MINI 1688 — BEES!!! — game over
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
I'm liking where my vote is at. Ducky is going to have to do something towny for me, other than post useless stuff.
Bella and Bob (fuck me there's two Bob's in this game ... Bicephalous Bob) have been quite towny so far. Especially Bella for the proper questioning of KayP and the recognition of Glork's naked vote.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 40, Kitty Galore wrote:So are we officially out of RVS?
In post 33, Bellaphant wrote:RVS is over now
But what would be even better, is ifyougaveyourthoughts on if we are/were (at the time of your post) out of RVS, instead of polling the town.
Bella, what is strange about ducks posts, just lack of engagement? Anything else?
This is directed at Bella, but I've made a comment about ducky too. For me, yes it's lack of engagement, combined with ducky's meta (for example: this game or this game) where they are town and have early posts that at least resemble productive content (although still fun and lighthearted). Unfortunately there are no completed scum games in their wiki, so I cannot find if this lack of productive posting is a scumpattern of theirs or not. Yes, this is an early read, without a ton to go by other than lack of content and some meta to back it up (no, meta isn't the sole reason), and is a read of mine that could possibly change based off how the game progresses. But for now, I like where my vote stands until they can start to post something useful. This is good pressure.
Looking forward to hearing answers from KayP.
I think we all would.KayP does need to explain what they make of the L-2.
I will say the L-2 to me seems like a bit of RVS (my vote was RVS, but now its serious), combined with some "ZOMG WAGON!", and a vote or two I don't full understand. I also don't believe ducky is suddenly going to get quicklynched, because that would just be idiotic for anyone to do. I believe Bob Loblaw's was a "ZOMG WAGON vote!" based off his choo choo comment. TTH's vote was suspicious, with an unannounced L-2, but then they asked to activate a triple voting power. I don't know what to make of that as I've never played a game with multiple voting power. I'm assuming it is real, because Marquis responded to it, but haven't seen the triple vote yet.
I also look forward to hearing from you about some of the players in this game besides "I like their posts" as you state below
I like Bella's and Green Crayons posts.
What do you like about Bella and GC's posts? How do you feel about my posts?
I'm slightly perturbed that your post only scratched at the surface level.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 41, KayP wrote:Should the burden of proof not be on yourself to show why duck is town, not on duck to prove she's not mafia?
I don't believe the goal is to show people are town. The goal is to find scum, so I'm trying to push on Ducky (and now Kitty) to see how they respond so I can start to understand their mindset in order to sort their alignment, instead of letting Ducky coast by with pointless posts, and Kitty with a surface level post.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 45, KayP wrote:In post 43, Fro99er wrote:This is directed at Bella, but I've made a comment about ducky too. For me, yes it's lack of engagement, combined with ducky's meta (for example: this game or this game) where they are town and have early posts that at least resemble productive content (although still fun and lighthearted). Unfortunately there are no completed scum games in their wiki, so I cannot find if this lack of productive posting is a scumpattern of theirs or not. Yes, this is an early read, without a ton to go by other than lack of content and some meta to back it up (no, meta isn't the sole reason), and is a read of mine that could possibly change based off how the game progresses. But for now, I like where my vote stands until they can start to post something useful. This is good pressure.
Hmm. So, basically, you've seen ducky play differently in the past as a townsperson, and this makes you think the different play here is somehow noteworthy or alignment-related? I still feel like there's very little to go on right now and judging someone's posts this early based on content level is a big jump to make. It's especially concerning because you yourself only madeone postjust saying hello to various people and voting randomly, and your second post was demanding better stuff from ducky. That's a bit hypocritical.
My push on ducky is to get them to start providing content. I actually mentioned it's an early read and is very possible it will change based on how they react. But this is a good spot for pressure now. The meta is *supporting* my pressure as something they don't typically do as town. It is not my *sole* reason for voting them.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 45, KayP wrote:your second post was demanding better stuff from ducky. That's a bit hypocritical.
My second post had content in it. It explained WHY I was voting ducky, and it explained WHY I thought Bella and BBob (especially bella) were making good points/posts.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 49, KayP wrote:Can you explain a bit more what about ducky's posts make you think "lack of engagement"? I think I get what you mean, but that phrase is sort of just vague.
Do I need to ISO ducky to show why this is lack of engagement? Fine.
