In post 518, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:1. My point being is YOU said I didn't give her the chance to play like that game. How was it my fault? Yeah that's bullshit.
How wasn't it your fault?
In post 518, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:2. Yes she did, Diego asked questions and she said she wasn't going to answer them because he didn't answer her rvs questions. It was that very reason i voted her. Why are you lying and ignoring stuff that ACTUALLY happened?
She actually stated that she was more than willing to answer them if he answered her questions. How is that remotely scummy?
In post 518, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:3. Nothing she said about me was true. Clearly you aren't reading this game. Yet another lie from you
I am reading the game. Unlike you, though, I'm not making something out of nothing because I'm not a fucking scrub. Cite these instances and explain clearly what is scummy about them; but I already know you won't be able to.
You quoted jack shit's worth of evidence. Lie much???0?00?0??0?
In post 518, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Also yes I realize I'm probably not using conf.bias right but idk what to call it when a person ignores all evidence and hangs their hat on "meta" when the meta is proven to be different. You provided me the link to the game to try and prove her town meta and her play was NOTICEABLY different.
So I don't give a fuck if you vote me cause I'm right, you are wrong (probably scum) and elusive is 100% scum.
Vote stays.
The meta is not different, it is lacking in one element - elusive's calm phase. You have yet to explain how her rage being part of her town meta is irrelevant and it's probably because you can't.
Really, you're lucky that I restrained myself from making the most personally offensive comment in the game so far out of sheer frustration at your loudmouthed, obnoxious, empty bullshit. I highly doubt you will be as lucky in the future of you retain this insufferable attitude.