In post 1644, Angry Frat BROs wrote:In post 1641, Generic wrote:All I seem to be hearing though is if I'm not scum reading people a person agrees with I'm not blcontributing. Which is bullshit.
Well all I recall of you in the last several pages is arguing with Homunsadlfkjrf and then discussing them with Wisdom on loop. But ya.
Do you have a read on Ricastle?
I felt he was buddying to me but have said his motivation unclear. I feel both he and wisdom seemed to have convislction in their claims about the argument with the other, and it was a slapfest more than anything. I am not town reading him but I haven't felt he was acting scummy beyond the buddying.