In post 341, sangres wrote:I obviously disagree with the case on GB, but it fits with what I know about town-pie that she'd react the way she did
I think the case on gentlemen was every bit as nonsensical, actually, which is the biggest issue I have with pieguy.
In post 345, pieguyn wrote:except in that game, your reasoning for scum reading me *was* correct. your reasoning was that I wasn't scum hunting, and it was right - I had not pushed anyone at that point in the game.
in this game, GB was pushing me for strategically lurking. which is incorrect - I wasn't posting bc I was busy.
you're saying you'd expect me to react the same way as TH 3. so why would you expect me to acknowledge I was doing something that I wasn't doing?
I expected you to acknowledge that you were posting on site but that you had reasons for not posting here, and not to immediately push back and suggest it was scummy to think you were avoiding the thread because you were actually busy, even though there was no way to possibly know that prior to you explaining it.
The "context" isn't as important as you're making it out to be. This is ignoring the fact that there's a difference between not posting in other games (which may have lots and lots of pages) and not posting in a game that was fresh out of confirmation stage
In post 347, sangres wrote:I think that it was more likely than not that Pieguyn was approaching the game from a town perspective than a scum one when she had the initial reaction she did to Regfan's post
Why? Ignoring anything else you may think is town about pieguy, walk me through what was town about pieguy's approach to Regfan.
-Nati