Spoiler: Ducky first post
A vote. Can't tell if this is RVS or some kind of meta with Bulge.
Spoiler: Ducky second post
Commenting on their L-2 as being popular, but saying nothing about it other than that. The rest is just silly reply stuff in response to my RVS vote on ducky.
Spoiler: Ducky third post
Um. What?
Spoiler: Ducky fourth post
Who is false as hell?
I mean, KayP, what do you see as engaging from ducky, in a pro-town productive way (if you were paying attention, I also didn't just say engaging, but also used the word productive, meaning I want ducky to provide something productive)? Sure, she's "engaging" us by posting cryptic things that I can't begin to interpret even if I wanted to (or if there was anything to interpret at all), but other than that, it's a bunch of fluff posts. If she wants to clarify the meaning of some of these posts, that would be spectacular.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 47, KayP wrote:Oh, sure, the goal is to find mafia. I agree there, that much is obvious. But given statistics, the person you are pushing/voting/arguing with is MORE LIKELY to be town than mafia since there are way more town than mafia in games. I guess I'm having trouble understanding why you seem to be STARTING from a mindset of "this person is mafia, prove me otherwise" instead of "this person is statistically likely to be town, unless proven otherwise".
I'm a statistician by trade, I don't need help with statistics, but thank you.
I'm not starting from a mindset of "this person is mafia" I'm starting from the mindset of "I'd like to have some productive talk from this person, because then I can start to understand their mindset". Productive talk is typically pro-town.
If I started with the mindset ducky is town, I'd have to start with the mindset that everyone is town, which would be silly. The goal is to find scum, not to assume everyone starts as town.
Anyway - I'd like to hear from both Ducky and Kitty, as I mentioned earlier. (lots of animals involved in this game!)-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 52, KayP wrote:My point in this is that your reasoning behind considering the vote "serious" seems flimsy when it could be applied to you, me, and probably the vast majority of the playerlist.
My vote became serious when Ducky provided FOUR posts with lack of content. If you think my second, third, and fourth post was lack of engagement, I can't help you. You are just making stuff up now. Ducky had four posts with a complete lack of productive content.
Your early posts also had content (mentioning the L-2 in your second post, but your third post and now your push on me is even better content)! Bella's and Green Crayons and BBob's early posts also had good content!
This is why I'm pressuring ducky. Now we're just getting into stupid bickering mode.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 60, Green Crayons wrote:like
I'm all for being fuck rvs
but fro99ger is like "HEY YALL how about some meta seriousness up in this thread SUPER SERIOUS FACE"
ugh stop it you scumbag
I tend to take this game pretty seriously, even more so than I should at times. I'm usually the one with the most posts or damn near close to it in most of my games. It gives me something to do when I sit on my ass watching sports and/or drinking booze. Usually to the point of pissing people off about how much I post (I see I've already accomplished that).-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 67, Bellaphant wrote:He used meta, 'coz KayP was talking about it, no?
To be fair, I was the one to bring up meta, in my response to Kitty Galore.
Speaking of. She asked you a question as well.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 72, Bellaphant wrote:@Frog, yeah, that's what I meant, sorry. Also, I've answered Kitty's questions
My apologies. You have. Missed it.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
I'd love it if you stated a case of WHY you think I'm scum, rather than a drive-by vote.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 86, Bellaphant wrote:The TTH thing sucks.
What does this mean?-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 89, Bellaphant wrote:@Frog, she was obviously joking, otherwise lalal would be dead. Also, 'coz your vote was on her, she would be extra dead. So saying it was suspicious, while still supporting the wagon, is bad.
What? I had no idea it was a joke. Seriously. I'm fairly new to this site, and thought that a triple vote power could be a thing. How was it obvious she was joking? I read it as she could vote three different people, but apparently you read it as she could vote ducky 3 times.
I never said the triple vote was suspicious, did I? I said I didn't know what to make of it. I said the unnanounced L-2 (which was before the triple comment) was suspicious.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 90, lalaladucks wrote:Fro99, mate, are you joking. I will not be confined by meta tyvm and anyway
I never said I'd confine you by meta. I said it was a *supporting* reason, not the main reason.
it would be more accurate if you looked at what I was posting closer to the end of that Open X/Y because ~wheeeee~
I will go look at this, but not sure what you're getting at.
