In post 170, Boonskiies wrote:Can we lynch Mario? Wackpecker has town'd it up a little.
Unvote
In post 171, Bulbazoor wrote:VOTE: mario
I think you should stop blabbering abour rvs. Mario seems a bit iffy. He defends people for basically pointless reasons.
In post 172, Boonskiies wrote:Mario is playing exactly the same as my scum game with him last game. He doesn't respond to like anything. Comes in, posts one thing, completely changes direction of game and expects people to just believe him.
VOTE: Mario
these two votes were awful fast boon seemed pretty eager there. But then again I can kinda see where he is coming from. My predecessor did not play well at all
In post 323, Boonskiies wrote:@Pisskop - I guess for you, you are just hardcore defending the slot. Grayfoxxxx was more advocatey.
Nope.
I'm defending a read based on meta and personality. I don't like how easy the wagon was to form on a player who still hangs out in the newbie forums. I'll defend a townread on a newtown.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
He's NewbScum. This is exactly how he played in Pokemon Mafia...
@Dom - He abandoned me as scum last game; I was pretty much looking for a reason to tunnel him. I do believe the slot is scum, though. =/ I do like your last post, though, and in hindsight, your whole catching up is looking fine when you group it together.
In post 170, Boonskiies wrote:Can we lynch Mario? Wackpecker has town'd it up a little.
Unvote
In post 171, Bulbazoor wrote:VOTE: mario
I think you should stop blabbering abour rvs. Mario seems a bit iffy. He defends people for basically pointless reasons.
In post 172, Boonskiies wrote:Mario is playing exactly the same as my scum game with him last game. He doesn't respond to like anything. Comes in, posts one thing, completely changes direction of game and expects people to just believe him.
VOTE: Mario
these two votes were awful fast boon seemed pretty eager there. But then again I can kinda see where he is coming from. My predecessor did not play well at all
In post 213, Bulbazoor wrote:It is basically a vote on a slot that I find the scummiest. Why dont you like my vote? I find hes trying to act logical like last game in the marathon. As town, I usually see him acting more funnier and sarcastic. In games I read where he was town.
you don't have to remind us that you are town. That is normally something anti town players do
In post 221, Boonskiies wrote:No, i'm meta'ing him off of the lack of him posting much.
In post 213, Bulbazoor wrote:It is basically a vote on a slot that I find the scummiest. Why dont you like my vote? I find hes trying to act logical like last game in the marathon. As town, I usually see him acting more funnier and sarcastic. In games I read where he was town.
you don't have to remind us that you are town. That is normally something anti town players do
In post 221, Boonskiies wrote:No, i'm meta'ing him off of the lack of him posting much.
In post 257, pisskop wrote:And unvote is the removal of pressure, andm I've been lynched because I kept my vote on a player past its prime in D1 before.
Okay. So you acknowledge that the act had a specific purpose of avoiding unwanted attention (i.e. a lynch). Why call it stupid to notice that?
In post 258, pisskop wrote:If it wasnt clear I havent been paying enough attention to the game. This game's boring and slow-going.
And nothing makes the pace pick up like an unvote?
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
LOL as if Ive had all this content before I expressed my reads.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 171, Bulbazoor wrote:VOTE: mario
I think you should stop blabbering abour rvs. Mario seems a bit iffy. He defends people for basically pointless reasons.
Well, should he answer the questions? Or just ignore them? Catch 22. I really didn't like this vote out of them all.
In post 321, TheDominator37 wrote:Oh and I forgot in post 133 shaman seems awful eager to vote Mario or foxx
Yes, I was. What is your point? I was already voting one of them, and later switched to the other. They're the two players whose posts I like the least so far in this game.
TheDominator37 wrote:Ok I'm pretty much caught up. You guys want to interrogate me? Want me to RC?
I don't care if you roleclaim. I doubt very much whether it would change anything.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
In post 321, TheDominator37 wrote:Oh and I forgot in post 133 shaman seems awful eager to vote Mario or foxx
Yes, I was. What is your point? I was already voting one of them, and later switched to the other. They're the two players whose posts I like the least so far in this game.
TheDominator37 wrote:Ok I'm pretty much caught up. You guys want to interrogate me? Want me to RC?
I don't care if you roleclaim. I doubt very much whether it would change anything.
Scum are often eager to vote up someone and it was pretty early in the game and you wanted to vote up me and foxx. It looked scummy IMO
Seriously folks, the best he could do was "I don't like a vote this guy made about halfway through the game so he's scummy." And it just happens to be the guy that wants him dead and has given the most explanation for that position.
In post 346, TheDominator37 wrote:
Scum are often eager to vote up someone and it was pretty early in the game and you wanted to vote up me and foxx. It looked scummy IMO
I have literally no idea what this is supposed to mean. Having people I wanted to vote looks scummy?
