Star Trek Deep Space Nine Season 1 Mafia(game over!)

RIP · Post Post #1825 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:54 am

VOTE: CBD

I don't get the votes on me

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #1826 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:03 am

Vote Count 3.06 - Up to post 1825

ChannelDelibird(8) - displaced, PerigrineV, Narninian, davesaz, Titus, Senator, Thor665, RIP

[L-1]

RIP(4) - KlingonCelt, Peacebringer, ChannelDelibird, Nero Cain
Thor665(1) - Sinsun1
Not Voting(4) - ArcAngel9, Zabing12, Jemierus, LittleGumball
Mod Note: LittleGumball is VLA. ArcAngel9 is VLA. Zabing12 is being replaced. Jamierus has been prodded.

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch

Day ends Thursday, June 18th, 8:45 PM USA Mountain Time or when a lynch occurs

[/area]

Titus · Post Post #1827 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:12 am

In post 1823, ChannelDelibird wrote:Yes, vote me to 'compromise' with five days before deadline just after I catch up and get fully engaged again. That doesn't look like a calculated attempt to off me before I say something sensible at all.

Well if you're caught up, you can say something sensible.

Thor665 · Post Post #1828 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:22 am

The RIP wagon should probably also expand on their reasons for voting him and (though it will freak Sim out) advocate for people to move votes there.

@Klingon
@Nero

As the two least scummy votes on there, methinks this duty falls to you, as I expect nothing much from your co-voters (they may feel free to prove me wrong, however, I like surprises)

I would also love to see someone offer up a hammer intent on CDB so we have some time to assess it prior to deadline. Let's see, we have 4 lurksacks who are not voting - no help.

@Simsun - what's your read on CDB (and, for that matter, RIP)? Your Jamierus wagon is actually sadder than the vote on me, because at least you kind of had a unique-ish reason to push me. I am pretty sure Jamierus is being pushed for lurk, which is hardly a shocking and new thing in this thread (As even you outlined in your case on me) Also, as you may have noticed, you have zero support. You should at least offer views on the top wagons, even if you're unwilling to offer hammer intent. Please and thank you.

Thor665 · Post Post #1829 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:24 am

In post 1827, Titus wrote:
In post 1823, ChannelDelibird wrote:Yes, vote me to 'compromise' with five days before deadline just after I catch up and get fully engaged again. That doesn't look like a calculated attempt to off me before I say something sensible at all.

Well if you're caught up, you can say something sensible.

I kind of agreed with this on first read, but on second read, not so much.
I'll agree he's not saying anything groundbreaking or sheep-worthy...but I don't really think he's saying stuff that lacks sense and he does seem to at least be offering a few reads.
Am I missing something?

Nero Cain · Post Post #1830 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:02 am

it felt important to me to put some more pressure on RIP. Also his CDB vote suxs.

sure

INTENT TO HAMMER

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #1831 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:06 am

Yup. #1827 is just wrong.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1832 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:11 am

Who is the scum sitting on you, CBD?

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #1833 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:24 am

RIP, as previously stated. After the last page, maybe Titus. Possibly PV/davesaz based on mild-to-strong townreads elsewhere. Man, it's like I this over the last two pages.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #1834 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:24 am

EBWOP: "like I said this"

Klingoncelt · Post Post #1835 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:47 am

In post 1825, RIP wrote:

VOTE: CBD

I don't get the votes on me

My vote's on you for failing to contribute. Very scummy, that is.

Sinsun1 · Post Post #1836 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:53 pm

UNVOTE: Jamierus (Guess no one thinks his play falls under scum category for now)
VOTE: RIP (Between his play lately and the fact I believe CDB is town more-so than RIP, I'd rather get rid of the scummier player).

pisskop · Post Post #1837 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:46 pm

vote cdb. RIPs always something like this

Senator · Post Post #1838 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:48 pm

In post 1837, pisskop wrote:vote cdb. RIPs always something like this

go metadive

Thor665 · Post Post #1839 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:58 pm

In post 1838, Senator wrote:
In post 1837, pisskop wrote:vote cdb. RIPs always something like this

go metadive

Do you think RIP is townish?
Or are you just defending him from the specific case of "seems to suck for contributions"?

