those things are good, though~
VOTE: Scorpious
In post 31, elusive wrote:1. Sweet or salty?
2. Favorite word of all time?
3. Who have you played with before and describe them in one word.
4. Link to the most recent complete town or scum game
lmaoIn post 58, Scorpious wrote:How do you feel about the Miller claim. My gut tells me its bullshit..
Don't like the dismissal here at all, I was probably a little too brief with my vote but a post like #30 on page 2 of a game reads entirely like someone trying too hard, too early. For reference, to that point, this was Atums only post, and there's no way anyone could or should read anything alignment-telling from something like that. Malakittens similarly hadn't said many relevant tings to that point. It's just assigning townreads to seem active. Second line on elusive is a weak, cautious statement which directs suspicion at them without really saying anything of value. ditto regarding me, reads more like someone keeping options open for lynches than doing any legitimate analysis, and then the vote is throwaway rvs nonsense. The whole thing never reads like a town thought process at any point.In post 60, Grib wrote:They're meta reads, which are lazy, but the votes on me are just as lazy so I think that puts us at an impasse.
Maybe I'll do something once I've slept for a bit.
In post 62, Malakittens wrote:Right now the miller claim should be left as is. Idk im not saying it's scummy or town because it's just a claim, but if he's town gives him more points so I kinda like it.
I should be around more tommorow. I haven't felt well all day today x.c
In post 66, Malakittens wrote:Catboi grib has a bunch of exp with me tbh so the early read on me doesnt bother me that much
In post 84, elusive wrote:I'm just wondering why catboi would claim. For example if I had a negative utility role (if Miller here means gets a guilty from the Cop) then I would 1. not out my role and instead fake crumb cop to protect the real cop and 2. dance on the rooftops to goad scum into trying to NK me again to protect power roles.
So now I'm figuring out why the self-preservationy play if this is town or if this is scum then? I mean obviously if catboi doesn't flip soon then what? I'm not sure. It's like a player claiming Vanilla, its pointless and annoying since it narrows the pool for scum NKs. Don't do it.
In post 103, superbowl9 wrote:When u come back and there's 5 pages 0.0
You mention that now, on page 5? While you're on the same wagon as me? And my claim is fishy but...not the best option for scum? What the hell are you even saying?In post 115, Banakai wrote:I kind of wanna vote catboi because his miller claim looks fishy, and yet I don't nessacarily think claiming miller would be the best option for a scum, for example if there was a cop not in the game your basically gonna lose if you go to lylo, and if there is another miller then they can counterclaim (multiple millers aren't very common)
I guess I'm gonna keep my vote on grib. Nothing else really catches my eye. Also if this game doesn't take off like team rocket real quick, then we are gonna end up with a random lynch.
While I agree that superbowl's post is pathetic it's not worth voting him for at this point, although antitown it doesn't necessarily hve any scum motivation. He needs to either step up or be replaced.In post 116, elusive wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
Umm..we have like 8 day deadlines and you think what 5 pages is a lot? It's nothing. Now, 40 pages at this point might be a lot. 20 would be decent.
In post 42, Scorpious wrote:Maxous,how do you feel about Catboi's miller claim?
In post 58, Scorpious wrote:In post 54, Banakai wrote:Also I don't really have any tells right now
we probbably have a cop if we have a miller but that isn't proven yet
How do you feel about the Miller claim. My gut tells me its bullshit..
In post 139, Scorpious wrote:@Grib, your content has come from meta and looking at the wiki. Do you have anything to say about the current game without referencing an outside source?
what is your townread on elusive based on?
I do agree,the millet claim feels scummy.
In post 182, Scorpious wrote:Ok,catboi so I make a mistake and remedy it.. You still have problems, yes I find your claim bullshit..
I think you are scum, I think claiming miller makes it super convinient for you to install a defense. If you get investigated you can just be like "see, I claimed miller". If they even investigate you.. Frankly I dont understand why all scum doesn't do that.
Scenario A- the potential cop buys your claim. Leaves you alone and you skate.
Scenario B- they investigate you,you come up guilty,but have your fake claim installed as a defense,its lazy..
