NY 184: a help (done)

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:44 pm

In post 770, RadiantCowbells wrote:Jake you really don't deserve this win at all.

It looks like town is going to win and that means I'm right about 2 scum, I'm pretty sure that means I absolutely deserve the win. IMO this reads as butt hurt scum

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:45 pm

In post 771, MattP wrote:
In post 770, RadiantCowbells wrote:Jake you really don't deserve this win at all.

town this game is literally so retarded I feel like I'm playing town of salem.

Don't use the r-word in that manner. Thank you!

Also.please don't use the word retarded. Its offensive

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:47 pm

In post 774, Oversoul wrote:So, I think Elyse has the worst vote of the last 5 votes.

What is everyone's read on her?

Hmmm.

Tempted by the Matt vote...

1. Null on elyse

2. Have you ever heard of distancing?

It can be an effective strategy.

Sheeping your scum buddy is a bad strategy

Oversoul · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:47 pm

In post 777, Jake from State Farm wrote:2. Have you ever heard of distancing?

It can be an effective strategy.

Sheeping your scum buddy is a bad strategy

What is this even addressing in my post?

pisskop · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:48 pm

Ely vote is notable vote. I'm not sold on her one way or another however.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:49 pm

Its addressing you contemplating sheeping your scum buddy. I was giving you some solid advice to help you in future games

MattP · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:50 pm

In post 772, Oversoul wrote:

In post 753, MattP wrote:Then you say that your vote on RC is doing nothing so you cater to joining on the easy lynch (which is hilarious, because basically that means RC wagon was haaaarrrd so you'll switch to the wagon you called easy, so you're a hypocrite at best)

RC wagon? I am confused. I was talking about the wagon that RC was trying to start on EPM.

Regardless of what your pronoun was directed at (we can all see I suck with pronouns), it doesn't change the point that you were suddenly willing to switch to the "easy" wagon from whatever wagon you were on because that wagon was "doing nothing" (aka a hard wagon)

In post 772, Oversoul wrote:

In post 753, MattP wrote:Then you say my push was bad? So what did you see in my push that made you cater to a Flubber vote in the first place?

The fact that MattP was pushing it and I consider you a really good player? And that Flubber doesn't really look like he will contribute to the game but discussion for another time I guess, lol.
Maybe I'm just holding you to higher standards back when we actively played. pastMatt I don't think would make this type of case/push Flubber like this. After I had seen things start to develop the wagon just felt bad on a visceral level and I determined it had to do with you pushing it for not the best reasons.

You still haven't answered what you saw in the Flubber wagon that made you cater to it at that moment.

And I already said my opening this game sucked. I had a big sloppy misunderstanding with a pronoun, but my logic based on that misunderstanding was completely sound, so I don't get why you keep harping on saying that you're "disappointed" with my play or "expected more from me". But this is also just AtE and is completely irrelevant to what I'm getting at

Oversoul · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:50 pm

In post 780, Jake from State Farm wrote:Its addressing you contemplating sheeping your scum buddy. I was giving you some solid advice to help you in future games

Ah. Ok. So it was a failed attempt at snarky humor.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:51 pm

It wasn't even humor. I'm being nice and giving you a very solid piece of advice

Elyse · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:51 pm

In post 774, Oversoul wrote:So, I think Elyse has the worst vote of the last 5 votes.

What is everyone's read on her?

Hmmm.

Tempted by the Matt vote...

Idc about you not liking my vote, but asking everyone's read on me before committing one to yourself is pinging my scumdar big time.

Oversoul · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:55 pm

In post 783, Jake from State Farm wrote:It wasn't even humor. I'm being nice and giving you a very solid piece of advice

Doing things that scum shouldn't do, or normally don't do, is generally my go to scum playstyle.

MattP · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:57 pm

Yeah, Elyse literally just posted a vote with no content attached to it to read into. I don't get how you read it being so terrible.- or you just dislike her having you as a scumread? But so many people are scumreading you rn

MattP · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:58 pm

Like, I'm curious to know what about her vote read as terrible to you

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 2:59 pm

In post 787, MattP wrote:Like, I'm curious to know what about her vote read as terrible to you

Me too

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:12 pm

Matt, this wouldn't be the first time os contradicted himself. When he finallyndoes his 180 on pk, he gives a completely different reason for why he was scum reading him. Interesting point, his 180 on pk comes the very next post after pk calls os town.

@pk - why did you let OS get way with not answering your earlier questions to him? I saw at least 2 direct questions to him that he never answered, I'm curious why you let that slide and how were you able to town read him without him answering those questions.

pisskop · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:19 pm

which two?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:33 pm

I'm done with this game.

I'll hammer Jake or EPM if they get voted up. Prod dodging until that happens.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:34 pm

you know what nevermind, when looking for them again on my computer so I could quote them, he does eventually answer them. my bad

pisskop · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:35 pm

okay. NBD

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:38 pm

In post 791, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm done with this game.

I'll hammer Jake or EPM if they get voted up. Prod dodging until that happens.

regardless of your alignment this imo is playing against win condition.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:41 pm

so is voting town

oh wait it's not against yours.

Oversoul · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:45 pm

In post 781, MattP wrote:You still haven't answered what you saw in the Flubber wagon that made you cater to it at that moment.

And I already said my opening this game sucked. I had a big sloppy misunderstanding with a pronoun, but my logic based on that misunderstanding was completely sound, so I don't get why you keep harping on saying that you're "disappointed" with my play or "expected more from me". But this is also just AtE and is completely irrelevant to what I'm getting at

1. Read thread
2. MattP posted
2.2 Get excited
2.3 MattP advocating lynch on Flubber
3. Look over Flubber iso
4. See nothing really there
5. MattP is good player so his push is probably good

pisskop · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:46 pm

In post 796, Oversoul wrote:MattP is good player so his push is probably good

GROAN

pisskop · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:47 pm

That is bad. I don't think you're a bad player, but that is bad.

Oh hey, I just demonstrated why I groaned.

Oversoul · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Tue May 19, 2015 3:48 pm

In post 786, MattP wrote:Yeah, Elyse literally just posted a vote with no content attached to it to read into. I don't get how you read it being so terrible.- or you just dislike her having you as a scumread? But so many people are scumreading you rn

It came out of nowhere because she was townreading me