@CDB - you have had a hammer intent posted against you and posted since then without claiming. Was this intentional? I'm fine with you if you'd prefer to not claim prior to being hammered, i just want to make sure that's your goal.

Also - any changes to your last read list? Or is it still solid at this stage?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #1840 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:59 pm

In post 1837, pisskop wrote:vote cdb. RIPs always something like this

Not true.

pisskop · Post Post #1841 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:03 pm

I think RIP is a bad lynch for this game. Weaker case

Thor665 · Post Post #1842 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:11 pm

In post 1841, pisskop wrote:I think RIP is a bad lynch for this game. Weaker case

Is it? I kind of disagree - honestly I find it interesting he won out while my Peacebringer wagon faltered and died with a more active push effort behind it. You don't find that interesting case-wise? I'm marginally tempted to flip him on a pet theory of Peacebringer being the opposite alignment of him. It's not like it would gamble much town scumhunting prowess.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #1843 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:11 pm

In post 1841, pisskop wrote:I think RIP is a bad lynch for this game. Weaker case

Doesn't much matter. Hammer intent's been made against CDB.

Thor665 · Post Post #1844 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:29 pm

Opinions on wagons always matter.

What is yours on CDB at the moment?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #1845 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:55 pm

In post 1844, Thor665 wrote:Opinions on wagons always matter.

What is yours on CDB at the moment?

Like I said before, I had him at leaning Town. But then there's poor dead Maxwell.

Now, did Maxwell really hide behind Scum CDB like he crumbed? Or did he hide behind Saint? I'm inclined to believe he hid behind CDB, but I'm not 100% sure.

It's that missing Vig kill that has me confused.

Titus · Post Post #1846 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:18 pm

In post 1845, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 1844, Thor665 wrote:Opinions on wagons always matter.

What is yours on CDB at the moment?

Like I said before, I had him at leaning Town. But then there's poor dead Maxwell.

Now, did Maxwell really hide behind Scum CDB like he crumbed? Or did he hide behind Saint? I'm inclined to believe he hid behind CDB, but I'm not 100% sure.

It's that missing Vig kill that has me confused.

^eyebrow at the last statement...

PeaceBringer · Post Post #1847 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:29 pm

In post 1842, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1841, pisskop wrote:I think RIP is a bad lynch for this game. Weaker case

Is it? I kind of disagree - honestly I find it interesting he won out while my Peacebringer wagon faltered and died with a more active push effort behind it. You don't find that interesting case-wise? I'm marginally tempted to flip him on a pet theory of Peacebringer being the opposite alignment of him. It's not like it would gamble much town scumhunting prowess.

um, there was never a serious wagon on me, so what are you smoking?
Also saying player x has to opposite of player y is just bad dichotomy.

Thor665 · Post Post #1848 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:32 pm

In post 1845, Klingoncelt wrote:It's that missing Vig kill that has me confused.

What Vig kill were you expecting and what Night was it missing from?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #1849 (ISO) » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:47 pm

In post 1846, Titus wrote:
In post 1845, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 1844, Thor665 wrote:Opinions on wagons always matter.

What is yours on CDB at the moment?

Like I said before, I had him at leaning Town. But then there's poor dead Maxwell.

Now, did Maxwell really hide behind Scum CDB like he crumbed? Or did he hide behind Saint? I'm inclined to believe he hid behind CDB, but I'm not 100% sure.

It's that missing Vig kill that has me confused.

^eyebrow at the last statement...

There was only one kill Nights 1 & 2, assuming that Maxwell hid N1 (and I think he did.) Now assuming that the Mafia made the kills, where are the Vig kills? Surely there's a Vig, maybe a PGO, possibly a 3rd Party in a game this size. Why only 1 kill both Nights? Something doesn't add up here. It's bugging me.