If anyone here is V/LA, or you know a player is V/LA, please post it here or PM killerjester/peregrinev/wake.
Updating VCs to include unspoilered V/LAs.
In post 2424, DeltaWave wrote:I still think we should PL laladucks. I'm happy with that outcome. There is lots of noise in this game that really isn't productive. The reality is that we need to stop town-on-town vanity fights like Drixx v. House and focus on the shit that needs to get done.
In post 2429, DeltaWave wrote:I don't think lala is trolling. I'll vote later, I don't want to end the day too fast.
In post 2422, Skybird wrote:Wolf, I also had some earlier concerns about kitz at the begining of the game. (reference posts: 128, 133, 159) I voted her in post 278.
In post 2433, Kitz wrote:In post 2422, Skybird wrote:Wolf, I also had some earlier concerns about kitz at the begining of the game. (reference posts: 128, 133, 159) I voted her in post 278.
I asked in #49 what 14:3:3:1 was, you said in #128 "This makes me go hmm, how many games have you played?"
In 133, you say I could be a scum trying to drop a fake towntell.
#159 you quoted #32 (Hope we don't get mindfucked by setup) and #39 being the 14:3:3:1 question.
#32 is a referrence to the setup I was playing in, which included a really fucked up series of days, confusion, too many PR, a mass murderer, gamethrowing players and other stuff.
Since many here was in that game.
#278 is a vote on me about setup posts and the response to the questions and my use of the emoticon.
There's also my casual answer to a question. I can answer that regardless of what role and stuff I am.
Okay, serious questions.
How the fuck is a question a "fake towntell"? What makes it a towntell in any circumstance? This is a bullshit reason, it's neither towny nor scummy. Even confused scum can ask this question. I was genuine confused when I read 14:3:3:1, the numbers didn't add as I thought the limit was 20 players, and I didn't know of multiball let alone adding a 3P in the mix, not reading the setup correctly regarding that it's multiball and some lines were in the wrong places in my point of view after a re-read.
How is the use of an emoticon an attempt to discourage questions and conversation? Like, what. I don't see the connection.
In fact, most post with that emoticon was related to the 180-Game. Can't you even make the connections to that? I was not talking about the setup of this game in any detail other than "I hope it isn't as mindfucking as 180". If I'm getting you right, then you're basically saying I'm subtly trying to discourage the discussion of a game not related to this one.
Logically, shouldn't rolling eyes mean Sarcastic / Ironic? Sure, it makes small sense in some posts, but fuck it.
The odd targeting is the main reason why it pings, as it seems like an attempt to "get lowhanging fruit". I realise I didn't write that, but it was pretty obvious on an earlier response.
And a free clarification, I didn't say the two of you had a same mindset. #bad_at_english
In post 2434, Skybird wrote:you are implying that you think the questions being asked are bad
In post 2434, Skybird wrote:If you were genuinely confused why did you not say that in post 138 in your reponse?
In post 138, Kitz wrote:I'm a nawb with my head in the clouds sometimes.
In post 2434, Skybird wrote:Are you simply trying to say that lala is playing carefree and I am playing careful?
In post 2434, Skybird wrote:Dude, you did not mention 180 in your post 32. You are also not supposed to talk about on-going games so I'd be very cautious about making references to other games.
In post 160, Kitz wrote:180 was a freaking nightmare, quite a lot of players here was in it so a subtle reference.
Asked you this before.Drixx wrote:I probably overreacted to that string of posts. I read them all in a close time proximity and I already have tried to bury the hatchet a couple times. I think it only flared up again because House thought I made the joke and then tried to profit from the resulting drama. He, essentially, was angrily scumreading me for precisely the same reason I was scum reading him. That actually makes me feel way better about him as far as being town goes.
Have you ever lost your temper at people pushing you before as town?Bookitty wrote:Meh, I've been avoiding this game because I kind of lost my temper at Silverwolf and Cheetory.
In post 2440, Cheetory6 wrote:Kitz.
Why are you overdefensive this game, where last game you were literally willing to selfvote yourself because you figured you would be a distraction?
In post 2443, Cheetory6 wrote:Also, have you ever faked being angry as scum to try and disarm momentum on a wagon on you?
I'm just saying that the tone and manner in which you're responding to things feels different than it does here, would you agree? What about this game is different specifically that's warranting the difference?Kitz wrote:I'm actually arguing, and responding.
Beside, if I didn't respond, what then?
As for distraction, well, it's based on how that game went.
Can you link a specific quote/post? I don't have much time right now. On my way out the door in a second.Kitz wrote:While you're here Cheetory, what's your thought about my argument of Trolling VS Anti-Game?
I think the point is more that the way your read developed on her is weird in a way that doesn't necessarily make as much sense to me as coming from town.Boo wrote:My interactions with Titus were weird -- so... what's the point? She didn't flip as groupscum, so what does my believing in her as town at first have to do with the price of tea in China?
Is this the point that I admitted I was wrong about? Or is it something that Silver has been saying?Boo wrote:Varsoon tried to buddy me, so clearly he is my buddy -- um, what? How does THAT work, again?
In post 2447, Cheetory6 wrote:What about this game is different specifically that's warranting the difference?
In post 2447, Cheetory6 wrote:Can you link a specific quote/post? I don't have much time right now. On my way out the door in a second.
In post 2433, Kitz wrote:Reason I vote Prolapse is because he just isn't doing anything. Even trolling is acceptable to some degree compared to being anti-game while being around. What has an anti-game to benefit? I can't think of anything other than to be a waste of space and a block. Would you want this player to have the same behavior to the end of the game?
Radiant is currently being a troll, and even took my obvious "he's already dead" bait into trolling. It's bad, yes, but there could be a reason, like a role that benefits mass attention at night or benefit from being lynched. Behavior could change, and it could be related to WIFOM.
I hope you see the pro-con thingie that's in my head regarding the situations.