I will UNVOTE: for now. I think I need to take a step back.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 105, lalaladucks wrote:This is because I literally never role scumsies
OMFG I mentioned that!
That's also why I said meta was simply a BACKUP to my reason to vote you. It was NOT my reason to vote you. I can also see you posted stuff of content that clearly went over my head, hence my unvote.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 107, lalaladucks wrote:
Spoiler: Ducky third post
Um. What?
Spoiler: Ducky fourth post
Who is false as hell?
<3 TTH <3 is much more false than Desdemona (from Othello and this is an easy feat since poor Desdy is actually v good) and that triple vote was obviously a har har joke.
[snip]
Have I sufficiently clarified?
1. KayP pointed out your "false as hell" was in response to TTH, and Bella pointed out TTH was making a joke. All of that went over my head and I'm fucking sorry, I'm still new to this. Like I said, I seriously thought a multi-vote could be a thing in this game and had no idea it is/was a joke.
2. You have clarified, yes.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 145, Untrod Tripod wrote:also your response to my lalavote is pretty much... completely missing the point? willfully perhaps?
I have no idea what point I'm missing.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 178, Green Crayons wrote:oh I thought you meant, like, putting a defibrillator to a living person... which makes 'em dead.
Defibs are for reviving dead people.
In post 148, Untrod Tripod wrote:I just found the phrasing obnoxious
that was literally all that was there
Fair enough. I'll accept this.
I want Kitty to respond. 40 was weaksauce, as I pointed out. The Shadoxx case is good too. I still think Bella's town.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
I'm going to defend Bella here for a sec.
She first townread me all the way up until 89 where she makes the comment about the triple vote being a joke, and the fact that I remained on the wagon with a triple vote would mean ducky is dead, and that's why it was bad.
When I replied I didn't realize the triple vote was a joke, and I thought "activating the triple vote" meant she would keep her L-2 on ducky, and then vote twootherpeople, bella realized how I could have missed that as a joke, and said she mis-read my mis-read.
I think at that point, she had no reason to press harder, given she was town reading me already and satisfied by my misunderstanding of the triple vote.
For the KayP thing, Bella had already set up her KayP vote in 72 and 81 as well, so it wasn't completely out of left field, although the Glork post did probably push her to actually use her vote.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 191, TellTaleHeart wrote:
It's little, throwaway things like Post 117 that bug me. I make a raspberry after reading those kinds of posts. The Bella town read was really half-assed and you just kind of piggy-backed on KayP's Shadox case.In post 186, lalaladucks wrote:In post 170, TellTaleHeart wrote:You know, the more wine I drink, the more I really want to take a defibrillator to the ducks wagon.
I mean, GC and myself also piggy-backed on the Shadox case. There isn't much more of a case to build other than what KayP laid out in 132, what with all of two Shadoxx posts at this point.
I think the bandwagon is good. Let's get Shadoxx to actually do something.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 194, Bob Loblaw wrote:It still does not follow.
"Frogger saw X as suspicious. Frogger continued to push wagon despite suspicion X."
I also noted that the ducky wagon wasn't going to turn into a quicklynch in the very same post I was suspicious of TTH's vote despite being on a wagon with TTH. Because at that point, all I wanted to do was get ducky to talk, so I was comfortable with the situation, knowing a quicklynch wasn't happening.
In post 43, Fro99er wrote:I also don't believe ducky is suddenly going to get quicklynched, because that would just be idiotic for anyone to do.
I mean, did you honestly believe that there was a chance Ducky would get quicklynched there? Of course not.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 198, Bob Loblaw wrote:I guess it depends on the severity of the read but when I view a vote as suspicious it usually stems from the idea that the player being voted for isn't actually scum.
Understood, and I'd agree if it wasn't, oh, a couple hours into the game.
But at that point in the game, I was just trying to get ducky to talk after having 4 of what I incorrectly thought were useless posts. And you know what? Her next three posts were much better! I explained I wasn't worried about a quickhammer or anything, so TTH's suspicious vote didn't much matter at that point because a quicklynch wasn't happening.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 205, TellTaleHeart wrote:I know it's not what anyone wants to hear, but the Shadox case is pretty trumped up and not really deserving of the attention or the wagon it's getting.
