Mini 1679: Baccano! Mafia - Game Over

[Cheetory6]

Vote Count 2.2

Kalimar

[3] - Big The Cat, Varsoon, notquitethere

West9

[1] - Kalimar

Mainez

[1] - Aristophanes

notquitethere

[1] - West9

No Vote

[4] - Jazzmin, JohnnyFarrar, Mainez, ToastyToast

Day Two will end on June 28, 2015 or in (expired on 2015-06-28 22:00:00)
Prodding West9 and notquitethere has been prodded already.

[Big The Cat]

What do you want me to answer to?

Oh!~ There's talking Bread~

Hi Bread!

What do yooo thinkies about NotQuiteThere?

Where's that guy anyway? D'Oh!


Oh, uh, can uh, can you give a long answer? I like longbreads!~ Can eat more of them! Yum~

~Big

[Varsoon]

I think the best way to move this game forward is if everyone, and I mean everyone, provides a simple reads-list.

[Kalimar]

prod dodge, post later

[Big The Cat]

Alright so, idk if any of you have ever seen my scum theory thingy, but I generally see scum as fitting one of 3 categories. More likely than not, there is one of each.

I disagree with this.

It's also like saying, more likely than not one scum is on the D1 mislynch wagon, and one scum is off. Or things of that nature. It's just a shitty way to scumhunt in my opinion, because you limit your options of who scum could be by assuming they are 1 of each in three pools.

Anyway, reads list in order from scum to town, which may or may not differ from my hydra partner a bit because we're halfway around the world from each other, but we've chatted some.

Scum:

Kalimar
NQT
Hydrangea/West9 slot

Toast
Johnny F
Aristophanes

Mainez
TSQ/Jazzmyn slot
Domino/Varsoon slot

Town:

[Big The Cat]

^^Froggy

[notquitethere]

Hot damn do mafiascum days last long. I'll do a read list when I get back to this a bit later today, but seriously Jazzmin, JohnnyFarrar, Mainez, and ToastyToast should stop wasting everybody's time and cast their votes already.

[Mainez]

Hot damn do mafiascum days last long. I'll do a read list when I get back to this a bit later today, but seriously Jazzmin, JohnnyFarrar, Mainez, and ToastyToast should stop wasting everybody's time and cast their votes already.

what the hell is your problem? what's the rush when there's still 5 days?

[West9]

Augh what the fuck how has it been 48 hours since my last post.

Sorry about this, I'm not usually this absent-minded.

[notquitethere]

What's your problem with making a decision? Mainez? I'm used to 72 hour days, and so weeks of no information and low activity is painfully dull and doesn't help game-engagement. If someone wants to present an argument for why I should switch to a counterwagon then I'm all ears but for now I'd rather see the end of day.

[Kalimar]

vote: notquitethere

[Aristophanes]

What's your problem with making a decision? Mainez? I'm used to 72 hour days, and so weeks of no information and low activity is painfully dull and doesn't help game-engagement. If someone wants to present an argument for why I should switch to a counterwagon then I'm all ears but for now I'd rather see the end of day.

Basically why I seem disengaged for periods, then suddenly here a lot, then disengaged again.
Getting used to the long days on this site still.

Also, on vaca, but will see if I can do some quick posts for ya.
Apologies in advance for typos and shitty formatting.

[Aristophanes]

A few other questions for anyone who happens to be around and knows the answers:

What does e3 mean?
How do you link to individual posts in a responding post?
What does ICYMI mean?

Regards,
Jazz

There is a [post= ] [/post] tag which, if you put the post number into, will link directly.
Ex. In 619 you asked this question.

Or you can click the thing in the top left of the post (yellow if unread, white if read) to bring you to that post then copy the url link that appears In your address bar.
I like the first way better.

[West9]

my latest post before voting CooLDog was the post on my reads and after CooLDoG replied Beer, i had a stronger stance on CooLDoG being scum

Okay then, follow up: What was it about CD's answer to Beer that pushed you over the line? In your vote post, you talk about him saying that "anyone would have asked the questions" you asked, but he also said that that particular point didn't contribute to his read on you.

to put it simply, i felt like he was discrediting me without much reasoning.

But what was it about that specific post? Like, I wasn't asking you to put it simply.

vote: notquitethere

So I guess there really was nothing else to your West suspicion.

Still waiting for NQT to answer my question.

[Aristophanes]

vote: notquitethere

Why?
Bored with West?
Don't find him scummy anymore?
Or do you see something in NQT worth voting for?