Now you just use shitty piss poor excuses to vote me..
so now its a legit vote.VOTE: catboi
In post 189, Scorpious wrote:@catboi, in 123 you call super bowl "unacceptable". Then in 171 you say you like what he's posting,then turn to me. What in those 40 posts was said to move you from calling him "totally unacceptable" to liking him?
In post 191, elusive wrote:I found Scorpy to be a little iffy and I'm tired of noob AtE. However, Bella and others voting him what distinguishes Scorpy's ISO from Gray's? Regardless of how sarcasm is wasted on Gray.
In post 195, Scorpious wrote:so now,its because I was suspicious of you? And because i made a posting error? What connects me to fox?
In post 215, superbowl9 wrote:@more experienced people: can I get an analysis of the claim?
In post 225, Malakittens wrote:To be honest the claim doesn't make that much sense to me.
The weak modifier is a pretty weak variant of a cop. If there's a miller I'm actually expecting there to be a cop in the setup.
I don't really play mini normals, but wonder what would happen if a weak modifier targets a miller, if that would cause them to die.
In post 253, Malakittens wrote:In post 238, Malakittens wrote:Yeah well I have way more experience than you SB9, not to be insulting or anything there.
I am really reluctant to lynch the 'weak doc' on d1. Because that is (kinda) super strong, but if it's true that's our protective AND our investigate role it one shot. The miller and the WD CC's each other sadly. So if one flips we can reevaluate the other.
If IF IF Susp does flip scum then I'm thinking mafia likely has daytalk & we have an experienced player coaching him because it pretty much looks like he called catboi out from the start. I mean Susp could be an evil mastermind scum player too, but I like to think all of the above.
In post 289, Malakittens wrote:Oh catboi you innocent soul you. If we have a weak modifier the chances of having a cop is less and the likelyhood of a miller even lesser.
In post 296, Malakittens wrote:well tbh i don't exactly like the fact we are risking lynching a pr that's a variant of a doc and a cop in one shot.
i mean feel free to strongarm my lynch D2 if he flips scum, but i'm sure as hell not going to support that lynch
In post 297, shaddowez wrote:Mala, I know you don't have much reason to trust me, but sheep me on this...I'll explain tomorrow if I'm alive.
In post 97, Malakittens wrote:I have to look at something with Maxous and I'll get back to you on that.
In post 314, elusive wrote:Grib replaced site wide so anyone trying to pin scum on that is atrocious.
catboi's reads are nonsense and utterly so. "Feel strongly on elu-scum but absolutely think Scorpious should be the vote today."
So, again not voting your strongest scum read? Why?
In post 317, elusive wrote:
SO based on copious research (done to what aim? To establish fake claims? Tot justify miller claim? To?), it seems Scorpy's role is possible but still wants to vote Scorpy? Why?
In post 318, elusive wrote:
I'm not going to list people as town just to balance my reads. That's a dumb play as town to distort your feelings in order to fit players into a preconceived box of what a list of reads "should" look like. I went by how I felt, and right now I feel wary of a large portion of the game and to be honest I'd be suspicious of anyone who says they aren'tIn post 322, Bellaphant wrote:I'm feeling really mixed on catboi: on the one hand, I understand some of his reads, but he is scum-reading most of the game. I'm also wondering about the busy work of finding the games - it'd be a reasonable scum!tell for me, but I might have to do a bit of a meta read :S
p-edit, elu, not all of his reads are bad, and you've been a bit harsh about the super one, but you have some fair comments. Some of your comments can also be fair without meaning he is scum Mainly, though, I agree with the amount of FOS without a vote.
pp-edit, need to look at deadline/vc. Don't think I'm getting what I want today.
ordinarily I'd agree with this, really, but he was just asking people to explain their opinions and the method of doing so was so...blunt, didn't look like an attempt to gain towncred to me. Who expects to get townread by asking "why?" over and over?In post 351, shaddowez wrote:I have to disagree with this. Just asking "Why?", especially in the block text mode he did it, seems like he's attempting to engage people without actually putting any effort into what he's doing. Also, has he actually followed up with any of those people? I don't recall that being the case.