So what are we supposed to do? Let the newbie sit there and do nothing as we approach 3 days from deadline? Hehasposted today...but not in this thread.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 218, Green Crayons wrote:In post 213, Fro99er wrote:My point was, if people don't push on Shadoxx (or Kitty), we're just going to let them sit there and do fuck all in a quick game. It's one thing to go V/LA or just completely flake. It's another thing to be active elsewhere yet not post in this thread.
That's cool and all, but my point is is that you appear to agree with TTH's basic premise (the Shadox wagon is bad for the reasons previous articulated ITT), but that you're maintaining a Shadox vote now simply as a lurker vote.
I'm trying to figure out what suspicions you are still embracing, and what suspicions you're dropping.
1) Do not agree with TTH's premise.
2) I'm pointing out an additional reason other than the case KayP made (that you are citing as well, and that I admitted I (along with you) was sheeping in post 195) to keep the pressure on Shadoxx.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 233, KayP wrote:Oh, we are allowed to mention this? I thought we couldn't mention this because of ongoing games rules...
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=30908
OKAY: "Zoraster is alive in 4 games and is posting in those games, but he hasn't posted here in 3 days."
All I did was mention Shadoxx had posted today, but not in this thread. Seems within the rules to me, no?-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 119, Fro99er wrote:@Mod: I am officially on V/LA from Monday through Thursday (6/18) because of all day work meetings but I will try to respond in the evenings anyway. Except Tuesday evening. USA women's world cup (GO USA!)
(I already told Marquis this before the game started)
In post 128, Fro99er wrote:So apparently I got out of my Monday and Tuesday meetings. Still have work, but should be able to be a bit more active than planned. Wed/Thurs will still be tough to be (BEE) active.
Will have lower activity until Thurs eve.
Also@Mod can you prod Shadoxx? They posted today, but not in this thread but it's BEEn 48 hours-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 339, KayP wrote:What, exactly, did you like about Shaddox’s post?
I said I'll tell when I'm back from phone posting tonight.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
Long wall post warning!
I'm working my way down Shadoxx post for highlights of what I agreed with, what I am being nitpicky about, and where I want to add more to key portions of the discussion after Shadoxx had his post 294.
In post 294, Shadoxx8 wrote:@Bellaphant, your playing extremely pro-town at this point. All of your posts have been in-depth and contributive to the town. You have performed exactly as a post-card townie (gods help us if you are Mafia-alignment.). Your playing very similar to a player in my last game, Glitch, who not only was VT, but also provided posts with lots of detail and criticism of all players, rather than focussing on one player (what I call tunnel-visioning, which I can do a lot of the time, something I’m trying to rectify). You also have acted skeptical at some points, and questions peoples votes (if not in RVS).
This is a fair assessment of Bella up to this post 294, but I disagree slightly. Bella had started pretty towny for me. She pushed in the right places early with a good line of questioning of KayP to get us out of RVS, and pushed KayP for a reachy/vague post 41 (and Bella backs up her reasons in post 72), as well as the fact that GC pushed KayP into voting me. Bella makes a push on me about being on the early ducky wagon while I was finding TTH's L-2 suspicious, which is even more towny of her to realize she was misunderstanding my interpretation of my misunderstanding of TTH's triple vote joke. She then votes KayP, albeit after prodding from Glork. But it wasn't without precedence, as UT seemed to imply in 231.
But where Bella starts to worry me is she then moves her vote on to ducky for lack of content, but otherwise goes unexplained. This felt opportunistic, and at that point ducky had started to actually provide content (see Ducky content in 90, 105, 107, 141 (which was sheeped KayP reasoning though)). Yes, ducky's content wasn't fantastic, but Bella didn't really follow up on it, and it felt opportunistic to get ducky to L-2 with deadline approaching.
After post 294, Bella starts to get even worse. She changes her vote to Shadoxx for calling her town. I guess she thinks Shadoxx is cozying up to her as scum, but it feels so reactionary (I might think differently from Bella, but I start to notice buddying after a bit of a pattern of it) and again opportunistic, this time putting Shadoxx at L-3 for a single reason. She's been a wagon hopper rather than a wagon starter at every point after her KayP vote. In 340, Bella claims Shadoxx throws suspicion at her, but I don't see it above ("God help us if you are mafia" isn't exactly throwing suspicion, it's more a statement of belief in his mind). Bella, what other reasons do you have for voting Shadoxx besides them calling you towny?