I also have noted that you vote people who aren't really around to defend themselves.

Also, why jo real scumhunting from your slot?
I see you saying that others aren't doing it, but I have yet to see much of it from yourself.

[West9]

I think the best way to move this game forward is if everyone, and I mean everyone, provides a simple reads-list.

There's something about this post, combined with Varsoon's recent activity being nothing more than "I don't how this game is going," that really bugs me.

Varsoon, what are your reads?

[West9]

I think the best way to move this game forward is if everyone, and I mean everyone, provides a simple reads-list.

There's something about this post, combined with Varsoon's recent activity being nothing more than "I don't

like

how this game is going," that really bugs me.

Varsoon, what are your reads?

EBWOP

[Kalimar]

vote: notquitethere

Why?
Bored with West?
Don't find him scummy anymore?
Or do you see something in NQT worth voting for?

I also have noted that you vote people who aren't really around to defend themselves.

Also, why jo real scumhunting from your slot?
I see you saying that others aren't doing it, but I have yet to see much of it from yourself.

then vote me.

[Aristophanes]

@West (in regards to 605)
I don't think too many have played with me enough to have proper meta.
This is only my 6th game on this site and my 2nd (maybe third?) with Maniez.
2nd with a couple of people. I agree with this and it is a part of my townread on him as well.

Drank a lot last night, don't even remember posting :C

wanting people to think bullet-proofs are all town.

You'll have to point out where the hell you got this from because my head did a 180 spin when I read it.

Yeah, where the heck did you get this from?
I have seen nothing of the sort from anyone. Please, do get to answering this.

He shut down arguments that were likely to go nowhere and tried to start/push things he thought were better routes.
Trying not to bog down the thread with deadend arguments where nobody will be convinced either way is more town than you give it credit for.

When did this happen? Calling people stupid doesn't mean this ever happened.

326.

[Aristophanes]

vote: notquitethere

Why?
Bored with West?
Don't find him scummy anymore?
Or do you see something in NQT worth voting for?

I also have noted that you vote people who aren't really around to defend themselves.

Also, why jo real scumhunting from your slot?
I see you saying that others aren't doing it, but I have yet to see much of it from yourself.

then vote me.

Care to answer any of the questions first?

[Kalimar]

nqt doesn't care about lynching scum. (compare and contrast 600 and 634. 600 is the scummiest single post of this game Day.)

that's why i voted for him.

[Aristophanes]

Hmm...rereading 600 I see how void of scumhunting it is.
It seems like just getting a lhnch katters more than who it is that is lynched.

I'm gonna reread him and see if that's a consistent thing.

[Kalimar]

actually, nqt, why did you think cooldog-scum would be trying harder than he did? later in that post you go on to say not trying is usually a bad sign.

[Mainez]

What's your problem with making a decision? Mainez? I'm used to 72 hour days, and so weeks of no information and low activity is painfully dull and doesn't help game-engagement. If someone wants to present an argument for why I should switch to a counterwagon then I'm all ears but for now I'd rather see the end of day.

then get used to the longer days! the fact that the activity for this game is rather low is one of the reasons why i can't vote for someone yet. and while i admit that i'm part of the reason why there's low activity, you got to admit that you aren't doing that much either (and pretty much everyone else). but i choose to believe that everyone is trying to contribute because i myself am in a position where i'm trying to deal with real life and this game.

ok with that crap done, i'll see what i can do in the next 15 minutes to help me get a better hold of this game...

[Mainez]

my latest post before voting CooLDog was the post on my reads and after CooLDoG replied Beer, i had a stronger stance on CooLDoG being scum

Okay then, follow up: What was it about CD's answer to Beer that pushed you over the line? In your vote post, you talk about him saying that "anyone would have asked the questions" you asked, but he also said that that particular point didn't contribute to his read on you.

to put it simply, i felt like he was discrediting me without much reasoning.

But what was it about that specific post? Like, I wasn't asking you to put it simply.

actually even if i were to not put it simply, it's still yes he was discrediting me without much reasoning. like saying what i did was useless and fake and something anyone can do. but the actual fact is i was trying and people were not picking out points that i picked.

but hold on a second, where exactly are you trying to go with asking me so much about why i voted for CooLDoG? are you reading me as scum or what? what have my answers told you?

because i'm starting to not see where you're going.

and this thought of mine is making me understand CooLDoG more regarding what Aristophanes said about him shutting down arguments that were leading to no where, which i previously couldn't understand. but like i'm not going to shut you down or something because i'm not that kind of player but yea, where are you trying to go with this?