RIP is scum.
2-3 more scum. One possibly 3rd party.
In post 2597, Klingoncelt wrote:
So RIP lied and has zero hidden info, but he really doesn't like you, Narn. Any idea why?
In post 2542, Suzune wrote:I believe looking at the situation the sala kill was the only one that the scum could have made given the situation from yesterday, so sadly I am not surprised. They could not risk killing someone on another train because that would be like confirming the other train was wise. So in order to keep in fighting high they limited the control of the town. I suppose from that perspective it was a smart move. It would then be wise to look at those not on the train though as I imagine it may lead to more evidence. Sorry the tired thoughts of my insomnia. I will check with he final decisions that led to that vote train later in the day.
In post 2543, LittleGumball wrote:
So a while ago I kind of skimmed the majority of the previous day, and Salamence was really the only person I trusted.
It is obvious to me that scum is controlling this game. I'm going to look through the game if I can (will likely be tomorrow bc it's 1am and i'm tired af) and I'm going to pick out some reads. My prediction is that, assuming there are 4 mafia members in the game, at least one of them is an inactive, if not two.
The remaining members are actively participating in discussion and have high influence on who is getting lynched
Can someone summarize the whole Hider discussion? I'm not overly familiar with playing with Hiders but I have a general idea of how they work.
In post 2546, RIP wrote:I will decide the lynch today.
In post 2548, RIP wrote:I'm down to kill gumball too.
In post 2549, Thor665 wrote:Vote: CDB
The Narn vote looks silly to me, but I like that RIP at least comes out of the gate swinging.
That said -we had like 3 counterwagons to this guy yesterday.
Hint.
In post 2552, Sinsun1 wrote:
Scum are making weird kills. I mean REALLY weird kills. I'm sorry, but either scum is stupid or the majority of the "good" active players are the scum themselves. Senator was a good lynch even if he was town. He killed the bloody miller who basically everyone else town read him which got ANOTHER townie killed and scum failed to kill N2, so if we have a roleblocker, I really suggest he outs who he blocked. Because unless scum tried killing Max directly, I believe the blocker hit the jackpot there.
Senator who bloody shot the miller killing a hider
IF my earlier prediction of 7 anti-town was correct we'd be a sort of lylo where the game would be out of town's hands and reliant on 3rd parties swinging around and offing scum themselves. But let's be generous here and assume 5-6 anti-town. 5 is being a pipe dream and 6 is hopeful.
Suzune makes a good point in why Sala dies which from her game-play so far is not hard to believe came from an analytical townie perspective of their death.
Another thing is that Sala said they'd sheep Thor the next day which could be another reason, albeit small reason to be dead which would shine a small lean town on Thor.
In post 2553, davesaz wrote:Personally I thought CDB's response to the wagon seemed town
In post 2597, Klingoncelt wrote:So RIP lied and has zero hidden info, but he really doesn't like you, Narn. Any idea why?
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:So which scum play is unusual for a newb?
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:Does being new at the game exempt you from being mafia?
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:Underestimating those you think are weak will get you every time in my opinion.
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:We need to be careful, I love to wax mafia theory and to see other people do it but we are treading into only theory crafting here. I find it interesting which you need to dissect everyone's posts and to be very active in voicing an opinion. People who do that are usually portrayed as threatening. So I am merely suggesting that since you are still alive that is bears why. The mafia is clearly controlling this game, finding out what the points of strength for them are needs to be the goal. Otherwise, we will be crushed in coming days. So now, in my opinion, it is time to question the actions of the last two days so we do not fall into a routine that gets exploited.I don't think it does at all - do you?
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:Words are empty, I have nothing concrete like actual evidence to back my claim. I just believe that posts like this, post 1396, post 1798, post 1960, post 1965. I was told once in a mafia game, here on this site, that mafia do not need to actively scum hunt. Rather mafia need to look for inconsistencies that can be exploited and make it look like it is someone else's idea. This was interesting to me at the time and I find it interesting and something I keep on the back burner. I believe that his posts show active thinking and moving. Also a honestly about bad moves and active rethinking showing that the thinking is not locked on something. Being locked, unless you are sure, on one idea limits you ability to see a person as something else.
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:I apologise, I do not understand what the question is then. You asked if I thought he played like me and I said probably not. If there was a much larger question being asked you are going to have to ask again.
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:This is the case you meant?
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:I have never seen people so fixated over a hider before.
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:However, I fail to see how the amount of someones scum hunting and how often they play are good factual reasons. (Those were taken from your read that I quoted earlier).
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:This is an interesting question and I approach it with some uncertainty. Strangely enough it looks like a trap.
In post 2598, Suzune wrote:Also, they are written down in my notebook since my laptop had to go into the computer store because he was getting my too hot so I would have to type them all out for you. I will continue to comment on actions of the game and you will see more colours from that. I believe this answer may disappoint you but so be it~
In post 2603, Titus wrote:#2576, If I only reassessed reads I had doubt over Thor, I'd reassess everything. I may be confident but I don't stick to reads I feel are "right" when shit hits the fan. I was wrong on my biggest scumread. I have to reset everything. That's the way it is.
In post 2603, Titus wrote:The more you try to make my reset confusing, the harder it is to actually reset on your slot.
In post 2610, RIP wrote:I didn't trek anyone.
I think Klingon is scum cuz her play is bad and distant.
I'm pretty sure narm is scum. I want to resolve him
In post 2615, RIP wrote:Also we can get rid of peregrine anytime.
Dude just claimed scum by calling me and CBd scum yet he is not voting any of us?
In post 2469, RIP wrote:Yes that's correct. So then CBd is bashik and I'm friends with him apparently. I own a barbershop yes I know that too
In post 2609, Thor665 wrote:You are like an eel.
In post 2617, PeregrineV wrote:In post 2615, RIP wrote:Also we can get rid of peregrine anytime.
Dude just claimed scum by calling me and CBd scum yet he is not voting any of us?
We want to catch your other scumbuddies before lynching CDB.
In post 2620, Titus wrote:In post 2617, PeregrineV wrote:In post 2615, RIP wrote:Also we can get rid of peregrine anytime.
Dude just claimed scum by calling me and CBd scum yet he is not voting any of us?
We want to catch your other scumbuddies before lynching CDB.
Who is "We"?
How did you deduce I was town from RIP and CDB scum?
VOTE: Perv
In post 2614, RIP wrote:U are voting CBd. He claimed the guy that should be a town. Idk
In post 2617, PeregrineV wrote:In post 2615, RIP wrote:Also we can get rid of peregrine anytime.
Dude just claimed scum by calling me and CBd scum yet he is not voting any of us?
We want to catch your other scumbuddies before lynching CDB.