TL;DR --Bella is moving into my scum pile after an early towny start, for unoriginal and opportunistic hopping on the ducky and shadoxx wagons with weak arguments.
@Bob I say your playing town-to-null at this point. It is hard to place a player into either player (except if they have very striking play). You are not as much of a town read as Bella, because her posts have more detail IMO. However, you haven’t actively followed a bandwagon AFAIK.
This is fine too from Shadoxx. I agree, BiBob didn't have a ton of material by the time of Shadoxx's post, with the main highlights being:
- saying "the wordy people are fine"
- BobLob is formulaic
- Shadoxx case is interesting but he wants to lynch the experienced (actually, this could be a scum mindset now that I think of it)
- A little back and forth with TTH which didn't exactly move the gamestate forward
Since 294, BiBob has made an awkward push on Glork.
- It started out as "gut" in 305, yet calling glork reasonable in the same post.
- In 309, it's still gut and he's starting to disagree with his Glork read already
- Asks UT for his read on Glork in 313, then votes Glork in 329, essentially for disagreeing with Glork about Shadoxx's motivation for calling Bella towny.But never states how Glork's disagreement with BiBob actually makes Glork scummy.I'm still trying to figure out why BiBob thinks Glork is scummy, other than disagreeing with the Shadoxx motivation.
TL;DR --BiBob started out kinda null with one red flag (lynch the veterans!), then made a really awkward push on Glork. Bob is trying to grasp for reasons that he hasn't even quite clearly stated, and appears wishy-washy on his Glork stance anyway. This is suuuper clumsy from BiBob. Is it scummy? I kinda think he's trying to drum up a mislynch.
@Bob#2 It may just be your play-style, but your play style isn’t being very pro-town at this point. The inclusion of pictures and filler in posts is fine, but what is questionable is your liking for joining bandwagons and overall complying with the flow. A lot of your posts have also been incredibly short, providing not much detail. IGMEOY
I can see Shadoxx's point of view about BobLob joining bandwagons and all. I mean, BobLob *hasn't* done a whole lot, but I actually think what BobLob has done been fine. He's clearly calling out attention to his bandwagon votes, which I don't see scum really doing. His cases on myself and subsequently on Bella were both towny.
@Glork. I’m not sure what to think about you. On one hand, some of your posts are rather good, but you also immediately jump to scum-team conclusion on D1. This suggests that you are anxious to end the day on a vote, as the town should only start systematically scanning for scum-tells, not pairing town players together on D1. IGMEOY.
I disagree with Shadoxx's stance on Glork, but it's pretty nit-picky on my end. I think Glork actually makes a great case on KayP in 95, and 101. Post 130 was meant to get Bella to actually do something with her vote (and it worked!), and the rest of his posts were just kinda statements, but he sets up his later push on BiBob in 293. Yes, Glork throws out a scum-team pair, but it didn't appear "anxious" IMO. It was more tongue-in-cheek from Glork.
Since 294, I actually disagree with Glork on the Shadoxx/Bella thing (like BiBob does), but I'm not using that as a reason to say Glork is scummy. In fact, Glork is interested in Shadoxx's mindest on how he formed the Bella opinion (see 331), which is the right approach. Glork's 334 is a very good retort to BiBob, especially the 3 points at the bottom of that post.
TL;DR --This is scumhunting Glork, with a good push on KayP, Bella, and especially on BiBob.
@KayPIn post 47, KayP wrote:Oh, sure, the goal is to find mafia. I agree there, that much is obvious. But given statistics, the person you are pushing/voting/arguing with is MORE LIKELY to be town than mafia since there are way more town than mafia in games. I guess I'm having trouble understanding why you seem to be STARTING from a mindset of "this person is mafia, prove me otherwise" instead of "this person is statistically likely to be town, unless proven otherwise".
Your point here is what? Maybe I’m missing the context of this post (viewing these in ISO BTW) but what you are essentially saying is that we shouldn’t vote for people because they are likely to be town? The point of the game is to vote and find the Mafia, before they lynch all town members. This statement directly contradicts the purpose of Mafia! You are pushing for us to vote random people, which is directly in the Mafia’s favour!
In post 134, KayP wrote:What is wrong with people on this site and making reasonless votes?
There is something called RVS.
I think that KayP is currently the most scummy player. However, I do not think he is Mafia. He’s the best vote for us IMO, but with Ducks at L-1. I’m unsure whether I’ll swap over on D1.
