post 174 - my post which is 20 post I replied to what was mostly about me in there because there was something directed to me that I found pretty fluff-tack-u-lar
The only post I really missed in all that was from Guy which I responded to later
To say your post struck me as scummy would be yes.
It came off as thinking you were testing water to see if others would buy it rather then something that was worth a damn.
The only other subject I see in the thread lately was about set up spec, which I find worthless right now.
Finally muffin is not voting you currently.
