In post 643, Aristophanes wrote:@West (in regards to 605)
I don't think too many have played with me enough to have proper meta.
This is only my 6th game on this site and my 2nd (maybe third?) with Maniez.
2nd with a couple of people. I agree with this and it is a part of my townread on him as well.
In post 600, notquitethere wrote:
Big
I don't know whether it's just because it's a hydra, but I'm not getting as shady vibes from you than I did Bro. I've got to keep tabs on this as we go though.
In post 620, JohnnyFarrar wrote:E3 is the Electronic Entertainment Expo, (arguably) the biggest video game event of the year.
If you look at the post number on any given post you'll notice it's actually a direct link to that post, so my strategy is copying that link address and then dropping it into a url tag
In post 622, Mainez wrote:ICYMI is in case you missed it.
about the individual posts thing, i'm not sure what you're referring to but if i didn't misunderstand you... at the right hand corner of each post, there's this Q+ thing where you can click and add them to your lists of posts you wanna reply to.
In post 637, Aristophanes wrote:There is a [post= ] [/post] tag which, if you put the post number into, will link directly. Ex. In 619 you asked this question.
In post 623, ToastyToast wrote:I agree that BigCat is way less offputting than BROseidon, but is that really enough to change a scum suspect? They need to have done something to change your mind. Or are you saying that your original read may have been based on your dislike for his style of play?
In post 631, notquitethere wrote:Hot damn do mafiascum days last long. I'll do a read list when I get back to this a bit later today, but seriously Jazzmin, JohnnyFarrar, Mainez, and ToastyToast should stop wasting everybody's time and cast their votes already.
In post 652, Mainez wrote:the person that is absolutely flying under the radar is Jazz, as she (?) has basically posted longggg posts about trying to understand this and that and unable to actually provide her reads on someone. like there's a lot of sitting on the fence in 618.
In post 626, Big The Cat wrote:What do yooo thinkies about NotQuiteThere?
In post 631, notquitethere wrote:Hot damn do mafiascum days last long. I'll do a read list when I get back to this a bit later today, but seriously Jazzmin, JohnnyFarrar, Mainez, and ToastyToast should stop wasting everybody's time and cast their votes already.
In post 629, Big The Cat wrote:In post 530, ToastyToast wrote:Alright so, idk if any of you have ever seen my scum theory thingy, but I generally see scum as fitting one of 3 categories. More likely than not, there is one of each.
I disagree with this.
It's also like saying, more likely than not one scum is on the D1 mislynch wagon, and one scum is off. Or things of that nature. It's just a shitty way to scumhunt in my opinion, because you limit your options of who scum could be by assuming they are 1 of each in three pools.
In post 659, ToastyToast wrote:Well I've already explained my town read on him in D1, but I'll check to see if there is any new content on him. NQT more than anyone tried to address more than just a couple of people, showing to me that he wasn't leaving any stones unturned. I especially liked his push on Domino (granted, him following up with "im in the middle on him" was mehh). We haven't seen much of him Day 2.
This is a bit OMGUSy to me. You posted less than others in D1, got little attention, this is typical scum profile. Enough to lynch someone over? Well, there's been so little movement today and frankly I still know pretty much nothing.In post 645, Kalimar wrote:nqt doesn't care about lynching scum. (compare and contrast 600 and 634. 600 is the scummiest single post of this game Day.)
that's why i voted for him.
I expect scum to play to their wincon and avoid getting lynched. Of course, it's a bad sign when anyone stops caring regardless of wincon.In post 647, Kalimar wrote:actually, nqt, why did you think cooldog-scum would be trying harder than he did? later in that post you go on to say not trying is usually a bad sign.
I didn't like Bro's attack on Aristo over the flavour-request controversy and I didn't like his really hostile way of interacting with people. Big comes in as replacement and hasn't had this hostility and... *rereads Big's iso* actually I have no clue what I liked about him, he's terrible!In post 651, Mainez wrote:can you explain this? regarding the vibes. what is it that they have posted (prior to this post of yours) and what about it makes you feel better about the slot? and how are you feeling about the slot now since you were keeping tabs on it.
So I came back in to the game after being absent for most of a week and I was happy to jump on the Kalimar wagon because Kali hadn't contributed much and coasting in the background is how scum win. But now I'm done a reread and I'm not sure he's actually the best for the lynch today.In post 651, Mainez wrote:
you started the day by voting BRO because you were bringing your suspicions from d1 over, is Kalimar more suspicious now or what? how do you feel about Kalimar's recent posts since you labelled him as a "hiding-in-the-background kind of player"? do you still think so?
In post 609, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 604, notquitethere wrote:wanting people to think bullet-proofs are all town.
You'll have to point out where the hell you got this from because my head did a 180 spin when I read it.