First of all, his reasons on KayP are decent. He rightly calls out that KayP is approaching mafia from the opposite mindset of how it should be approached. He even says KayP is the most scummy player. But I WTF at "I do not think this is mafia". So they've been scummy, but not mafia, but also the best vote for us. Just...WHAT?
Anyway, I don't know where I stand on KayP. She questioned me well on my Ducky vote, even up to the point of disproving my assumption of Ducky's lack of content. That felt towny KayP. But I can't help but agree with Shadoxx that the mindset of "assume everyone is town" instead of "try to find scum" is weird and backward. That's a mafia mindset, IMO. I still need to sort KayP.
Since 294, KayP goes on the aggressive against Shadoxx's points against her in 339. I can't say I agree with KayP, and I cannot tell if her push is town motivated to find scum in Shadoxx, or overly defensive scum. She's also trying to make sense of UT, which is fine, but she should push this harder if town.
TL;DR -- I have no idea on KayP
@Kitty. Whilst you haven’t contributed much yet, you have provided a valid reason for your inactivity, so I have to place you in null for now (hate doing that )
Kitty, where are you? Contribute! If we are near deadline and need to avoid a no-lynch, this is a good policy lynch.
@TellTaleHeart. Ooh yes, I like your play style. Like Bella, you are question and scrutinising everybody, and not joining bandwagons for the sake of it like some other players. You are correct about my previous post, it was a rant more than anything, not a reason for voting Ducks. You are definitely the second highest town-read for the town.
I agree. TTH, other than that weird thing with BiBob which I don't know what to make of, has p obviously been scumhunting.
@Bulge Why the lack of posts? This early on, inactiveness must always regarded as suspicious, unless it is justified. Here, you either are simply one of those players who does not care about the game, or wants to remain in the shadows, and simply complying with what the town wants. Scum-tell right here. But not Mafia read as again, it’s only D1.
The Bulge hasn't done jack shit, and is in prod range. Has Bulge actually disappeared, or skating through D1? Considering Bulge has been fairly active elsewhere on the site, I'm leaning toward skating. If somehow we're very near deadline and need to avoid a no-lynch, Bulge, like Kitty, is a good policy lynch.
Left out UT and Crayons for now because I largely agree with Shadoxx and don't have much to add on those two.
I want to lynch BiBob. I don't think he's been pro-town at all, and to the contrary, quite scummy, with what feels like a faked, wishy-washy, gut push on Glork, with little concrete reason (other than DISAGREE WITH GLORK!) to appear to finally scumhunt, after Glork calls him out for doing jack shit in 293.
VOTE: Bicephalous Bob-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 358, KayP wrote:In post 356, Fro99er wrote:Anyway, I don't know where I stand on KayP. She questioned me well on my Ducky vote, even up to the point of disproving my assumption of Ducky's lack of content. That felt towny KayP. But I can't help but agree with Shadoxx that the mindset of "assume everyone is town" instead of "try to find scum" is weird and backward. That's a mafia mindset, IMO. I still need to sort KayP.
Ugh. Wtf is this. Perhaps you should stick to statistics and leave logic to the rest of us?
In no way, shape, or form is "assume everyone is town" mutually exclusive to "try to find scum". Both of those can coexist together! You see, that's not why I said you should assume everyone is town.
Fair enough. But your mindset is still backward. The point I'm making is your mindset is "assume everyone is town" contradicts how to play the game. I play the game by FINDING SCUM. Here is your earlier post on it:
In post 47, KayP wrote:I guess I'm having trouble understanding why you seem to be STARTING from a mindset of "this person is mafia, prove me otherwise" instead of "this person is statistically likely to be town, unless proven otherwise".
If I have the mindset of "this person is mafia" it's because I found something they did scummy, not because I'm approaching with a presupposed mindset that they are mafia. You're making stuff up about my mindset.
I was saying that asking someone to prove their innocence is placing the burden of proof on the incorrect party. It's more likely the person you're attacking is town than scum... and therefore, you should have reasons why they are scum. You, Froggy, were saying that ducks should have to have her innocence proven, rather than you proving why she is mafia. THAT is why I brought up the "everyone is more likely to be town" bit, and in no way, shape, or form did I imply that you should not attempt to find scum.