Have issues with some of your other reads, but elusive's post in 318 covers a lot of them. None of them make me scum read you just yet, but there are enough gotchas in there to keep an eye open.
In post 351, shaddowez wrote:I know what I'm attempting to say - I can't say that I know what you're reading from it though. It's likely it's the same thing, yes. I know that if people sheep me on a Scorp lynch and he's town, and I make it through the night, I'm getting speed lynched tomorrow.
In post 350, Atum wrote:In post 349, catboi wrote:And again, read the whole of the last page and tell me you don't see why I changed my mind.
I don't, can you tell me why?
In post 367, Atum wrote:Well you could have just said it'd be anti-town to say, which it was. Where I'm from, we call it [REDACTED]. But whatever. Moving on. Quote me the soft?
In post 281, shaddowez wrote:The claim also looks incredibly easy to hide behind. It's a limited shot, so any night he doesn't die he can claim either that he got town, or that he just hasn't used it yet. Claiming he hasn't used both of his shots will also sway the town against voting for him. Also, more reasons to be discussed at a later point in time.
In post 297, shaddowez wrote:Mala, I know you don't have much reason to trust me, but sheep me on this...I'll explain tomorrow if I'm alive.
In post 301, shaddowez wrote:In post 300, catboi wrote:In post 297, shaddowez wrote:Mala, I know you don't have much reason to trust me, but sheep me on this...I'll explain tomorrow if I'm alive.
are you 100% sure scorpious is scum?
Am I 100% sure? No. I'm not a daycop, so have no way to be 100% sure. I do have averrrrrrrrrystrong suspicion, however.
In post 351, shaddowez wrote:I know what I'm attempting to say - I can't say that I know what you're reading from it though. It's likely it's the same thing, yes. I know that if people sheep me on a Scorp lynch and he's town, and I make it through the night, I'm getting speed lynched tomorrow.
No
Having a hard time seeing this as genuine whatsoever, if you've actually got a defense to offer then post it rather than being dismissive of everyone.In post 407, elusive wrote:I'm town. I think you're purposefully ignoring my content. I also find it convenient that no fucktard has thought it might be important to look at Scorpius's interaction. Nor has any actually town doofus seen my scum games on this site and realized that if Scorpy was my scum partner I would bus the daylights out of him.
So yeah. Bored by playstyles of the less than worthy. Among other unsavory things I could say but won't because apparently.
In post 409, elusive wrote:lalendra, selectively quoting my iso is remarkable
In post 432, elusive wrote:I've asked both you and your buddy Superbowl several things and you've ignored that. So, its you who is ignoring the obvious.
You're right on this, I admit. Wasn't my intention to ignore it, it's just honestly so forgettable an interaction it barely registered. You argue with him over it, sure, but it's soft. You call him out (303) but you don't actually push on it and just say his reasoning's atrocious (314). Scorp in response to you says not very much in 313 and 315. Then ultimately again your "read" of him in 334 is wishy-washy nonsense. If that's supposed to prove that you're not partners, I'm not buying it. At all.In post 436, elusive wrote:And #425 is a lie, catboi you left out my interactions with Scorpy over him FOSIng Grib along with the ones I posted above. Shoddy.
And reading this, I'm struck by another big problem. You're attacking people for not doing research, but you've done nothing whatsoever yourself. Why not do that yourself if you actually have anything? Bu instead you're just insulting people and claiming they have nothing on you. It makes absolutely no sense for a town player to call people out to do something they're not even attempting themselves.In post 435, elusive wrote:Trying to blame me for your lack of research, logical skills and ability to go through Scorpius's interactions and look at them carefully or even do wagon analysis is not my problem.
