Star Trek Deep Space Nine Season 1 Mafia(game over!)

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:55 am

In post 524, LicketyQuickety wrote:My intuition is telling me that CDB, HI and senator are linked with something. Don't know if it has to do with this particular game or not.

There're all acting scummy as shit and I don't like it... at all.

pisskop · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:57 am

Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Senator · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:59 am

In post 526, pisskop wrote:Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Well blow me down. This is what I get for checking on my phone

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 3:05 am

In post 526, pisskop wrote:Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Well.... that is humbling. I can't say I've seen any body come out of the blue earth and say something like that.

Marcrell · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 3:17 am

In post 476, millar13 wrote:do we get to use the force?

In post 74, millar13 wrote:which one of you is Chewbacca?

This consists of millar's entire posting history.

Nearly 400 posts apart and this is all he has to say.

VOTE: millar13 I totally see where this is coming from.

Senator wrote:
In post 526, pisskop wrote:Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Well blow me down. This is what I get for checking on my phone

Oh. Hey pisskop!

LicketyQuickety wrote:My intuition is telling me that CDB, HI and senator are linked with something. Don't know if it has to do with this particular game or not.

So you're... psychic?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 3:23 am

In post 529, Marcrell wrote:
In post 476, millar13 wrote:do we get to use the force?

In post 74, millar13 wrote:which one of you is Chewbacca?

This consists of millar's entire posting history.

Nearly 400 posts apart and this is all he has to say.

VOTE: millar13 I totally see where this is coming from.

Senator wrote:
In post 526, pisskop wrote:Youre bad at mafia. I was HIs scumbuddy last game

Well blow me down. This is what I get for checking on my phone

Oh. Hey pisskop!

LicketyQuickety wrote:My intuition is telling me that CDB, HI and senator are linked with something. Don't know if it has to do with this particular game or not.

So you're... psychic?

Hell no! Just not even! I play by my gut that should be the most obvious thing at this point! If I am bad at mafia I will learn this shit and perfect my play till no one is going to know how in gods name to read me!

PeaceBringer · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 4:35 am

In post 481, Nero Cain wrote:Well, ever since I guessed Tals name he's been rather quiet, and PB has as well

huh? I think you may have thrown something my way. I haven't had anything that has got me worked up to engage yet this game...certainly understand any suspicion my having engaged less would bring

PeaceBringer · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 4:37 am

vote millar

davesaz · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 6:27 am

I like the observation about RIP well enough to vote there. Millar looks like a good vote too, but can wait.

VOTE: RIP

zabing12 · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 6:30 am

It's a pretty good argument:

VOTE: RIP

Jamierus · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 7:17 am

I'm going to keep my vote on Sinsun but I have no issue with the RIP wagon and am considering switching onto it.

LQ why in heavens name would you claim? Anyway, part of me wants to lynch LQ. What if scum keeps him alive until the end game and gets 2 kills in? That's worrisome. You never should have claimed.

Zabing looks extra scummy to me after his vote on RIP. "It's a pretty good argument" yeah Zabing you haven't exactly been the poster child of contribution here, you barely said anything until pressured. I'm not trusting this vote at all and if RIP comes up town I'll be looking at you.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 12:53 pm

In post 535, Jamierus wrote:I'm going to keep my vote on Sinsun but I have no issue with the RIP wagon and am considering switching onto it.

LQ why in heavens name would you claim? Anyway, part of me wants to lynch LQ. What if scum keeps him alive until the end game and gets 2 kills in? That's worrisome. You never should have claimed.

Zabing looks extra scummy to me after his vote on RIP. "It's a pretty good argument" yeah Zabing you haven't exactly been the poster child of contribution here, you barely said anything until pressured. I'm not trusting this vote at all and if RIP comes up town I'll be looking at you.

If you don't know what your role is, I suggest you look at it pronto.

pisskop · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 12:54 pm

In post 125, zabing12 wrote:The other party doesn't have to be active for you to tunnel.

VOTE: davesaz

Hi I was making a document so that my first Large theme might be easier.

WTF is this weaksauce reason to vote?

Senator · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 12:55 pm

In post 537, pisskop wrote:
In post 125, zabing12 wrote:The other party doesn't have to be active for you to tunnel.

VOTE: davesaz

Hi I was making a document so that my first Large theme might be easier.

WTF is this weaksauce reason to vote?

aww piss. Look at you being where you don't belong.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:14 pm

In post 537, pisskop wrote:
In post 125, zabing12 wrote:The other party doesn't have to be active for you to tunnel.

VOTE: davesaz

Hi I was making a document so that my first Large theme might be easier.

WTF is this weaksauce reason to vote?

Who are you a replacement for?

Senator · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:15 pm

Nobody.

Senator · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:15 pm

That's my sock yo.

MaxwellPuckett · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:46 pm

Lmao that's zabings second 'sure that argument looks good, let's vote him' vote. I'm feeling great about where my vote is ATM.

Also, LQ, I really think you misunderstood the setup thread. Nero did not say that 'single votes will not show up', he said: if any player has a vote count other than one, (for example, double-voter or non-voter), that will be reflected. The 'example' part should have tipped you off that he is referring to how many votes a player is able to give. If someone has double votes, it will show up in the count, for example.

Every vote cast will be reflected, is what he is saying. I'm kind of amazed you thought he meant differently.. Why did you not question that the mod was apparently not recording all of the votes?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:53 pm

In post 542, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Lmao that's zabings second 'sure that argument looks good, let's vote him' vote. I'm feeling great about where my vote is ATM.

Also, LQ, I really think you misunderstood the setup thread. Nero did not say that 'single votes will not show up', he said: if any player has a vote count other than one, (for example, double-voter or non-voter), that will be reflected. The 'example' part should have tipped you off that he is referring to how many votes a player is able to give. If someone has double votes, it will show up in the count, for example.

Every vote cast will be reflected, is what he is saying. I'm kind of amazed you thought he meant differently.. Why did you not question that the mod was apparently not recording all of the votes?

Nero didn't say that.

I'm not assuming much about this set up at this point cuz its just too unfamiliar from what I'm use to.

The thought did go through my head that the mod is "behind" in stuff.

Saint · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:03 pm

ive been scum with millar and he flails
i dont see flailing
not voting millar13

Saint · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:04 pm

unvote
vote: hostileintent

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:04 pm

Pisskop is referencing a PM between myself and them about a set up I have made. I was very clear it was a trimmed game and very complex and I asked if they could take a look at it and they seemed flabbergasted that the game was so complex and said it was way out of their experience to try and balance.

Saint · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:04 pm

HI has been making votes with masked reasoning so im voting her for voting without any justification behind it
thats my justification

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:05 pm

P-edited twice BTW.

make that 3 times.

Senator · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Sun May 24, 2015 2:07 pm

In post 546, LicketyQuickety wrote:Pisskop is referencing a PM between myself and them about a set up I have made. I was very clear it was a trimmed game and very complex and I asked if they could take a look at it and they seemed flabbergasted that the game was so complex and said it was way out of their experience to try and balance.

pisskop is making a excel document tracking notable events and posts; as well as his feels and people's read, so that he can crush you with his mighty might.