I found, early in the game, her lack of what I perceived of as a lack of productive content, to be scummy. I did not come in with a "this person is mafia, prove me otherwise" mindset (as you state), but as a "I need to sort this person" mindset. I moved them into my early scumpile based off that lack of content, combined with some meta. I did not start with a mindset of "she is scum". I let what little facts there were at the time start to form my opinion (of which I have since changed...GASP!)
This is totally disingenuous.
FFS, what is disengenuous? I'm very sincere when I say I believe you are approaching the game from the wrong mindset. I also am sincere in saying I don't know what to make of your slot.
Jesus freaking christ. I was simply saying I agreed with Shadoxx's stance on the mindset, and not yours. I don't need to get into some shitty theory debate.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
So you have one scum lean. Can you explain why ducky is your sole scum lean? Why aren't you voting anyone? We're near deadline and we need your opinions and reasons for your reads.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
This is ridiculous...what are you doing KayP? Just hammer now.
BiBob is V/LA so I'm not sure he's even here to claim. We don't need a freaking claim anyway. We already had one VT claim and with one hour left until deadline we'd need several people online here to agree on and switch wagons. I agree with BobLob, hammer BiBob NOW!-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
I mean...the next biggest wagon (Shadoxx) has TWO votes. Are we seriously going to fucking sit here and wait for a claim that's only going to help scum and then hope 5 people switch wagons in time?
I mean FFS. KayP and Bella are the last two on the Shadoxx wagon, both asking for claims with under an hour left until deadline.-
-
Fro99er
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 433, KayP wrote:When else did Bella try to follow the crowd?
Um...it should be quite obvious. Glork already pointed out posts 130/131 where he calls out Bella, and Bella responds with a vote on KayP. Then she does the same thing just now when I call her out (she responds with a vote on Shadoxx). But the parts that bothered me the most about Bella were the points I made yesterday, and then how the end of D1 went down. First are the points I made yesterday:
Spoiler: Frog on Bella D1
Speaking of follow the crowd, let's look at how Bella ends D1. First...
Spoiler: Bella follows townreads
She says twice that she simply wants to follow town reads (instead of actually, you know, doing some scumhunting). This is a "trying to fit in as a townsperson" mentality.
Then later that same post Bella says...
Would prefer a claim, tho.
Prefer a claim??? With 1 hour left on D1??? What's the point in wanting a claim there? I mean, first, BiBob was on V/LA...so he wasn't going to claim. Next, the second biggest wagon had TWO votes (which ironically was the Shadoxx wagon which Bella and KayP were on). If BiBob does happen to be there and claims a PR, there isn't enough time to gather enough people to lynch someone else (and if somehow there was, it's a last minute panic lynch). Instead, what's likely to happen is a no-lynch and a PR is outed, meaning scum knows where to place the night kill. Asking for a claim in that situation only fits a scum mentality.
Finally, right before the KayP hammer, Bella asks this...
In post 411, Bellaphant wrote:Frog, I can hammer now if you want?
This totally reads as "hey I'm scum just checking to make sure it's OK for me to hammer so I don't get the attention on D2 after I hammer this townie".
I actually am suspicious of both Bella and KayP for the end of D1. They both ask for a claim with an hour left, both were on the Shadoxx wagon, after having earlier been suspicious of each other (Bella voted KayP in 131, KayP had mentioned in her 192 she was happy with the two wagons going on at the time, which ironically happened to be......Bella and Shadoxx). Something weird is going on in those three, but Bella's play strikes me as the most suspicious, because it's not coming from a town mindset.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 442, Green Crayons wrote:@frog:I can get behind the asking-permission-mentality is scum, but the asking for a claim = autoscum is a real stretch.
It's not asking for a claim. I ask for a claim at L-1 also
It's asking for a claim when, we've
a) Already had one VT claim
b) Have 1 hour to go...then the only thing that can happen with 1 hour to go is to get information for a NK
Seriously...do you really think a claim with 1 hour to go would have done town any good?-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 447, Green Crayons wrote:The argument that asking for a claim in that situation was helping direct the scum NK is also a little warped, because, like... BiBob was going to be lynched anyways? So asking for a claim was, in a sense, actually (potentially) tying the scum's NK hands because they wouldn't have gotten the BiBob mislynch, and so scum was going to have to NK BiBob if they actually wanted to get rid of him.