Well, Grib's slot is dead so this is useless. Actually, what does any of this mean? Is the assumption that these people are likely partners because scorp fosed them, or town? This is straight up information over analysis.Here is Scorpius in ISO:
viewtopic.php?p=7136416&user_select[]=26244#p7136416
Posts that might make sense for people who give a fuck to look at:
#154, #203, #313, #314
FOSes: Grib (obvious town), catboi for the miller claim (idk what catboi is but i don't like it outside of alignment), Lalendra (RVs), Bella 2x,
Asks Grib why he has a townread on me, that's soft fosing as well,
See I understood that was a likely explanation, but just straight up asking someone to paraphrase is essentially useless as no one's likely to be tripped up that way. Looks more like a fabricated interaction than anything, if you were really testing for inconsisties I'd expect a little more thorough questioning.The question about why I ask people claiming to claim again? Umm...obviously because sometimes scum will slip and claim something and then slip and change it up. For example, look at the finished game Diamond is Unbreakable and how Sala fucks up his fake claim.
So yeah reaching and stupidity.
If I were scum, why would I hard defend Grib? Why would I go against a scum buddy and defend Grib? Seriously. No.
In post 439, elusive wrote:You're wrong.
How's that for defense?
Also, the burden of proof lies on you and the people on my wagon. Look at the shit wagon, its full of players who are using others for their reads. Where are the cases? There aren't any. Rank.
Also I despise people who ask for defense but then change the goal post. I explained some things you said I'm lying. Now when I flip town and then post game I'm going to feel justified writing, "This player's playstyle is worthless. See this game as evidence." Got it?
Mala's push sucks and seriously sucks.
Also, what research have you done? Have you looked at my scum or town meta and determined for example that as town I am always prickly as a pear about shitty stuff against me? Have you?
Or that my scum game is a lot better than my town game in general?
No, you haven't done research and are pointless. Lynch me so I can get away from this mentality of every single person on my wagon who I {} can't say it but you can imagine it, I'm sure.
In post 447, Malakittens wrote:plus theres two people ont he wagon i dont like
In post 487, Atum wrote:Prodge
Also, finally read through catboi's case for scum!elusive, and pretty much disagree with most/all of his conclusions. Reads more like someone looking for things to call scummy moreso than looking for someone who is scum.
Mala's still scum and all, but I guess I can wait on that, since I'm way too lazy to build an actual case there. Radj and super, I'll maybe try and post actual reasoning later today? But probably not.
Maxous, do you think voting a mislynch D1 is a scumtell?
In post 501, Firebringer wrote:Hermits entrance into this makes me a little worried about him.
VOTE: Hermit
The no hammer, just doesn't seem like him.
In post 514, superbowl9 wrote:In post 490, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:I rolled scum this game, so I am hoping that can be some positive utility to town.
Unfortunately I do not know who my scumbuddy is, so we are going to have to do actual scum hunting.
St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Firebringer has the right idea. When I am not blatantly anti-town, I am scum.
I really hate this
Maybe a gr8 b8 by jester, but I don't put it past him to actually be scum.
He's in elu's slot right? I'm thinking maybe jester then, because of how elu was asking to be lynched as well, or maybe it's a gambit, idk I have no experience with this
In post 510, Malakittens wrote:In post 506, Bellaphant wrote:@mala, you aren't voting and I'm finding it hard to get a full read on you. Any comments/questions my way?
I wanna vote max, but i don't know really how to explain my gut. :\
VOTE: max
elus reaction felt town hence why i unvoted ;-;
In post 515, Firebringer wrote:Hermit plays it hardcore anti town feel to him, his not wanting to lynch without an explanation just rubs me the wrong way.
I mean could he have at least said "X is not scum" or in my case elu.
Could you explain your reads in 500?In post 523, Firebringer wrote:
Funny thing is, I read this vote and was like "who is this on?" then looked at player list to see whose name matched and was like ohhh....I am stupid.
Is there anyone you guys want me to take a look at more in depth?
catboi said not very happy with me and hermits entrance but kind of doesn't help give me any direction to go with. What the hell do you expect? A page or two of posts giving you detailed analysis of everything that has gone on?
Not my style.
In post 549, Malakittens wrote:Also a mafia traitor is allowed in notmal, but I really don't think scum would scum claim like that
In post 565, Bellaphant wrote:@catboi, please explain that mala town-read, bc here's a stance for you: I disagree