I guess? But this is somewhat coming from the post-perspective of BiBob being odd-night rolecop. At the time, with one hour left, not knowing BiBob's status then getting BiBob to claim would (likely) only:
1) Be a VT claim - then he's lynched and the PR pool is narrowed down by two VT claims (ducky and BiBob)
2) Be a PR claim - and either BiBob is:
a) still lynched (for a multitude of reasons, like not believing the claim, a counter claim, lack of time or something)
b) not lynched and we reach a no lynch, and BiBob is an outed PR
c) not lynched and we reach a consensus lynch by getting 5 people in one hour to change their votes to Shadoxx, or 6+ to change their vote to someone else, hoping to hit scum, and BiBob is an outed PR
To me...option c, which is probably the best outcome also seemed very unlikely with one hour left (even if we assume BiBob was NOT on V/LA).
It just seems weird that if you are going to ask for a claim, that you do so with ONE HOUR LEFT when there is almost no time to organize a contingency lynch. Just feels like scum searching for info going into the night.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 447, Green Crayons wrote:I am saying that you are saying asking for a claim in the situation presented here is autoscum. And I am disagreeing with that.
Fair enough. What I said was "it only fits a scum mentality", so I can see where you interpret "autoscum". Also poor word choice by me I guess. To me, what I meant, is it's more likely a scum mentality (or anti-town mentality at best) than a town mentality given the situation.
But this claim deal isn't my main point. It's simply an added point to combine with my other points about Bella (and the larger Bella/KayP situation) that asking for a claim in this situation can indeed fit a scum mentality.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 457, Green Crayons wrote:If BiBob is going to be lynched anyways - thereby negating the scum needing to NK him to get him out of the game - I really don't see the scum motivation in seeking a claim.
Right...IFBiBob is going to be lynched anyway. But we didn't know for a fact that BiBob would be lynched, so your point quoted is based off the one if scenario (which did eventually come true).
The other two scenarios, (no lynch or lynch someone else) it absolutely benefits scum to get a claim out of him, unless a scum is the one flashwagoned at the end of D1 (which makes me think even further that Shadoxx is town, as he was the likely flashwagon with Bella and KayP on board, and they being the ones asking for the claim).
Anyway...like I said, the claim deal is just a supporting part of my Bella read (accommodating, follows town, didn't push her scum reads past her initial vote on them, her initial reasons were weird anyway, etc.).
GC, what do you make of the fact that Bella and KayP both pushed on each other D1, then both ended up on the Shadoxx wagon late D1, then both came on at the end of D1 to ask for a claim and hammer? Coincidence?-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
Thanks...good points. I was asking more about the whole storyline, than addressing my three points individually, and obviously the association is just an association and is fairly useless until we get a flip. But I thought it was at least noteworthy to point out the storyline between the two (or three if we include Shadoxx) should we get a flip from one of them.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
FWIW, sounds like Kitty has gone completely MIA
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p6976119-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 484, Tammy wrote:Frogger - you used meta with lala at the start of the game, but that's the only time I remember you using it. You recently played a game with Bella. Did that game factor into your read on bella in this game?
No. My read on Bella has been based on her play this game.
In Ori (the only other game I played with Bella), she replaced in halfway through D1 and I kind of ignored her because my hydra partner (Mollie) was having a massive 1v1 with Metal Sonic. D2, Tere replaced in and said she could find a tell on Bella to sort her, so I left Bella to Tere, although Bella did town up her slot late D2. D3 we had the game won by PoE.-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
@Tammy
If the voting drunk comment happened D1, I probably didn't notice or remember it. Mollie did most of the hydra work D1. I chimed in here and there, but mostly on Metal and Yukari stuff. I find it odd you're defending your predecessor with a single cherry picked post about drunk voting from a game she replaced into with me as part of a hydra. What about for those that don't have any meta with Bella and who are scumreading her?
Anyway, you mention you wanted to push Glork, then backed off on it. What caused you to back off? Who are your scumreads, and why?-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 531, KayP wrote:In post 528, Tammy wrote:That's fine.
I'm a vanilla townie by the way.
Just make sure to actually read what I said about Glork tomorrow.
Why are you claiming?
I'd assume because that was an unannounced L-1 vote by you.
God...this whole Bella (now Tammy)/KayP thing now is seriously setting off alarm bells.-
-
Fro99er
-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
-
-
-